Loading…

Donepezil for treatment of cognitive dysfunction in children with Down syndrome aged 10-17

The objective of this 10‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and safety of donepezil for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction exhibited by children with Down syndrome (DS). Intervention comprised donepezil (2.5–10 mg/day) in children (age...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of medical genetics. Part A 2010-12, Vol.152A (12), p.3028-3035
Main Authors: Kishnani, Priya S., Heller, James H., Spiridigliozzi, Gail A., Lott, Ira, Escobar, Luis, Richardson, Sharon, Zhang, Richard, McRae, Thomas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective of this 10‐week, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled multicenter study was to assess the efficacy and safety of donepezil for the treatment of cognitive dysfunction exhibited by children with Down syndrome (DS). Intervention comprised donepezil (2.5–10 mg/day) in children (aged 10–17 years) with DS of mild‐to‐moderate severity. The primary measures were the Vineland‐II Adaptive Behavior Scales (VABS‐II) Parent/Caregiver Rating Form (PCRF) the sum of nine subdomain standardized scores and standard safety measures. Secondary measures included the VABS‐II/PCRF scores on the following domains and their respective individual subdomains: Communication (receptive, expressive, and written); Daily Living Skills (personal, domestic, and community); Socialization (interpersonal relationships, play and leisure time, and coping skills), and scores on the Test of Verbal Expression and Reasoning, a subject‐performance‐based measure of expressive language. At baseline, 129 participants were assigned treatment with donepezil or placebo. During the double‐blind phase, VABS II/PCRF sum of the nine subdomain standardized scores, called v‐scores, improved significantly from baseline in both groups (P 
ISSN:1552-4825
1552-4833
1552-4833
DOI:10.1002/ajmg.a.33730