Loading…

Psychosocial Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Screening Participation: A Conceptual Framework

Cancer screening participation shows a strong, graded association with socioeconomic status (SES) not only in countries such as the United States, where insurance status can be a barrier for lower income groups, but also in the United Kingdom, where the National Health Service provides all health ca...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Epidemiologic reviews 2011-07, Vol.33 (1), p.135-147
Main Authors: von Wagner, C., Good, A., Whitaker, K. L., Wardle, J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4516c8ffa36dfbe66e1732cc14571fd15148f380a7467127dd7dd93bf74408083
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4516c8ffa36dfbe66e1732cc14571fd15148f380a7467127dd7dd93bf74408083
container_end_page 147
container_issue 1
container_start_page 135
container_title Epidemiologic reviews
container_volume 33
creator von Wagner, C.
Good, A.
Whitaker, K. L.
Wardle, J.
description Cancer screening participation shows a strong, graded association with socioeconomic status (SES) not only in countries such as the United States, where insurance status can be a barrier for lower income groups, but also in the United Kingdom, where the National Health Service provides all health care to residents, including screening, for free. Traditionally, the literature on socioeconomic inequalities has focused on upstream factors, but more proximal (downstream) influences on screening participation also need to be examined, particularly those that address the graded nature of the association rather than focusing specifically on underserved groups. This review offers a framework that links some of the components and corollaries of SES (life stress, educational opportunities, illness experience) to known psychosocial determinants of screening uptake (beliefs about the value of early detection, fatalistic beliefs about cancer, self-efficacy). The aim is to explain why individuals from lower SES backgrounds perceive cancer screening tests as more threatening, more difficult to accomplish, and less beneficial. A better understanding of the mechanisms through which lower SES causes negative attitudes toward screening could facilitate the development of intervention strategies to reduce screening inequalities.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/epirev/mxq018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876190778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/epirev/mxq018</oup_id><sourcerecordid>876190778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4516c8ffa36dfbe66e1732cc14571fd15148f380a7467127dd7dd93bf74408083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFP2zAUgK2JCTrguCvyjV2y-sWp7XCrOtiQKoFUJu0Wuc7zZkjs1E4Y_HtSpew66UlPevred_gI-QzsK7CSz7FzEZ_n7cuOgfpAZlBIlQmZl0dkxqDkWcnFrxPyKaVHxpjIAY7JSQ4LJYTkM7K7T6_mT0jBON3Qb9hjbJ3Xvk80WLoZzwFN8KF1ht563A26cb3DRJ2nK-0NRroxEdE7_5ve69g74zrdu-Cv6JKuwkh0_fhEb6Ju8W-IT2fko9VNwvPDPiU_b64fVj-y9d3329VynZmCsz4rFiCMslZzUdstCoEgeW4MFAsJtoYFFMpyxbQshIRc1vU4Jd9aWRRMMcVPyeXk7WLYDZj6qnXJYNNoj2FIlZICSiblnswm0sSQUkRbddG1Or5WwKp95GqKXE2RR_7iYB62Ldb_6PeqI_BlAsLQ_cf1Bv7RihM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>876190778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychosocial Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Screening Participation: A Conceptual Framework</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>von Wagner, C. ; Good, A. ; Whitaker, K. L. ; Wardle, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>von Wagner, C. ; Good, A. ; Whitaker, K. L. ; Wardle, J.</creatorcontrib><description>Cancer screening participation shows a strong, graded association with socioeconomic status (SES) not only in countries such as the United States, where insurance status can be a barrier for lower income groups, but also in the United Kingdom, where the National Health Service provides all health care to residents, including screening, for free. Traditionally, the literature on socioeconomic inequalities has focused on upstream factors, but more proximal (downstream) influences on screening participation also need to be examined, particularly those that address the graded nature of the association rather than focusing specifically on underserved groups. This review offers a framework that links some of the components and corollaries of SES (life stress, educational opportunities, illness experience) to known psychosocial determinants of screening uptake (beliefs about the value of early detection, fatalistic beliefs about cancer, self-efficacy). The aim is to explain why individuals from lower SES backgrounds perceive cancer screening tests as more threatening, more difficult to accomplish, and less beneficial. A better understanding of the mechanisms through which lower SES causes negative attitudes toward screening could facilitate the development of intervention strategies to reduce screening inequalities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0193-936X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-6729</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/epirev/mxq018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21586673</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Attitude to Health ; Educational Status ; Health Services Research ; Healthcare Disparities - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Mass Screening - economics ; Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Models, Theoretical ; Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control ; Psychology ; Socioeconomic Factors</subject><ispartof>Epidemiologic reviews, 2011-07, Vol.33 (1), p.135-147</ispartof><rights>Epidemiologic Reviews © The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4516c8ffa36dfbe66e1732cc14571fd15148f380a7467127dd7dd93bf74408083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4516c8ffa36dfbe66e1732cc14571fd15148f380a7467127dd7dd93bf74408083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21586673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>von Wagner, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, J.</creatorcontrib><title>Psychosocial Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Screening Participation: A Conceptual Framework</title><title>Epidemiologic reviews</title><addtitle>Epidemiol Rev</addtitle><description>Cancer screening participation shows a strong, graded association with socioeconomic status (SES) not only in countries such as the United States, where insurance status can be a barrier for lower income groups, but also in the United Kingdom, where the National Health Service provides all health care to residents, including screening, for free. Traditionally, the literature on socioeconomic inequalities has focused on upstream factors, but more proximal (downstream) influences on screening participation also need to be examined, particularly those that address the graded nature of the association rather than focusing specifically on underserved groups. This review offers a framework that links some of the components and corollaries of SES (life stress, educational opportunities, illness experience) to known psychosocial determinants of screening uptake (beliefs about the value of early detection, fatalistic beliefs about cancer, self-efficacy). The aim is to explain why individuals from lower SES backgrounds perceive cancer screening tests as more threatening, more difficult to accomplish, and less beneficial. A better understanding of the mechanisms through which lower SES causes negative attitudes toward screening could facilitate the development of intervention strategies to reduce screening inequalities.</description><subject>Attitude to Health</subject><subject>Educational Status</subject><subject>Health Services Research</subject><subject>Healthcare Disparities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mass Screening - economics</subject><subject>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><issn>0193-936X</issn><issn>1478-6729</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFP2zAUgK2JCTrguCvyjV2y-sWp7XCrOtiQKoFUJu0Wuc7zZkjs1E4Y_HtSpew66UlPevred_gI-QzsK7CSz7FzEZ_n7cuOgfpAZlBIlQmZl0dkxqDkWcnFrxPyKaVHxpjIAY7JSQ4LJYTkM7K7T6_mT0jBON3Qb9hjbJ3Xvk80WLoZzwFN8KF1ht563A26cb3DRJ2nK-0NRroxEdE7_5ve69g74zrdu-Cv6JKuwkh0_fhEb6Ju8W-IT2fko9VNwvPDPiU_b64fVj-y9d3329VynZmCsz4rFiCMslZzUdstCoEgeW4MFAsJtoYFFMpyxbQshIRc1vU4Jd9aWRRMMcVPyeXk7WLYDZj6qnXJYNNoj2FIlZICSiblnswm0sSQUkRbddG1Or5WwKp95GqKXE2RR_7iYB62Ldb_6PeqI_BlAsLQ_cf1Bv7RihM</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>von Wagner, C.</creator><creator>Good, A.</creator><creator>Whitaker, K. L.</creator><creator>Wardle, J.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>Psychosocial Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Screening Participation: A Conceptual Framework</title><author>von Wagner, C. ; Good, A. ; Whitaker, K. L. ; Wardle, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4516c8ffa36dfbe66e1732cc14571fd15148f380a7467127dd7dd93bf74408083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Attitude to Health</topic><topic>Educational Status</topic><topic>Health Services Research</topic><topic>Healthcare Disparities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mass Screening - economics</topic><topic>Mass Screening - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Neoplasms - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>von Wagner, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Good, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, K. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wardle, J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epidemiologic reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>von Wagner, C.</au><au>Good, A.</au><au>Whitaker, K. L.</au><au>Wardle, J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychosocial Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Screening Participation: A Conceptual Framework</atitle><jtitle>Epidemiologic reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Epidemiol Rev</addtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>135</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>135-147</pages><issn>0193-936X</issn><eissn>1478-6729</eissn><abstract>Cancer screening participation shows a strong, graded association with socioeconomic status (SES) not only in countries such as the United States, where insurance status can be a barrier for lower income groups, but also in the United Kingdom, where the National Health Service provides all health care to residents, including screening, for free. Traditionally, the literature on socioeconomic inequalities has focused on upstream factors, but more proximal (downstream) influences on screening participation also need to be examined, particularly those that address the graded nature of the association rather than focusing specifically on underserved groups. This review offers a framework that links some of the components and corollaries of SES (life stress, educational opportunities, illness experience) to known psychosocial determinants of screening uptake (beliefs about the value of early detection, fatalistic beliefs about cancer, self-efficacy). The aim is to explain why individuals from lower SES backgrounds perceive cancer screening tests as more threatening, more difficult to accomplish, and less beneficial. A better understanding of the mechanisms through which lower SES causes negative attitudes toward screening could facilitate the development of intervention strategies to reduce screening inequalities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>21586673</pmid><doi>10.1093/epirev/mxq018</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0193-936X
ispartof Epidemiologic reviews, 2011-07, Vol.33 (1), p.135-147
issn 0193-936X
1478-6729
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876190778
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Attitude to Health
Educational Status
Health Services Research
Healthcare Disparities - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Mass Screening - economics
Mass Screening - statistics & numerical data
Models, Theoretical
Neoplasms - diagnosis
Neoplasms - prevention & control
Psychology
Socioeconomic Factors
title Psychosocial Determinants of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Cancer Screening Participation: A Conceptual Framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T17%3A54%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychosocial%20Determinants%20of%20Socioeconomic%20Inequalities%20in%20Cancer%20Screening%20Participation:%20A%20Conceptual%20Framework&rft.jtitle=Epidemiologic%20reviews&rft.au=von%20Wagner,%20C.&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=135&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=135-147&rft.issn=0193-936X&rft.eissn=1478-6729&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/epirev/mxq018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E876190778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-4516c8ffa36dfbe66e1732cc14571fd15148f380a7467127dd7dd93bf74408083%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=876190778&rft_id=info:pmid/21586673&rft_oup_id=10.1093/epirev/mxq018&rfr_iscdi=true