Loading…

CO2 Response and Duration of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

The CO2 response test measures the hypercapnic drive response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in airway-occlusion pressure 0.1 s after the start of inspiratory flow [ΔP(0.1)] to the change in P(aCO2) [ΔP(aCO2)]), and the hypercapnic ventilatory response (which is defined as the ratio of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Respiratory care 2011-08, Vol.56 (8), p.1130-1136
Main Authors: RAURICH, Joan Maria, RIALP, Gemma, IBANEZ, Jordi, LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni, AYESTARAN, Ignacio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1136
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1130
container_title Respiratory care
container_volume 56
creator RAURICH, Joan Maria
RIALP, Gemma
IBANEZ, Jordi
LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni
AYESTARAN, Ignacio
description The CO2 response test measures the hypercapnic drive response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in airway-occlusion pressure 0.1 s after the start of inspiratory flow [ΔP(0.1)] to the change in P(aCO2) [ΔP(aCO2)]), and the hypercapnic ventilatory response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in minute volume to ΔP(aCO2)). In mechanically ventilated patients ready for a spontaneous breathing trial, to investigate the relationship between CO2 response and the duration of weaning. We conducted the CO2 response test and measured maximum inspiratory pressure (P(Imax)) and maximum expiratory pressure (P(Emax)) in 102 non-consecutive ventilated patients. We categorized the patients as either prolonged weaning (weaning duration > 7 d) or non-prolonged weaning (≤ 7 d). Twenty-seven patients had prolonged weaning. Between the prolonged and non-prolonged weaning groups we found differences in hypercapnic drive response (0.22 ± 0.16 cm H2O/mm Hg vs 0.47 ± 0.22 cm H2O/mm Hg, respectively, P < .001) and hypercapnic ventilatory response (0.25 ± 0.23 L/min/mm Hg vs 0.53 ± 0.33 L/min/mm Hg, respectively, P < .001). The optimal cutoff points to differentiate between prolonged and non-prolonged weaning were 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg for hypercapnic drive response, and 0.15 L/min/mm Hg for hypercapnic ventilatory response. Assessed with the Cox proportional hazards model, both hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response were independent variables associated with the duration of weaning. The hazard ratio of weaning success was 16.7 times higher if hypercapnic drive response was > 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg, and 6.3 times higher if hypercapnic ventilatory response was > 0.15 L/min/mm Hg. Other variables (P(0.1), P(Imax), and P(Emax)) were not associated with the duration of the weaning. Decreased CO2 response, as measured by hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response, are associated with prolonged weaning.
doi_str_mv 10.4187/respcare.01080
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880719891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>880719891</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p155t-bacebe4feb7952753f16dc836ccf667eef13cad7b2809c274cd1a37a8003bfde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFz8tLxDAYBPAgiruuXj1KLuKpmlfzuCmrq8LKgvg4ljT9opU2rUl78L-36IqnYeDHwCB0TMm5oFpdREi9sxHOCSWa7KA5NYJnXOZiF80JYSSjnIkZOkjpY6pS5GYfzRgVRnIp5-hyuWH4cRrpQgJsQ4Wvx2iHugu48_gVbKjDG17FrsUP4N6n6myDXyAMdfPDDtGet02Co20u0PPq5ml5l603t_fLq3XW0zwfstI6KEF4KJXJmcq5p7JymkvnvJQKwFPubKVKpolxTAlXUcuV1YTw0lfAF-jsd7eP3ecIaSjaOjloGhugG1OhNVHUaEMnebKVY9lCVfSxbm38Kv5OT-B0C2ya3vhog6vTvxOCSSo0_wYqCmbr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>880719891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CO2 Response and Duration of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation</title><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>RAURICH, Joan Maria ; RIALP, Gemma ; IBANEZ, Jordi ; LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni ; AYESTARAN, Ignacio</creator><creatorcontrib>RAURICH, Joan Maria ; RIALP, Gemma ; IBANEZ, Jordi ; LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni ; AYESTARAN, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><description>The CO2 response test measures the hypercapnic drive response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in airway-occlusion pressure 0.1 s after the start of inspiratory flow [ΔP(0.1)] to the change in P(aCO2) [ΔP(aCO2)]), and the hypercapnic ventilatory response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in minute volume to ΔP(aCO2)). In mechanically ventilated patients ready for a spontaneous breathing trial, to investigate the relationship between CO2 response and the duration of weaning. We conducted the CO2 response test and measured maximum inspiratory pressure (P(Imax)) and maximum expiratory pressure (P(Emax)) in 102 non-consecutive ventilated patients. We categorized the patients as either prolonged weaning (weaning duration &gt; 7 d) or non-prolonged weaning (≤ 7 d). Twenty-seven patients had prolonged weaning. Between the prolonged and non-prolonged weaning groups we found differences in hypercapnic drive response (0.22 ± 0.16 cm H2O/mm Hg vs 0.47 ± 0.22 cm H2O/mm Hg, respectively, P &lt; .001) and hypercapnic ventilatory response (0.25 ± 0.23 L/min/mm Hg vs 0.53 ± 0.33 L/min/mm Hg, respectively, P &lt; .001). The optimal cutoff points to differentiate between prolonged and non-prolonged weaning were 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg for hypercapnic drive response, and 0.15 L/min/mm Hg for hypercapnic ventilatory response. Assessed with the Cox proportional hazards model, both hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response were independent variables associated with the duration of weaning. The hazard ratio of weaning success was 16.7 times higher if hypercapnic drive response was &gt; 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg, and 6.3 times higher if hypercapnic ventilatory response was &gt; 0.15 L/min/mm Hg. Other variables (P(0.1), P(Imax), and P(Emax)) were not associated with the duration of the weaning. Decreased CO2 response, as measured by hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response, are associated with prolonged weaning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1324</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4187/respcare.01080</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21496366</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RECACP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Irving, TX: Daedalus</publisher><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Biological and medical sciences ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Emergency and intensive respiratory care ; Exhalation ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Hypercapnia - etiology ; Hypercapnia - metabolism ; Hypercapnia - physiopathology ; Intensive care medicine ; Intensive Care Units ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Respiratory Mechanics - physiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Ventilator Weaning</subject><ispartof>Respiratory care, 2011-08, Vol.56 (8), p.1130-1136</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24426148$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496366$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>RAURICH, Joan Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIALP, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IBANEZ, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AYESTARAN, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><title>CO2 Response and Duration of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation</title><title>Respiratory care</title><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><description>The CO2 response test measures the hypercapnic drive response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in airway-occlusion pressure 0.1 s after the start of inspiratory flow [ΔP(0.1)] to the change in P(aCO2) [ΔP(aCO2)]), and the hypercapnic ventilatory response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in minute volume to ΔP(aCO2)). In mechanically ventilated patients ready for a spontaneous breathing trial, to investigate the relationship between CO2 response and the duration of weaning. We conducted the CO2 response test and measured maximum inspiratory pressure (P(Imax)) and maximum expiratory pressure (P(Emax)) in 102 non-consecutive ventilated patients. We categorized the patients as either prolonged weaning (weaning duration &gt; 7 d) or non-prolonged weaning (≤ 7 d). Twenty-seven patients had prolonged weaning. Between the prolonged and non-prolonged weaning groups we found differences in hypercapnic drive response (0.22 ± 0.16 cm H2O/mm Hg vs 0.47 ± 0.22 cm H2O/mm Hg, respectively, P &lt; .001) and hypercapnic ventilatory response (0.25 ± 0.23 L/min/mm Hg vs 0.53 ± 0.33 L/min/mm Hg, respectively, P &lt; .001). The optimal cutoff points to differentiate between prolonged and non-prolonged weaning were 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg for hypercapnic drive response, and 0.15 L/min/mm Hg for hypercapnic ventilatory response. Assessed with the Cox proportional hazards model, both hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response were independent variables associated with the duration of weaning. The hazard ratio of weaning success was 16.7 times higher if hypercapnic drive response was &gt; 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg, and 6.3 times higher if hypercapnic ventilatory response was &gt; 0.15 L/min/mm Hg. Other variables (P(0.1), P(Imax), and P(Emax)) were not associated with the duration of the weaning. Decreased CO2 response, as measured by hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response, are associated with prolonged weaning.</description><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</subject><subject>Exhalation</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypercapnia - etiology</subject><subject>Hypercapnia - metabolism</subject><subject>Hypercapnia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Respiratory Mechanics - physiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Ventilator Weaning</subject><issn>0020-1324</issn><issn>1943-3654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFz8tLxDAYBPAgiruuXj1KLuKpmlfzuCmrq8LKgvg4ljT9opU2rUl78L-36IqnYeDHwCB0TMm5oFpdREi9sxHOCSWa7KA5NYJnXOZiF80JYSSjnIkZOkjpY6pS5GYfzRgVRnIp5-hyuWH4cRrpQgJsQ4Wvx2iHugu48_gVbKjDG17FrsUP4N6n6myDXyAMdfPDDtGet02Co20u0PPq5ml5l603t_fLq3XW0zwfstI6KEF4KJXJmcq5p7JymkvnvJQKwFPubKVKpolxTAlXUcuV1YTw0lfAF-jsd7eP3ecIaSjaOjloGhugG1OhNVHUaEMnebKVY9lCVfSxbm38Kv5OT-B0C2ya3vhog6vTvxOCSSo0_wYqCmbr</recordid><startdate>201108</startdate><enddate>201108</enddate><creator>RAURICH, Joan Maria</creator><creator>RIALP, Gemma</creator><creator>IBANEZ, Jordi</creator><creator>LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni</creator><creator>AYESTARAN, Ignacio</creator><general>Daedalus</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201108</creationdate><title>CO2 Response and Duration of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation</title><author>RAURICH, Joan Maria ; RIALP, Gemma ; IBANEZ, Jordi ; LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni ; AYESTARAN, Ignacio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p155t-bacebe4feb7952753f16dc836ccf667eef13cad7b2809c274cd1a37a8003bfde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive respiratory care</topic><topic>Exhalation</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypercapnia - etiology</topic><topic>Hypercapnia - metabolism</topic><topic>Hypercapnia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Respiratory Mechanics - physiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Ventilator Weaning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>RAURICH, Joan Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RIALP, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IBANEZ, Jordi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AYESTARAN, Ignacio</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>RAURICH, Joan Maria</au><au>RIALP, Gemma</au><au>IBANEZ, Jordi</au><au>LLOMPART-POU, Joan Antoni</au><au>AYESTARAN, Ignacio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CO2 Response and Duration of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle><addtitle>Respir Care</addtitle><date>2011-08</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1130</spage><epage>1136</epage><pages>1130-1136</pages><issn>0020-1324</issn><eissn>1943-3654</eissn><coden>RECACP</coden><abstract>The CO2 response test measures the hypercapnic drive response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in airway-occlusion pressure 0.1 s after the start of inspiratory flow [ΔP(0.1)] to the change in P(aCO2) [ΔP(aCO2)]), and the hypercapnic ventilatory response (which is defined as the ratio of the change in minute volume to ΔP(aCO2)). In mechanically ventilated patients ready for a spontaneous breathing trial, to investigate the relationship between CO2 response and the duration of weaning. We conducted the CO2 response test and measured maximum inspiratory pressure (P(Imax)) and maximum expiratory pressure (P(Emax)) in 102 non-consecutive ventilated patients. We categorized the patients as either prolonged weaning (weaning duration &gt; 7 d) or non-prolonged weaning (≤ 7 d). Twenty-seven patients had prolonged weaning. Between the prolonged and non-prolonged weaning groups we found differences in hypercapnic drive response (0.22 ± 0.16 cm H2O/mm Hg vs 0.47 ± 0.22 cm H2O/mm Hg, respectively, P &lt; .001) and hypercapnic ventilatory response (0.25 ± 0.23 L/min/mm Hg vs 0.53 ± 0.33 L/min/mm Hg, respectively, P &lt; .001). The optimal cutoff points to differentiate between prolonged and non-prolonged weaning were 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg for hypercapnic drive response, and 0.15 L/min/mm Hg for hypercapnic ventilatory response. Assessed with the Cox proportional hazards model, both hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response were independent variables associated with the duration of weaning. The hazard ratio of weaning success was 16.7 times higher if hypercapnic drive response was &gt; 0.19 cm H2O/mm Hg, and 6.3 times higher if hypercapnic ventilatory response was &gt; 0.15 L/min/mm Hg. Other variables (P(0.1), P(Imax), and P(Emax)) were not associated with the duration of the weaning. Decreased CO2 response, as measured by hypercapnic drive response and hypercapnic ventilatory response, are associated with prolonged weaning.</abstract><cop>Irving, TX</cop><pub>Daedalus</pub><pmid>21496366</pmid><doi>10.4187/respcare.01080</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1324
ispartof Respiratory care, 2011-08, Vol.56 (8), p.1130-1136
issn 0020-1324
1943-3654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_880719891
source PubMed Central
subjects Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Biological and medical sciences
Carbon Dioxide - analysis
Emergency and intensive respiratory care
Exhalation
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Hypercapnia - etiology
Hypercapnia - metabolism
Hypercapnia - physiopathology
Intensive care medicine
Intensive Care Units
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Respiratory Mechanics - physiology
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Ventilator Weaning
title CO2 Response and Duration of Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T19%3A10%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CO2%20Response%20and%20Duration%20of%20Weaning%20From%20Mechanical%20Ventilation&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20care&rft.au=RAURICH,%20Joan%20Maria&rft.date=2011-08&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1130&rft.epage=1136&rft.pages=1130-1136&rft.issn=0020-1324&rft.eissn=1943-3654&rft.coden=RECACP&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187/respcare.01080&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E880719891%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p155t-bacebe4feb7952753f16dc836ccf667eef13cad7b2809c274cd1a37a8003bfde3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=880719891&rft_id=info:pmid/21496366&rfr_iscdi=true