The influence of extrinsic motivation on competition-based selection

• Published in: Behavioural brain research 2011-10, Vol.224 (1), p.58-64
• Main Authors: Sänger, Jessica, Wascher, Edmund
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Attention; Attention - physiology; Behavioral psychophysiology; Biological and medical sciences; Choice Behavior - physiology; Competition; Competitive Behavior - physiology; EEG; Electroencephalography - methods; ERP; Event-related potentials; Evoked Potentials - physiology; Female; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Goals; Humans; Male; Motivation; Motivation - physiology; N2pc; Orientation - physiology; Photic Stimulation; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychology. Psychophysiology; Reaction Time - physiology; Reward; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0166-4328; 1872-7549
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.05.015

► The present study examined the influence of extrinsic motivation (by announcing a reward) on the competitive attentional selection. ► Extrinsic motivation led to reduced error rates if attentional conflict was high. ► Extrinsic motivation was accompanied by enhanced fronto-central activity (N2 of the ERP). ► The N1pc and N2pc of the EEG varied with the strength of the attentional conflict. ► The N2pc was additionally enhanced in the motivation condition. The biased competition approach to visuo-spatial attention proposes that the selection of competing information is effected by the saliency of the stimulus as well as by an intention-based bias of attention towards behavioural goals. Wascher and Beste (2010) [32] showed that the detection of relevant information depends on its relative saliency compared to irrelevant conflicting stimuli. Furthermore the N1pc, N2pc and N2 of the EEG varied with the strength of the conflict. However, this system could also be modulated by rather global mechanisms like attentional effort. The present study investigates such modulations by testing the influence of extrinsic motivation on the selection of competing stimuli. Participants had to detect a luminance change in various conditions among others against an irrelevant orientation change. Half of the participants were motivated to maximize their performance by the announcement of a monetary reward for correct responses. Participants who were motivated had lower error rates than participants who were not motivated. The event-related lateralizations of the EEG showed no motivation-related effect on the N1pc, which reflects the initial saliency driven orientation of attention towards the more salient stimulus. The subsequent N2pc was enhanced in the motivation condition. Extrinsic motivation was also accompanied by enhanced fronto-central negativities. Thus, the data provide evidence that the improvement of selection performance when participants were extrinsically motivated by announcing a reward was not due to changes in the initial saliency based processing of information but was foremost mediated by improved higher-level mechanisms.