Loading…

Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression

We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modificat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Review of financial studies 2011-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1814-1847
Main Author: Ghent, Andra C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3
container_end_page 1847
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1814
container_title The Review of financial studies
container_volume 24
creator Ghent, Andra C.
description We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rfs/hhr017
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877839858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20869291</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20869291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1LAzEQgOEgCtbqxbsQvAjC2nxsNhtvUmsVWgQ_zks2O2m3tJuaZAX99UYrHjzNYR6G4UXolJIrShQfeRtGy6UnVO6hAc0LkUlelPtoQErFM5WL_BAdhbAihFCekwGaP4PpfRvbTx1b12HdNXjufFzoBeAn6GDhYvuzusaT97aBzgC23m1wXAKeetAR38LWQwjJHKMDq9cBTn7nEL3eTV7G99nscfowvpllhksRMyMlsboB4AwaawFAWc2YJgpqVnBTqlpzJQxvgClNRc0anXitCi6EAcuH6GJ3d-vdWw8hVps2GFivdQeuD1UpZclVKcokz__Jlet9l55LiCopaC4Tutwh410IHmy19e1G-4-Kkuq7a5W6VruuCZ_t8CpE5_8kI2WhmKL8CyLud9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871975147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Ghent, Andra C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghent, Andra C.</creatorcontrib><description>We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-9454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhr017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bank loans ; Commercial banks ; Economic crisis ; Financial history ; Foreclosure ; Foreclosures ; Great Depression ; Insurance providers ; Lenders ; Life insurance ; Loan rates ; Loans ; Mortgage credit ; Mortgage loans ; Mortgage markets ; Mortgages ; New York ; Real estate ; Real estate market ; Renegotiation ; Securitization ; Studies ; U.S.A ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>The Review of financial studies, 2011-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1814-1847</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 The Society for Financial Studies</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20869291$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20869291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,33221,33222,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghent, Andra C.</creatorcontrib><title>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</title><title>The Review of financial studies</title><description>We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages.</description><subject>Bank loans</subject><subject>Commercial banks</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Financial history</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Foreclosures</subject><subject>Great Depression</subject><subject>Insurance providers</subject><subject>Lenders</subject><subject>Life insurance</subject><subject>Loan rates</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Mortgage credit</subject><subject>Mortgage loans</subject><subject>Mortgage markets</subject><subject>Mortgages</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Real estate market</subject><subject>Renegotiation</subject><subject>Securitization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0893-9454</issn><issn>1465-7368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1LAzEQgOEgCtbqxbsQvAjC2nxsNhtvUmsVWgQ_zks2O2m3tJuaZAX99UYrHjzNYR6G4UXolJIrShQfeRtGy6UnVO6hAc0LkUlelPtoQErFM5WL_BAdhbAihFCekwGaP4PpfRvbTx1b12HdNXjufFzoBeAn6GDhYvuzusaT97aBzgC23m1wXAKeetAR38LWQwjJHKMDq9cBTn7nEL3eTV7G99nscfowvpllhksRMyMlsboB4AwaawFAWc2YJgpqVnBTqlpzJQxvgClNRc0anXitCi6EAcuH6GJ3d-vdWw8hVps2GFivdQeuD1UpZclVKcokz__Jlet9l55LiCopaC4Tutwh410IHmy19e1G-4-Kkuq7a5W6VruuCZ_t8CpE5_8kI2WhmKL8CyLud9Q</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Ghent, Andra C.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</title><author>Ghent, Andra C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bank loans</topic><topic>Commercial banks</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Financial history</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Foreclosures</topic><topic>Great Depression</topic><topic>Insurance providers</topic><topic>Lenders</topic><topic>Life insurance</topic><topic>Loan rates</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Mortgage credit</topic><topic>Mortgage loans</topic><topic>Mortgage markets</topic><topic>Mortgages</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Real estate market</topic><topic>Renegotiation</topic><topic>Securitization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghent, Andra C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghent, Andra C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</atitle><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1814</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1814-1847</pages><issn>0893-9454</issn><eissn>1465-7368</eissn><abstract>We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/rfs/hhr017</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0893-9454
ispartof The Review of financial studies, 2011-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1814-1847
issn 0893-9454
1465-7368
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877839858
source EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Oxford Journals Online
subjects Bank loans
Commercial banks
Economic crisis
Financial history
Foreclosure
Foreclosures
Great Depression
Insurance providers
Lenders
Life insurance
Loan rates
Loans
Mortgage credit
Mortgage loans
Mortgage markets
Mortgages
New York
Real estate
Real estate market
Renegotiation
Securitization
Studies
U.S.A
Urban areas
title Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A33%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Securitization%20and%20Mortgage%20Renegotiation:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Great%20Depression&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20financial%20studies&rft.au=Ghent,%20Andra%20C.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1814&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1814-1847&rft.issn=0893-9454&rft.eissn=1465-7368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rfs/hhr017&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20869291%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871975147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20869291&rfr_iscdi=true