Loading…

Performance evaluation of underwater platforms in the context of space exploration

Robotic platforms are essential for future human planetary and lunar exploration as they can operate in more extreme environments with a greater endurance than human explorers. In this era of space exploration, a terrestrial analog that can be used for development of the coordination between manned...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Planetary and space science 2010-03, Vol.58 (4), p.706-716
Main Authors: Forrest, A.L., Laval, B.E., Lim, D.S.S., Williams, D.R., Trembanis, A.C., Marinova, M.M., Shepard, R., Brady, A.L., Slater, G.F., Gernhardt, M.L., McKay, C.P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5aa7b9688ee8b116f3a9734421c371acbe0f1386a8165c420c1d0df7865176f13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5aa7b9688ee8b116f3a9734421c371acbe0f1386a8165c420c1d0df7865176f13
container_end_page 716
container_issue 4
container_start_page 706
container_title Planetary and space science
container_volume 58
creator Forrest, A.L.
Laval, B.E.
Lim, D.S.S.
Williams, D.R.
Trembanis, A.C.
Marinova, M.M.
Shepard, R.
Brady, A.L.
Slater, G.F.
Gernhardt, M.L.
McKay, C.P.
description Robotic platforms are essential for future human planetary and lunar exploration as they can operate in more extreme environments with a greater endurance than human explorers. In this era of space exploration, a terrestrial analog that can be used for development of the coordination between manned and robotic vehicles will optimize the scientific return of future missions while concurrently minimizing the downtime of both human explorers and robotic platforms. This work presents the use of underwater exploratory robots – autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), remotely operated vehicles (ROV), and manned submersibles – as analogues for mixed human–robot exploration of space. Subaqueous settings present diverse challenges for navigation, operation and recovery that require the development of an exploration model of a similar complexity as required for space exploration. To capitalize on the strengths of both robotic and human explorers this work presents lessons learnt with respect to the fields of human–robotic interface (HRI) and operator training. These are then used in the development of mission evaluation tools: (1) a task efficiency index (TEI), (2) performance metrics, and (3) exploration metrics. Although these independent evaluations were useful for specific missions, further refinement will be required to fully evaluate the strengths and capabilities of multiple platforms in a human–robotic exploration campaign in order to take advantage of unforeseen science opportunities in remote settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.pss.2009.08.007
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877574426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0032063309002475</els_id><sourcerecordid>877574426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5aa7b9688ee8b116f3a9734421c371acbe0f1386a8165c420c1d0df7865176f13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwA9iyMSWc48Z2xIQqvqRKIASz5ToX4SqNg-2U8u9xKDPTDffeSfcIuaRQUKD8elMMIRQlQF2ALADEEZlRKVhegZTHZAbAyhw4Y6fkLIQNAHBeihl5fUHfOr_VvcEMd7obdbSuz1ybjX2D_ktH9NnQ6ThRIbN9Fj8wM66PuI8TFgY9qfuhc_7XPScnre4CXvzNOXm_v3tbPuar54en5e0qN6ysY15pLdY1lxJRrinlLdO1YItFSQ0TVJs1QkuZ5FpSXplFCYY20LRC8ooKnlZzcnW4O3j3OWKIamuDwa7TPboxKClEJdI9nkh6II13IXhs1eDtVvtvRUFN-dRGpXxqyqdAqpQvOTcHB9MLO4teBWMxVWqsRxNV4-w_9g88MHkT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>877574426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance evaluation of underwater platforms in the context of space exploration</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Forrest, A.L. ; Laval, B.E. ; Lim, D.S.S. ; Williams, D.R. ; Trembanis, A.C. ; Marinova, M.M. ; Shepard, R. ; Brady, A.L. ; Slater, G.F. ; Gernhardt, M.L. ; McKay, C.P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Forrest, A.L. ; Laval, B.E. ; Lim, D.S.S. ; Williams, D.R. ; Trembanis, A.C. ; Marinova, M.M. ; Shepard, R. ; Brady, A.L. ; Slater, G.F. ; Gernhardt, M.L. ; McKay, C.P.</creatorcontrib><description>Robotic platforms are essential for future human planetary and lunar exploration as they can operate in more extreme environments with a greater endurance than human explorers. In this era of space exploration, a terrestrial analog that can be used for development of the coordination between manned and robotic vehicles will optimize the scientific return of future missions while concurrently minimizing the downtime of both human explorers and robotic platforms. This work presents the use of underwater exploratory robots – autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), remotely operated vehicles (ROV), and manned submersibles – as analogues for mixed human–robot exploration of space. Subaqueous settings present diverse challenges for navigation, operation and recovery that require the development of an exploration model of a similar complexity as required for space exploration. To capitalize on the strengths of both robotic and human explorers this work presents lessons learnt with respect to the fields of human–robotic interface (HRI) and operator training. These are then used in the development of mission evaluation tools: (1) a task efficiency index (TEI), (2) performance metrics, and (3) exploration metrics. Although these independent evaluations were useful for specific missions, further refinement will be required to fully evaluate the strengths and capabilities of multiple platforms in a human–robotic exploration campaign in order to take advantage of unforeseen science opportunities in remote settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-0633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5088</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pss.2009.08.007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Autonomous underwater vehicle ; DeepWorker ; Exploration metrics ; Human–robotic interface ; Performance metrics ; Remotely operated vehicle</subject><ispartof>Planetary and space science, 2010-03, Vol.58 (4), p.706-716</ispartof><rights>2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5aa7b9688ee8b116f3a9734421c371acbe0f1386a8165c420c1d0df7865176f13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5aa7b9688ee8b116f3a9734421c371acbe0f1386a8165c420c1d0df7865176f13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forrest, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laval, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, D.S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trembanis, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinova, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, G.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernhardt, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, C.P.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance evaluation of underwater platforms in the context of space exploration</title><title>Planetary and space science</title><description>Robotic platforms are essential for future human planetary and lunar exploration as they can operate in more extreme environments with a greater endurance than human explorers. In this era of space exploration, a terrestrial analog that can be used for development of the coordination between manned and robotic vehicles will optimize the scientific return of future missions while concurrently minimizing the downtime of both human explorers and robotic platforms. This work presents the use of underwater exploratory robots – autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), remotely operated vehicles (ROV), and manned submersibles – as analogues for mixed human–robot exploration of space. Subaqueous settings present diverse challenges for navigation, operation and recovery that require the development of an exploration model of a similar complexity as required for space exploration. To capitalize on the strengths of both robotic and human explorers this work presents lessons learnt with respect to the fields of human–robotic interface (HRI) and operator training. These are then used in the development of mission evaluation tools: (1) a task efficiency index (TEI), (2) performance metrics, and (3) exploration metrics. Although these independent evaluations were useful for specific missions, further refinement will be required to fully evaluate the strengths and capabilities of multiple platforms in a human–robotic exploration campaign in order to take advantage of unforeseen science opportunities in remote settings.</description><subject>Autonomous underwater vehicle</subject><subject>DeepWorker</subject><subject>Exploration metrics</subject><subject>Human–robotic interface</subject><subject>Performance metrics</subject><subject>Remotely operated vehicle</subject><issn>0032-0633</issn><issn>1873-5088</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQQC0EEqXwA9iyMSWc48Z2xIQqvqRKIASz5ToX4SqNg-2U8u9xKDPTDffeSfcIuaRQUKD8elMMIRQlQF2ALADEEZlRKVhegZTHZAbAyhw4Y6fkLIQNAHBeihl5fUHfOr_VvcEMd7obdbSuz1ybjX2D_ktH9NnQ6ThRIbN9Fj8wM66PuI8TFgY9qfuhc_7XPScnre4CXvzNOXm_v3tbPuar54en5e0qN6ysY15pLdY1lxJRrinlLdO1YItFSQ0TVJs1QkuZ5FpSXplFCYY20LRC8ooKnlZzcnW4O3j3OWKIamuDwa7TPboxKClEJdI9nkh6II13IXhs1eDtVvtvRUFN-dRGpXxqyqdAqpQvOTcHB9MLO4teBWMxVWqsRxNV4-w_9g88MHkT</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Forrest, A.L.</creator><creator>Laval, B.E.</creator><creator>Lim, D.S.S.</creator><creator>Williams, D.R.</creator><creator>Trembanis, A.C.</creator><creator>Marinova, M.M.</creator><creator>Shepard, R.</creator><creator>Brady, A.L.</creator><creator>Slater, G.F.</creator><creator>Gernhardt, M.L.</creator><creator>McKay, C.P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Performance evaluation of underwater platforms in the context of space exploration</title><author>Forrest, A.L. ; Laval, B.E. ; Lim, D.S.S. ; Williams, D.R. ; Trembanis, A.C. ; Marinova, M.M. ; Shepard, R. ; Brady, A.L. ; Slater, G.F. ; Gernhardt, M.L. ; McKay, C.P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5aa7b9688ee8b116f3a9734421c371acbe0f1386a8165c420c1d0df7865176f13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Autonomous underwater vehicle</topic><topic>DeepWorker</topic><topic>Exploration metrics</topic><topic>Human–robotic interface</topic><topic>Performance metrics</topic><topic>Remotely operated vehicle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forrest, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laval, B.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, D.S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, D.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trembanis, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinova, M.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shepard, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brady, A.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slater, G.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gernhardt, M.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKay, C.P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Planetary and space science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forrest, A.L.</au><au>Laval, B.E.</au><au>Lim, D.S.S.</au><au>Williams, D.R.</au><au>Trembanis, A.C.</au><au>Marinova, M.M.</au><au>Shepard, R.</au><au>Brady, A.L.</au><au>Slater, G.F.</au><au>Gernhardt, M.L.</au><au>McKay, C.P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance evaluation of underwater platforms in the context of space exploration</atitle><jtitle>Planetary and space science</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>706</spage><epage>716</epage><pages>706-716</pages><issn>0032-0633</issn><eissn>1873-5088</eissn><abstract>Robotic platforms are essential for future human planetary and lunar exploration as they can operate in more extreme environments with a greater endurance than human explorers. In this era of space exploration, a terrestrial analog that can be used for development of the coordination between manned and robotic vehicles will optimize the scientific return of future missions while concurrently minimizing the downtime of both human explorers and robotic platforms. This work presents the use of underwater exploratory robots – autonomous underwater vehicles (AUV), remotely operated vehicles (ROV), and manned submersibles – as analogues for mixed human–robot exploration of space. Subaqueous settings present diverse challenges for navigation, operation and recovery that require the development of an exploration model of a similar complexity as required for space exploration. To capitalize on the strengths of both robotic and human explorers this work presents lessons learnt with respect to the fields of human–robotic interface (HRI) and operator training. These are then used in the development of mission evaluation tools: (1) a task efficiency index (TEI), (2) performance metrics, and (3) exploration metrics. Although these independent evaluations were useful for specific missions, further refinement will be required to fully evaluate the strengths and capabilities of multiple platforms in a human–robotic exploration campaign in order to take advantage of unforeseen science opportunities in remote settings.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pss.2009.08.007</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-0633
ispartof Planetary and space science, 2010-03, Vol.58 (4), p.706-716
issn 0032-0633
1873-5088
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877574426
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Autonomous underwater vehicle
DeepWorker
Exploration metrics
Human–robotic interface
Performance metrics
Remotely operated vehicle
title Performance evaluation of underwater platforms in the context of space exploration
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A21%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20evaluation%20of%20underwater%20platforms%20in%20the%20context%20of%20space%20exploration&rft.jtitle=Planetary%20and%20space%20science&rft.au=Forrest,%20A.L.&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=706&rft.epage=716&rft.pages=706-716&rft.issn=0032-0633&rft.eissn=1873-5088&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pss.2009.08.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E877574426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c329t-5aa7b9688ee8b116f3a9734421c371acbe0f1386a8165c420c1d0df7865176f13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=877574426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true