Loading…
Effects of Manipulations with Visual Feedback on Postural Responses in Humans Maintaining an Upright Stance
We studied postural reactions evoked by vibrational stimulation of the anterior tibial and posterior neck muscles under three different conditions of visual control (in a darkened room): (i) upon standing with the eyes open, EO, with perception of a stationary 2D image of the visual environment on t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neurophysiology (New York) 2011-07, Vol.43 (1), p.30-37 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | We studied postural reactions evoked by vibrational stimulation of the anterior tibial and posterior neck muscles under three different conditions of visual control (in a darkened room): (i) upon standing with the eyes open, EO, with perception of a stationary 2D image of the visual environment on the screen, (ii) under conditions of perception of a 3D virtual visual environment, VVE, and (iii) upon standing with the eyes closed, EC. Vibrational stimulation of both muscle groups evoked forward inclinations of the body; average values of the latter under control conditions (EC) were close to each other. The VVE mimicking a real visual environment possessed two planes, a mobile foreground one, whose shifts were programmed in such a manner that they correlated with oscillations of the body, and a stable background one. The tested subjects were asked to use the latter as a visual reference. Under VVE conditions, the amplitude of postural reactions depended on the feedback coefficient between the body movements and shifts of the VVE foreground and the direction of this feedback (its synphase or antiphase, sph or aph, mode). Postural responses at the feedback sph direction became greater with increase in the feedback coefficient (i.e., with increases in the magnitude of shifts of the VVE foreground) and reached values typical of standing under EC conditions. In the case of the aph type of feedback, the responses changed insignificantly. If the lowest feedback coefficient, 1.0, was used, the postural responses tended to decrease, as compared with those under EO conditions. The difference between the values observed at the sph and aph types of feedback with similar coefficients was manifested more intensely in the case of stimulation of the neck muscles. This fact shows that postural reactions triggered by afferent signals from the neck muscles depend more considerably on the ongoing visual afferentation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0090-2977 1573-9007 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11062-011-9182-8 |