Loading…

Relative renal function with MAG-3 and DMSA in children with unilateral hydronephrosis

Aim Tc-99m DMSA renal cortical scan is a reference method for determining relative renal function (RRF). Tc-99m MAG-3 is also recommended for the estimation of RRF, particularly in young children. The aims of this study were to compare MAG-3 and DMSA RRF estimations and to assess the reproducibility...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Annals of nuclear medicine 2010-11, Vol.24 (9), p.691-695
Main Authors: Aktaş, Gül Ege, Inanir, Sabahat
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aim Tc-99m DMSA renal cortical scan is a reference method for determining relative renal function (RRF). Tc-99m MAG-3 is also recommended for the estimation of RRF, particularly in young children. The aims of this study were to compare MAG-3 and DMSA RRF estimations and to assess the reproducibility of these estimations in children with unilateral hydronephrosis. Methods We reviewed MAG-3 and DMSA scans of 19 children with unilateral hydronephrosis and a normal contralateral unit. All were imaged with 2 agents within 3 months. MAG-3 RRF was calculated using 2 different time intervals (1–2 and 2–3 min) and perirenal C-type region of background activity. No background correction method was used in the calculation of DMSA RRF. All data were processed twice by two independent operators. Results In the repeated estimates of MAG-3 RRF, the maximum mean intra-observer and inter-observer differences were 0.9% (SD 1.7%) and 1.4% (SD 3.3%), respectively. Intra-method analysis showed statistically significant agreement between repeated measures of RRF for two agents as well as for two operators (intra-class cross-correlation coefficients of early and later phase of MAG-3 and DMSA RRF values were 0.979, 0.993 and 0.996 for operator 1, and 0.986, 0.973 and 0.995 for operator 2, respectively; p  
ISSN:0914-7187
1864-6433
DOI:10.1007/s12149-010-0397-3