Loading…
A study of wind and buoyancy driven flows through commercial wind towers
► CFD Models of commercial wind towers comparing buoyancy and wind driven tests ► CFD modeling validated using full scale experimental testing ► Heat source within buildings do not alone create buoyancy, must be combined with stratification ► Wind driving force provides 76% more indoor ventilation t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Energy and buildings 2011-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1784-1791 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-149723e9a0a3dc9ef5286858e2aaa1fc83e738ec0d9ea9aad4e663aaf9c3303a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-149723e9a0a3dc9ef5286858e2aaa1fc83e738ec0d9ea9aad4e663aaf9c3303a3 |
container_end_page | 1791 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1784 |
container_title | Energy and buildings |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Hughes, Ben Richard Cheuk-Ming, Mak |
description | ► CFD Models of commercial wind towers comparing buoyancy and wind driven tests ► CFD modeling validated using full scale experimental testing ► Heat source within buildings do not alone create buoyancy, must be combined with stratification ► Wind driving force provides 76% more indoor ventilation than buoyancy
Commercial wind towers have been the focus of intensive research in terms of their design and performance. There are two main forces which drive the flow through these devices, external wind and buoyancy due to temperature difference. This study examines the relationship between these two forces and the indoor ventilation rate achieved. The work uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to isolate and investigate the two forces and draw comparisons. The study found that as expected the external driving wind is the primary driving force providing 76% more internal ventilation than buoyancy driven flow, which is deemed secondary. Moreover the study found that the effect of buoyancy is insignificant without an external airflow passage other than the wind tower itself. The addition of an external airflow passage such as a window in combination with buoyancy force increased the indoor ventilation by 47%. Therefore the careful positioning of windows in conjunction with internal heat source has the potential to overcome the lack of external wind driven forces in dense urban environments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.022 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876232779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378778811001009</els_id><sourcerecordid>876232779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-149723e9a0a3dc9ef5286858e2aaa1fc83e738ec0d9ea9aad4e663aaf9c3303a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhbNQsFZ_gpCN6CZxHklmspJSfEHBja6H25kbOyXJ1JmkJf_elBSXurjczXfOgS-KbihJKaHFwzbFdt3b2qSMUJoSnhLGzqIZ4UImQkh5EV2GsCWEFLmgs-h1EYeuN0PsqvhgWxPDeOveDdDqITbe7rGNq9odQtxtvOu_NrF2TYNeW6inROcO6MNVdF5BHfD69OfR5_PTx_I1Wb2_vC0Xq0RnOe0SmpWCcSyBADe6xCpnspC5RAYAtNKSo-ASNTElQglgMiwKDlCVmnPCgc-ju6l35913j6FTjQ0a6xpadH1QUhSMMyHKkbz_k6RCCJoxSbIRzSdUexeCx0rtvG3AD4oSdfSqturkVR29KsLV6HXM3Z4mIGioKz9as-E3zDJWZpzTkXucOBzN7C16FbTFVqOxHnWnjLP_LP0AcZ6TJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1777142804</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A study of wind and buoyancy driven flows through commercial wind towers</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Hughes, Ben Richard ; Cheuk-Ming, Mak</creator><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Ben Richard ; Cheuk-Ming, Mak</creatorcontrib><description>► CFD Models of commercial wind towers comparing buoyancy and wind driven tests ► CFD modeling validated using full scale experimental testing ► Heat source within buildings do not alone create buoyancy, must be combined with stratification ► Wind driving force provides 76% more indoor ventilation than buoyancy
Commercial wind towers have been the focus of intensive research in terms of their design and performance. There are two main forces which drive the flow through these devices, external wind and buoyancy due to temperature difference. This study examines the relationship between these two forces and the indoor ventilation rate achieved. The work uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to isolate and investigate the two forces and draw comparisons. The study found that as expected the external driving wind is the primary driving force providing 76% more internal ventilation than buoyancy driven flow, which is deemed secondary. Moreover the study found that the effect of buoyancy is insignificant without an external airflow passage other than the wind tower itself. The addition of an external airflow passage such as a window in combination with buoyancy force increased the indoor ventilation by 47%. Therefore the careful positioning of windows in conjunction with internal heat source has the potential to overcome the lack of external wind driven forces in dense urban environments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-7788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.022</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENEBDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Airflow ; Applied sciences ; Building technical equipments ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Buoyancy ; CFD ; Computation methods. Tables. Charts ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Driving ; Environmental engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Heat sources ; Indoor ; Indoor ventilation ; Structural analysis. Stresses ; Urban environment ; Ventilation ; Ventilation. Air conditioning ; Wind tower ; Wind towers</subject><ispartof>Energy and buildings, 2011-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1784-1791</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-149723e9a0a3dc9ef5286858e2aaa1fc83e738ec0d9ea9aad4e663aaf9c3303a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-149723e9a0a3dc9ef5286858e2aaa1fc83e738ec0d9ea9aad4e663aaf9c3303a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24294331$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Ben Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheuk-Ming, Mak</creatorcontrib><title>A study of wind and buoyancy driven flows through commercial wind towers</title><title>Energy and buildings</title><description>► CFD Models of commercial wind towers comparing buoyancy and wind driven tests ► CFD modeling validated using full scale experimental testing ► Heat source within buildings do not alone create buoyancy, must be combined with stratification ► Wind driving force provides 76% more indoor ventilation than buoyancy
Commercial wind towers have been the focus of intensive research in terms of their design and performance. There are two main forces which drive the flow through these devices, external wind and buoyancy due to temperature difference. This study examines the relationship between these two forces and the indoor ventilation rate achieved. The work uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to isolate and investigate the two forces and draw comparisons. The study found that as expected the external driving wind is the primary driving force providing 76% more internal ventilation than buoyancy driven flow, which is deemed secondary. Moreover the study found that the effect of buoyancy is insignificant without an external airflow passage other than the wind tower itself. The addition of an external airflow passage such as a window in combination with buoyancy force increased the indoor ventilation by 47%. Therefore the careful positioning of windows in conjunction with internal heat source has the potential to overcome the lack of external wind driven forces in dense urban environments.</description><subject>Airflow</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Building technical equipments</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Buoyancy</subject><subject>CFD</subject><subject>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Driving</subject><subject>Environmental engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Heat sources</subject><subject>Indoor</subject><subject>Indoor ventilation</subject><subject>Structural analysis. Stresses</subject><subject>Urban environment</subject><subject>Ventilation</subject><subject>Ventilation. Air conditioning</subject><subject>Wind tower</subject><subject>Wind towers</subject><issn>0378-7788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLw0AUhbNQsFZ_gpCN6CZxHklmspJSfEHBja6H25kbOyXJ1JmkJf_elBSXurjczXfOgS-KbihJKaHFwzbFdt3b2qSMUJoSnhLGzqIZ4UImQkh5EV2GsCWEFLmgs-h1EYeuN0PsqvhgWxPDeOveDdDqITbe7rGNq9odQtxtvOu_NrF2TYNeW6inROcO6MNVdF5BHfD69OfR5_PTx_I1Wb2_vC0Xq0RnOe0SmpWCcSyBADe6xCpnspC5RAYAtNKSo-ASNTElQglgMiwKDlCVmnPCgc-ju6l35913j6FTjQ0a6xpadH1QUhSMMyHKkbz_k6RCCJoxSbIRzSdUexeCx0rtvG3AD4oSdfSqturkVR29KsLV6HXM3Z4mIGioKz9as-E3zDJWZpzTkXucOBzN7C16FbTFVqOxHnWnjLP_LP0AcZ6TJA</recordid><startdate>20110701</startdate><enddate>20110701</enddate><creator>Hughes, Ben Richard</creator><creator>Cheuk-Ming, Mak</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110701</creationdate><title>A study of wind and buoyancy driven flows through commercial wind towers</title><author>Hughes, Ben Richard ; Cheuk-Ming, Mak</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-149723e9a0a3dc9ef5286858e2aaa1fc83e738ec0d9ea9aad4e663aaf9c3303a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Airflow</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Building technical equipments</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Buoyancy</topic><topic>CFD</topic><topic>Computation methods. Tables. Charts</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Driving</topic><topic>Environmental engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Heat sources</topic><topic>Indoor</topic><topic>Indoor ventilation</topic><topic>Structural analysis. Stresses</topic><topic>Urban environment</topic><topic>Ventilation</topic><topic>Ventilation. Air conditioning</topic><topic>Wind tower</topic><topic>Wind towers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hughes, Ben Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheuk-Ming, Mak</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hughes, Ben Richard</au><au>Cheuk-Ming, Mak</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A study of wind and buoyancy driven flows through commercial wind towers</atitle><jtitle>Energy and buildings</jtitle><date>2011-07-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1784</spage><epage>1791</epage><pages>1784-1791</pages><issn>0378-7788</issn><coden>ENEBDR</coden><abstract>► CFD Models of commercial wind towers comparing buoyancy and wind driven tests ► CFD modeling validated using full scale experimental testing ► Heat source within buildings do not alone create buoyancy, must be combined with stratification ► Wind driving force provides 76% more indoor ventilation than buoyancy
Commercial wind towers have been the focus of intensive research in terms of their design and performance. There are two main forces which drive the flow through these devices, external wind and buoyancy due to temperature difference. This study examines the relationship between these two forces and the indoor ventilation rate achieved. The work uses computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling to isolate and investigate the two forces and draw comparisons. The study found that as expected the external driving wind is the primary driving force providing 76% more internal ventilation than buoyancy driven flow, which is deemed secondary. Moreover the study found that the effect of buoyancy is insignificant without an external airflow passage other than the wind tower itself. The addition of an external airflow passage such as a window in combination with buoyancy force increased the indoor ventilation by 47%. Therefore the careful positioning of windows in conjunction with internal heat source has the potential to overcome the lack of external wind driven forces in dense urban environments.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.022</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0378-7788 |
ispartof | Energy and buildings, 2011-07, Vol.43 (7), p.1784-1791 |
issn | 0378-7788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_876232779 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Airflow Applied sciences Building technical equipments Buildings Buildings. Public works Buoyancy CFD Computation methods. Tables. Charts Computational fluid dynamics Driving Environmental engineering Exact sciences and technology Heat sources Indoor Indoor ventilation Structural analysis. Stresses Urban environment Ventilation Ventilation. Air conditioning Wind tower Wind towers |
title | A study of wind and buoyancy driven flows through commercial wind towers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A58%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20study%20of%20wind%20and%20buoyancy%20driven%20flows%20through%20commercial%20wind%20towers&rft.jtitle=Energy%20and%20buildings&rft.au=Hughes,%20Ben%20Richard&rft.date=2011-07-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1784&rft.epage=1791&rft.pages=1784-1791&rft.issn=0378-7788&rft.coden=ENEBDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.03.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E876232779%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-149723e9a0a3dc9ef5286858e2aaa1fc83e738ec0d9ea9aad4e663aaf9c3303a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1777142804&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |