Loading…

Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue

Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Language and speech 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.147-165
Main Authors: Reinisch, Eva, Jesse, Alexandra, McQueen, James M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3
container_end_page 165
container_issue 2
container_start_page 147
container_title Language and speech
container_volume 54
creator Reinisch, Eva
Jesse, Alexandra
McQueen, James M.
description Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0023830910397489
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A260582233</galeid><ericid>EJ926213</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0023830910397489</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A260582233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstv1DAQxi0EokvhzgGBBQe4pPgZO8fVUl5aCURBHKNZZxxS8qqdSPS_r5ctpa0W5IMf8_tmPJ-GkMecHXFuzGvGhLSSFZzJwihb3CELbnSe5UzLu2SxDWfb-AF5EOMpS_dc2PvkQHCrLDNmQb6fjAg_m76mX2BCuvQe3RTp9APpZwwOx6kZejp4-mYO8PsMkQI9mccAEesO-wlausZfjYM2i1PAGOlqxofknoc24qPL_ZB8e3v8dfU-W39692G1XGdOWztlwDWKAmGjrPfpd05phlpVSngnTG42Iq8AQJuN8bICk-vKVgiKSYUarJOH5OUu7xiGsxnjVHZNdNi20OMwx9JapYQyXCXy1X_J5CGzhSy0TejzW-jpMIc-9VFaw6XWRbHN92wH1dBi2QZXwxxjuRTJfCuElIl4cY1oej9MAdy26k0q20PV2GOAdujRN-n5Bn-0h0-rwq5xewVsJ3BhiDGgL8fQdBDOU8vldozK22OUJE8vDZg3HVZXgj9zk4AnOwBD467Cxx-LNGD8Wk8Ravxr3j_rXQB94dNs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871355994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Reinisch, Eva ; Jesse, Alexandra ; McQueen, James M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Eva ; Jesse, Alexandra ; McQueen, James M.</creatorcontrib><description>Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0023830910397489</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21848077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANSA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accentuation ; Acoustic Stimulation ; Audiometry, Speech ; Behavior ; Context ; Cues ; Dutch language ; Evaluation Methods ; Experiments ; Foreign Countries ; Humans ; Investigations ; Language Arts ; Lexicology ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Netherlands ; Perceptions ; Phonemes ; Phonemics ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Sentences ; Sound duration ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Communication ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Speech rate ; Stimuli ; Stress ; Suprasegmentals ; Syllables ; Time Factors ; Time Perception ; Vocabulary development ; Voice recognition ; Vowels ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Language and speech, 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.147-165</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871355994?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,12861,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,34775,34776,43733,43880,43896,44200,62661,62662,62664,62677,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ926213$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21848077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesse, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, James M.</creatorcontrib><title>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</title><title>Language and speech</title><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><description>Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.</description><subject>Accentuation</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Lexicology</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Phonemes</subject><subject>Phonemics</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Sound duration</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech rate</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Suprasegmentals</subject><subject>Syllables</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Vocabulary development</subject><subject>Voice recognition</subject><subject>Vowels</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0023-8309</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstv1DAQxi0EokvhzgGBBQe4pPgZO8fVUl5aCURBHKNZZxxS8qqdSPS_r5ctpa0W5IMf8_tmPJ-GkMecHXFuzGvGhLSSFZzJwihb3CELbnSe5UzLu2SxDWfb-AF5EOMpS_dc2PvkQHCrLDNmQb6fjAg_m76mX2BCuvQe3RTp9APpZwwOx6kZejp4-mYO8PsMkQI9mccAEesO-wlausZfjYM2i1PAGOlqxofknoc24qPL_ZB8e3v8dfU-W39692G1XGdOWztlwDWKAmGjrPfpd05phlpVSngnTG42Iq8AQJuN8bICk-vKVgiKSYUarJOH5OUu7xiGsxnjVHZNdNi20OMwx9JapYQyXCXy1X_J5CGzhSy0TejzW-jpMIc-9VFaw6XWRbHN92wH1dBi2QZXwxxjuRTJfCuElIl4cY1oej9MAdy26k0q20PV2GOAdujRN-n5Bn-0h0-rwq5xewVsJ3BhiDGgL8fQdBDOU8vldozK22OUJE8vDZg3HVZXgj9zk4AnOwBD467Cxx-LNGD8Wk8Ravxr3j_rXQB94dNs</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Reinisch, Eva</creator><creator>Jesse, Alexandra</creator><creator>McQueen, James M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</title><author>Reinisch, Eva ; Jesse, Alexandra ; McQueen, James M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accentuation</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Lexicology</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Phonemes</topic><topic>Phonemics</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Sound duration</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech rate</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Suprasegmentals</topic><topic>Syllables</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Vocabulary development</topic><topic>Voice recognition</topic><topic>Vowels</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesse, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, James M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reinisch, Eva</au><au>Jesse, Alexandra</au><au>McQueen, James M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ926213</ericid><atitle>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</atitle><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>147-165</pages><issn>0023-8309</issn><eissn>1756-6053</eissn><coden>LANSA4</coden><abstract>Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21848077</pmid><doi>10.1177/0023830910397489</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-8309
ispartof Language and speech, 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.147-165
issn 0023-8309
1756-6053
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424714
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sage Journals Online; Education Collection
subjects Accentuation
Acoustic Stimulation
Audiometry, Speech
Behavior
Context
Cues
Dutch language
Evaluation Methods
Experiments
Foreign Countries
Humans
Investigations
Language Arts
Lexicology
Linguistics
Listening Comprehension
Netherlands
Perceptions
Phonemes
Phonemics
Phonetics
Phonology
Recognition (Psychology)
Sentences
Sound duration
Speech
Speech Acoustics
Speech Communication
Speech Intelligibility
Speech Perception
Speech rate
Stimuli
Stress
Suprasegmentals
Syllables
Time Factors
Time Perception
Vocabulary development
Voice recognition
Vowels
Word Recognition
title Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Speaking%20Rate%20Affects%20the%20Perception%20of%20Duration%20as%20a%20Suprasegmental%20Lexical-stress%20Cue&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20speech&rft.au=Reinisch,%20Eva&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=147-165&rft.issn=0023-8309&rft.eissn=1756-6053&rft.coden=LANSA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0023830910397489&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA260582233%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871355994&rft_id=info:pmid/21848077&rft_galeid=A260582233&rft_ericid=EJ926213&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0023830910397489&rfr_iscdi=true