Loading…
The use of meta-analytical tools in risk assessment for food safety
This communication deals with the use of meta-analysis as a valuable tool for the synthesis of food safety research, and in quantitative risk assessment modelling. A common methodology for the conduction of meta-analysis (i.e., systematic review and data extraction, parameterisation of effect size,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Food microbiology 2011-06, Vol.28 (4), p.823-827 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-6f644ed33497f49cc15a743261acced092e0408ef9b866f9791a4c78081d6fa23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-6f644ed33497f49cc15a743261acced092e0408ef9b866f9791a4c78081d6fa23 |
container_end_page | 827 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 823 |
container_title | Food microbiology |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Gonzales-Barron, Ursula Butler, Francis |
description | This communication deals with the use of meta-analysis as a valuable tool for the synthesis of food safety research, and in quantitative risk assessment modelling. A common methodology for the conduction of meta-analysis (i.e., systematic review and data extraction, parameterisation of effect size, estimation of overall effect size, assessment of heterogeneity, and presentation of results) is explained by reviewing two meta-analyses derived from separate sets of primary studies of
Salmonella in pork. Integrating different primary studies, the first meta-analysis elucidated for the first time a relationship between the proportion of
Salmonella-carrier slaughter pigs entering the slaughter lines and the resulting proportion of contaminated carcasses at the point of evisceration; finding that the individual studies on their own could not reveal. On the other hand, the second application showed that meta-analysis can be used to estimate the overall effect of a critical process stage (chilling) on the incidence of the pathogen under study. The derivation of a relationship between variables and a probabilistic distribution is illustrations of the valuable quantitative information synthesised by the meta-analytical tools, which can be incorporated in risk assessment modelling. Strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis within the context of food safety are also discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.fm.2010.04.007 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876224576</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S074000201000081X</els_id><sourcerecordid>863427876</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-6f644ed33497f49cc15a743261acced092e0408ef9b866f9791a4c78081d6fa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFrFDEUh4NU7LZ691RyKZ5mfclkkklvsqgVCl7qOaSZF8w6M2nzZgv735u6a3sSD4_Hg-_34_Ex9l7AWoDQH7frOK0l1BPUGsC8YisBtmustf0JW4FR0ABIOGVnRFsAIbrWvmGnUnRCCNWt2Ob2J_IdIc-RT7j4xs9-3C8p-JEvOY_E08xLol_cEyHRhPPCYy518sDJR1z2b9nr6EfCd8d9zn58-Xy7uW5uvn_9tvl00wRlzNLoqJXCoW2VNVHZEETnjWqlFj4EHMBKBAU9RnvXax2tscKrYHroxaCjl-05-3DovS_5YYe0uClRwHH0M-Ydud5oKVVn9P9J3Spp-j8kHMhQMlHB6O5LmnzZOwHuybHbuji5J8cOlKuOa-TiWL67m3B4DvyVWoHLI-CpeozFzyHRC6dEb0BD5a4OHFZpjwmLo5Bwri5SwbC4Iad_f_EboX-Wwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863427876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The use of meta-analytical tools in risk assessment for food safety</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Gonzales-Barron, Ursula ; Butler, Francis</creator><creatorcontrib>Gonzales-Barron, Ursula ; Butler, Francis</creatorcontrib><description>This communication deals with the use of meta-analysis as a valuable tool for the synthesis of food safety research, and in quantitative risk assessment modelling. A common methodology for the conduction of meta-analysis (i.e., systematic review and data extraction, parameterisation of effect size, estimation of overall effect size, assessment of heterogeneity, and presentation of results) is explained by reviewing two meta-analyses derived from separate sets of primary studies of
Salmonella in pork. Integrating different primary studies, the first meta-analysis elucidated for the first time a relationship between the proportion of
Salmonella-carrier slaughter pigs entering the slaughter lines and the resulting proportion of contaminated carcasses at the point of evisceration; finding that the individual studies on their own could not reveal. On the other hand, the second application showed that meta-analysis can be used to estimate the overall effect of a critical process stage (chilling) on the incidence of the pathogen under study. The derivation of a relationship between variables and a probabilistic distribution is illustrations of the valuable quantitative information synthesised by the meta-analytical tools, which can be incorporated in risk assessment modelling. Strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis within the context of food safety are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-0020</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2010.04.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21511145</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FOMIE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chilling ; Food industries ; Food microbiology ; Food Safety - methods ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Hygiene and safety ; Meat - microbiology ; Meta-analysis ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Pig ; Pork ; Risk assessment ; Risk Assessment - methods ; Salmonella ; Salmonella - growth & development ; Slaughter ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Food microbiology, 2011-06, Vol.28 (4), p.823-827</ispartof><rights>2010 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-6f644ed33497f49cc15a743261acced092e0408ef9b866f9791a4c78081d6fa23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-6f644ed33497f49cc15a743261acced092e0408ef9b866f9791a4c78081d6fa23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24187060$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21511145$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gonzales-Barron, Ursula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Francis</creatorcontrib><title>The use of meta-analytical tools in risk assessment for food safety</title><title>Food microbiology</title><addtitle>Food Microbiol</addtitle><description>This communication deals with the use of meta-analysis as a valuable tool for the synthesis of food safety research, and in quantitative risk assessment modelling. A common methodology for the conduction of meta-analysis (i.e., systematic review and data extraction, parameterisation of effect size, estimation of overall effect size, assessment of heterogeneity, and presentation of results) is explained by reviewing two meta-analyses derived from separate sets of primary studies of
Salmonella in pork. Integrating different primary studies, the first meta-analysis elucidated for the first time a relationship between the proportion of
Salmonella-carrier slaughter pigs entering the slaughter lines and the resulting proportion of contaminated carcasses at the point of evisceration; finding that the individual studies on their own could not reveal. On the other hand, the second application showed that meta-analysis can be used to estimate the overall effect of a critical process stage (chilling) on the incidence of the pathogen under study. The derivation of a relationship between variables and a probabilistic distribution is illustrations of the valuable quantitative information synthesised by the meta-analytical tools, which can be incorporated in risk assessment modelling. Strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis within the context of food safety are also discussed.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chilling</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Food microbiology</subject><subject>Food Safety - methods</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Hygiene and safety</subject><subject>Meat - microbiology</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis as Topic</subject><subject>Pig</subject><subject>Pork</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk Assessment - methods</subject><subject>Salmonella</subject><subject>Salmonella - growth & development</subject><subject>Slaughter</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0740-0020</issn><issn>1095-9998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMFrFDEUh4NU7LZ691RyKZ5mfclkkklvsqgVCl7qOaSZF8w6M2nzZgv735u6a3sSD4_Hg-_34_Ex9l7AWoDQH7frOK0l1BPUGsC8YisBtmustf0JW4FR0ABIOGVnRFsAIbrWvmGnUnRCCNWt2Ob2J_IdIc-RT7j4xs9-3C8p-JEvOY_E08xLol_cEyHRhPPCYy518sDJR1z2b9nr6EfCd8d9zn58-Xy7uW5uvn_9tvl00wRlzNLoqJXCoW2VNVHZEETnjWqlFj4EHMBKBAU9RnvXax2tscKrYHroxaCjl-05-3DovS_5YYe0uClRwHH0M-Ydud5oKVVn9P9J3Spp-j8kHMhQMlHB6O5LmnzZOwHuybHbuji5J8cOlKuOa-TiWL67m3B4DvyVWoHLI-CpeozFzyHRC6dEb0BD5a4OHFZpjwmLo5Bwri5SwbC4Iad_f_EboX-Wwg</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Gonzales-Barron, Ursula</creator><creator>Butler, Francis</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>The use of meta-analytical tools in risk assessment for food safety</title><author>Gonzales-Barron, Ursula ; Butler, Francis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-6f644ed33497f49cc15a743261acced092e0408ef9b866f9791a4c78081d6fa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chilling</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Food microbiology</topic><topic>Food Safety - methods</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Hygiene and safety</topic><topic>Meat - microbiology</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis as Topic</topic><topic>Pig</topic><topic>Pork</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk Assessment - methods</topic><topic>Salmonella</topic><topic>Salmonella - growth & development</topic><topic>Slaughter</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gonzales-Barron, Ursula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, Francis</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Food microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gonzales-Barron, Ursula</au><au>Butler, Francis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The use of meta-analytical tools in risk assessment for food safety</atitle><jtitle>Food microbiology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Microbiol</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>823</spage><epage>827</epage><pages>823-827</pages><issn>0740-0020</issn><eissn>1095-9998</eissn><coden>FOMIE5</coden><abstract>This communication deals with the use of meta-analysis as a valuable tool for the synthesis of food safety research, and in quantitative risk assessment modelling. A common methodology for the conduction of meta-analysis (i.e., systematic review and data extraction, parameterisation of effect size, estimation of overall effect size, assessment of heterogeneity, and presentation of results) is explained by reviewing two meta-analyses derived from separate sets of primary studies of
Salmonella in pork. Integrating different primary studies, the first meta-analysis elucidated for the first time a relationship between the proportion of
Salmonella-carrier slaughter pigs entering the slaughter lines and the resulting proportion of contaminated carcasses at the point of evisceration; finding that the individual studies on their own could not reveal. On the other hand, the second application showed that meta-analysis can be used to estimate the overall effect of a critical process stage (chilling) on the incidence of the pathogen under study. The derivation of a relationship between variables and a probabilistic distribution is illustrations of the valuable quantitative information synthesised by the meta-analytical tools, which can be incorporated in risk assessment modelling. Strengths and weaknesses of meta-analysis within the context of food safety are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21511145</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fm.2010.04.007</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-0020 |
ispartof | Food microbiology, 2011-06, Vol.28 (4), p.823-827 |
issn | 0740-0020 1095-9998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876224576 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Biological and medical sciences Chilling Food industries Food microbiology Food Safety - methods Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Hygiene and safety Meat - microbiology Meta-analysis Meta-Analysis as Topic Pig Pork Risk assessment Risk Assessment - methods Salmonella Salmonella - growth & development Slaughter Swine |
title | The use of meta-analytical tools in risk assessment for food safety |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T20%3A06%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20use%20of%20meta-analytical%20tools%20in%20risk%20assessment%20for%20food%20safety&rft.jtitle=Food%20microbiology&rft.au=Gonzales-Barron,%20Ursula&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=823&rft.epage=827&rft.pages=823-827&rft.issn=0740-0020&rft.eissn=1095-9998&rft.coden=FOMIE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fm.2010.04.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E863427876%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-6f644ed33497f49cc15a743261acced092e0408ef9b866f9791a4c78081d6fa23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863427876&rft_id=info:pmid/21511145&rfr_iscdi=true |