Loading…

Controversies About Induction Therapy

Abstract Induction therapy refers to the initiation of intense immunosuppression in the initial days after transplantation when the recipient's immune system contacts donor antigens for the first time. Induction therapy may also be used to permit delayed initiation of calcineurin inhibitors (CN...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transplantation proceedings 2011-07, Vol.43 (6), p.2450-2452
Main Authors: Ippoliti, G, Pellegrini, C, Nieswandt, V
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Induction therapy refers to the initiation of intense immunosuppression in the initial days after transplantation when the recipient's immune system contacts donor antigens for the first time. Induction therapy may also be used to permit delayed initiation of calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) for maintenance immunosuppression among patients with significant renal failure (RF). The rationale of its use is to provide intensive immunosuppression at the time when the alloimmune response is most intense. In general, induction therapy can be divided into 2 categories: depleting antibodies (eg, polyclonal antibodies [horse or rabbit antithymocyte globulin], anti-CD3 antibodies [OKT3], and human monoclonal anti-CD52 [alentuzumab]) and nondepleting antibodies (eg, anti-CD25 antibodies [daclizumab, basiliximab] or fusion proteins with natural binding properties currently being studied, eg, CTLA4-Ig [belatacept]). The advantages and disadvantages of induction therapy are discussed.
ISSN:0041-1345
1873-2623
DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.06.021