Loading…
The use of a preformed spacer in two-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasties
Two-stage revision with the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer has spread widely as a successful treatment for THA infection. Between 1999 and 2008, 28 patients with infected THA were treated with two-stage implant revision using a preformed spacer. The spacer was left in situ for 5.5 months...
Saved in:
Published in: | Musculoskeletal surgery 2011-08, Vol.95 (2), p.115-120 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Two-stage revision with the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer has spread widely as a successful treatment for THA infection. Between 1999 and 2008, 28 patients with infected THA were treated with two-stage implant revision using a preformed spacer. The spacer was left in situ for 5.5 months (range 1–13 months), and the patients were allowed to walk with partial weight bearing. At a mean follow-up of 53 months (range 18–106 months), recurrence of infection was observed in only one patient. Complications were observed in five patients: three spacer dislocations, one distal femoral fracture occurred during stem removal, and one femoral artery pseudo-aneurysm. The mean HHS increased from 43 points (range 13–77) to 82 points (range 35–96). Though small prospective studies are reported in literature, good eradication rate and good functional outcomes encourage for the use of an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer. The industrial production ensures procedure standardization, well-defined physical and chemical properties to the device and eliminates time necessary to intraoperatory manufacturing. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2035-5106 2035-5114 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12306-011-0128-5 |