Association between ambulatory physical activity and injuries during United States Army Basic Combat Training

Associations between physical activity and injuries have been previously examined using self-reports. The present investigation examined this association using objective measures of activity and injury. To quantify ambulatory activity, pedometers were worn daily by recruits in 10 Army Basic Combat T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physical activity & health 2011-05, Vol.8 (4), p.496-502
Main Authors: Knapik, Joseph J, Hauret, Keith G, Canada, Sara, Marin, Roberto, Jones, Bruce
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Exercise
Female
Humans
Injuries
Male
Medical Records - statistics & numerical data
Military Personnel
Military training
Monitoring, Physiologic - instrumentation
Monitoring, Physiologic - methods
Motor Activity - physiology
Physical Education and Training
Risk Factors
United States - epidemiology
Wounds and Injuries - epidemiology
Wounds and Injuries - etiology
Young Adult
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Associations between physical activity and injuries have been previously examined using self-reports. The present investigation examined this association using objective measures of activity and injury. To quantify ambulatory activity, pedometers were worn daily by recruits in 10 Army Basic Combat Training companies during the 9-week training cycle. Injuries were obtained from a medical surveillance system, defined as traumatic or overuse events resulting in a medical care provider visit. A daily questionnaire documented whether or not recruits wore the pedometers and trained with their companies for the entire day. Training companies were categorized by activity level into 3 groups with higher activity (HA, 17,948±550 steps/day), 4 with moderate activity (MA, 16,346±768 steps/day) and 3 with lower activity (LA, 14,772±400 steps/day). Among men, the MA and HA groups were at 1.52 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]=1.15-2.01) and 1.94 (95% CI=1.46-2.61) times higher injury risk, respectively, compared with the LA group. Among women, the MA and HA groups were at 1.36 (95% CI=1.07-1.73) and 1.53 (95% CI=1.24-1.89) times higher injury risk, respectively, compared with low LA group. The relationships remained significant after considering physical characteristics and physical fitness. In consonance with previous self-report studies, higher physical activity was associated with higher injury risk.
ISSN:1543-3080
1543-5474
DOI:10.1123/jpah.8.4.496