A method for better positioning bipolar electrodes for lower limb EMG recordings during dynamic contractions

• Published in: Journal of neuroscience methods 2009-05, Vol.180 (1), p.133-137
• Main Authors: Sacco, Isabel C.N., Gomes, Aline A., Otuzi, Mitie E., Pripas, Denise, Onodera, Andrea N.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Electrode; Electrode positioning; Electrodes - standards; Electrodiagnosis - instrumentation; Electrodiagnosis - methods; Electromyography; Electromyography - instrumentation; Electromyography - methods; Female; Humans; Leg - innervation; Leg - physiology; Lower extremity; Movement - physiology; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - innervation; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Predictive Value of Tests; Quadriceps Muscle - innervation; Quadriceps Muscle - physiology; Sensitivity and Specificity; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted - instrumentation; Standardization; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0165-0270; 1872-678X
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.02.017

To obtain a high quality EMG acquisition, the signal must be recorded as far away as possible from muscle innervations and tendon zones, which are known to shift during dynamic contractions. This study describes a methodology, using commercial bipolar electrodes, to identify better electrode positions for superficial EMG of lower limb muscles during dynamic contractions. Eight female volunteers participated in this study. Myoelectric signals of the vastus lateralis, gastrocnemius medialis, peroneus longus and tibialis anterior muscles were acquired during maximum isometric contractions using bipolar electrodes. The electrode positions of each muscle were selected assessing SENIAM and then, other positions were located along the length of muscle up and down the SENIAM site. The raw signal (density), the linear envelopes, the RMS value, the motor point site, the position of the IZ and its shift during dynamic contractions were taken into account to select and compare electrode positions. For vastus lateralis and peroneus longus, the best sites were 66% and 25% of muscle length, respectively (similar to SENIAM location). The position of the tibialis anterior electrodes presented the best signal at 47.5% of its length (different from SENIAM location). The position of the gastrocnemius medialis electrodes was at 38% of its length and SENIAM does not specify a precise location for signal acquisition. The proposed method should be considered as another methodological step in every EMG study to guarantee the quality of the signal and subsequent human movement interpretations.