Loading…
Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression
We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modificat...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Review of financial studies 2011-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1814-1847 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3 |
container_end_page | 1847 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1814 |
container_title | The Review of financial studies |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Ghent, Andra C. |
description | We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rfs/hhr017 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877839858</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>20869291</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20869291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0E1LAzEQgOEgCtbqxbsQvAjC2nxsNhtvUmsVWgQ_zks2O2m3tJuaZAX99UYrHjzNYR6G4UXolJIrShQfeRtGy6UnVO6hAc0LkUlelPtoQErFM5WL_BAdhbAihFCekwGaP4PpfRvbTx1b12HdNXjufFzoBeAn6GDhYvuzusaT97aBzgC23m1wXAKeetAR38LWQwjJHKMDq9cBTn7nEL3eTV7G99nscfowvpllhksRMyMlsboB4AwaawFAWc2YJgpqVnBTqlpzJQxvgClNRc0anXitCi6EAcuH6GJ3d-vdWw8hVps2GFivdQeuD1UpZclVKcokz__Jlet9l55LiCopaC4Tutwh410IHmy19e1G-4-Kkuq7a5W6VruuCZ_t8CpE5_8kI2WhmKL8CyLud9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871975147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Ghent, Andra C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ghent, Andra C.</creatorcontrib><description>We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0893-9454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1465-7368</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhr017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Bank loans ; Commercial banks ; Economic crisis ; Financial history ; Foreclosure ; Foreclosures ; Great Depression ; Insurance providers ; Lenders ; Life insurance ; Loan rates ; Loans ; Mortgage credit ; Mortgage loans ; Mortgage markets ; Mortgages ; New York ; Real estate ; Real estate market ; Renegotiation ; Securitization ; Studies ; U.S.A ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>The Review of financial studies, 2011-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1814-1847</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 The Society for Financial Studies</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20869291$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20869291$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,33221,33222,58236,58469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ghent, Andra C.</creatorcontrib><title>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</title><title>The Review of financial studies</title><description>We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages.</description><subject>Bank loans</subject><subject>Commercial banks</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Financial history</subject><subject>Foreclosure</subject><subject>Foreclosures</subject><subject>Great Depression</subject><subject>Insurance providers</subject><subject>Lenders</subject><subject>Life insurance</subject><subject>Loan rates</subject><subject>Loans</subject><subject>Mortgage credit</subject><subject>Mortgage loans</subject><subject>Mortgage markets</subject><subject>Mortgages</subject><subject>New York</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Real estate market</subject><subject>Renegotiation</subject><subject>Securitization</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0893-9454</issn><issn>1465-7368</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpd0E1LAzEQgOEgCtbqxbsQvAjC2nxsNhtvUmsVWgQ_zks2O2m3tJuaZAX99UYrHjzNYR6G4UXolJIrShQfeRtGy6UnVO6hAc0LkUlelPtoQErFM5WL_BAdhbAihFCekwGaP4PpfRvbTx1b12HdNXjufFzoBeAn6GDhYvuzusaT97aBzgC23m1wXAKeetAR38LWQwjJHKMDq9cBTn7nEL3eTV7G99nscfowvpllhksRMyMlsboB4AwaawFAWc2YJgpqVnBTqlpzJQxvgClNRc0anXitCi6EAcuH6GJ3d-vdWw8hVps2GFivdQeuD1UpZclVKcokz__Jlet9l55LiCopaC4Tutwh410IHmy19e1G-4-Kkuq7a5W6VruuCZ_t8CpE5_8kI2WhmKL8CyLud9Q</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Ghent, Andra C.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</title><author>Ghent, Andra C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bank loans</topic><topic>Commercial banks</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Financial history</topic><topic>Foreclosure</topic><topic>Foreclosures</topic><topic>Great Depression</topic><topic>Insurance providers</topic><topic>Lenders</topic><topic>Life insurance</topic><topic>Loan rates</topic><topic>Loans</topic><topic>Mortgage credit</topic><topic>Mortgage loans</topic><topic>Mortgage markets</topic><topic>Mortgages</topic><topic>New York</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Real estate market</topic><topic>Renegotiation</topic><topic>Securitization</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ghent, Andra C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ghent, Andra C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression</atitle><jtitle>The Review of financial studies</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1814</spage><epage>1847</epage><pages>1814-1847</pages><issn>0893-9454</issn><eissn>1465-7368</eissn><abstract>We use loan-level data from the New York City metropolitan area to examine the extent to which lenders attempted to prevent foreclosures with concessionary modifications during the Great Depression. We find no principal forgiveness in the sample and only a handful of concessionary mortgage modifications of other types. Far more mortgages terminated through foreclosure than received any sort of concessionary modification. The results indicate that there are significant impediments to renegotiation of residential mortgages beyond securitization. As such, less renegotiation seems unlikely to be a major cost of securitization of residential mortgages.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/rfs/hhr017</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0893-9454 |
ispartof | The Review of financial studies, 2011-06, Vol.24 (6), p.1814-1847 |
issn | 0893-9454 1465-7368 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_877839858 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Bank loans Commercial banks Economic crisis Financial history Foreclosure Foreclosures Great Depression Insurance providers Lenders Life insurance Loan rates Loans Mortgage credit Mortgage loans Mortgage markets Mortgages New York Real estate Real estate market Renegotiation Securitization Studies U.S.A Urban areas |
title | Securitization and Mortgage Renegotiation: Evidence from the Great Depression |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T10%3A33%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Securitization%20and%20Mortgage%20Renegotiation:%20Evidence%20from%20the%20Great%20Depression&rft.jtitle=The%20Review%20of%20financial%20studies&rft.au=Ghent,%20Andra%20C.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1814&rft.epage=1847&rft.pages=1814-1847&rft.issn=0893-9454&rft.eissn=1465-7368&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rfs/hhr017&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E20869291%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c770fadee32edffeee9fa22a09eb263c89ba395c3de29a15b2daadeb96355cef3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871975147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=20869291&rfr_iscdi=true |