Loading…
Treatment of azo dye Acid Orange 7 containing wastewater using up-flow constructed wetland with and without supplementary aeration
The aim of this study is to examine and compare the treatment performance of Acid Orange 7 (AO7) containing wastewater by up-flow constructed wetland (UFCW) at different AO7 concentrations, hydraulic retention times (HRT) and alternative of supplementary aeration. The aerated wetland reactor outperf...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioresource technology 2010-12, Vol.101 (23), p.9049-9057 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The aim of this study is to examine and compare the treatment performance of Acid Orange 7 (AO7) containing wastewater by up-flow constructed wetland (UFCW) at different AO7 concentrations, hydraulic retention times (HRT) and alternative of supplementary aeration. The aerated wetland reactor outperformed the non-aerated one in the removal of organic matters, NH
4-N and aromatic amines. The T-P removal efficiency for both wetland reactors was not much different throughout the study and the supplementary aeration showed no significant effect on T-P removal. As influent AO7 concentration increased from 50 to 100
mg/L, the performance in biodegradation of organic matters and nitrification in the non-aerated wetland reactor, and denitrification and decolorization in the aerated wetland reactor were affected. As HRT increased from 3 to 6
d, the removal of NH
4-N and NO
3-N in the aerated wetland reactor was not significantly different, but the NH
4-N removal efficiency improved tremendously in the non-aerated wetland reactor. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.07.034 |