Early immunodiagnosis of Ganoderma infecting coconut seedlings and palms by using monospecific polyclonal antibodies

• Published in: Archiv für Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschutz 2010-11, Vol.43 (17), p.1693-1709
• Main Authors: Kandan, A., Ramanathan, A., Raguchander, T., Balasubramanian, P., Samiyappan, R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Antibodies; Antisera; Crops; Cross-reaction; Cross-reactivity; Developmental stages; diagnosis; DIBA; ELISA; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; Ganoderma; Immunodiagnosis; Infection; Leaves; Limiting factors; Oil; Pathogenicity; Plant diseases; Plant protection; Roots; Seedlings; Sporophores; Stem rot
• ISSN: 0323-5408; 1477-2906
• DOI: 10.1080/03235400802538465

Among the various fungal diseases affecting plantation crops viz., coconut, aracanut, oil palm, etc. in India, basal stem rot (BSR) caused by species of Ganoderma is the most destructive. A limiting factor in controlling the BSR disease is the lack of reliable diagnostic method(s) for early diagnosis. In this study we generated two different types of antiserum for diagnosis of Ganoderma using the purified monospecific protein (62 kDa) (MS) and crude sporophore extract (SE). We also tested the cross-reactivity with the soil-borne and saprophytic fungus collected from different parts of coconut palm. The antiserum developed against the MS and SE showed 1:700 and 1:3000 titre values for the detection of Ganoderma. The MS antisera developed showed very low or almost no cross-reaction when compared to SE antisera of Ganoderma. In the DIBA test, at a 1:10 dilution of antigen, 1:1000 dilution of CMP and ECP antisera, 1:5000 dilution of secondary antibody gave clear distinctions in colour development between healthy and diseased samples. In DIBA test, both types of antisera were used separately for pathogenicity tests. MS antisera showed a positive reaction for purified protein, artificially infected roots and infected field palm. A mild reaction was observed against infected field trunk but a negative reaction was observed for lesions and leaf samples. In the case of SE antisera, a negative reaction was observed for all leaf samples, healthy roots and healthy trunk samples but positive reactions were observed for positive control, artificially inoculated roots, infected field roots, infected trunk and lesions samples. Therefore, both ELISA and DIBA tests may be useful in the detection of infection at the earliest stage of disease development and this will certainly help in the development of management strategies against Ganoderma disease in palm crops in advance.