Loading…
Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue
Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment...
Saved in:
Published in: | Language and speech 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.147-165 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3 |
container_end_page | 165 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 147 |
container_title | Language and speech |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Reinisch, Eva Jesse, Alexandra McQueen, James M. |
description | Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0023830910397489 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424714</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A260582233</galeid><ericid>EJ926213</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_0023830910397489</sage_id><sourcerecordid>A260582233</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstv1DAQxi0EokvhzgGBBQe4pPgZO8fVUl5aCURBHKNZZxxS8qqdSPS_r5ctpa0W5IMf8_tmPJ-GkMecHXFuzGvGhLSSFZzJwihb3CELbnSe5UzLu2SxDWfb-AF5EOMpS_dc2PvkQHCrLDNmQb6fjAg_m76mX2BCuvQe3RTp9APpZwwOx6kZejp4-mYO8PsMkQI9mccAEesO-wlausZfjYM2i1PAGOlqxofknoc24qPL_ZB8e3v8dfU-W39692G1XGdOWztlwDWKAmGjrPfpd05phlpVSngnTG42Iq8AQJuN8bICk-vKVgiKSYUarJOH5OUu7xiGsxnjVHZNdNi20OMwx9JapYQyXCXy1X_J5CGzhSy0TejzW-jpMIc-9VFaw6XWRbHN92wH1dBi2QZXwxxjuRTJfCuElIl4cY1oej9MAdy26k0q20PV2GOAdujRN-n5Bn-0h0-rwq5xewVsJ3BhiDGgL8fQdBDOU8vldozK22OUJE8vDZg3HVZXgj9zk4AnOwBD467Cxx-LNGD8Wk8Ravxr3j_rXQB94dNs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>871355994</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Reinisch, Eva ; Jesse, Alexandra ; McQueen, James M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Eva ; Jesse, Alexandra ; McQueen, James M.</creatorcontrib><description>Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-8309</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-6053</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0023830910397489</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21848077</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LANSA4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accentuation ; Acoustic Stimulation ; Audiometry, Speech ; Behavior ; Context ; Cues ; Dutch language ; Evaluation Methods ; Experiments ; Foreign Countries ; Humans ; Investigations ; Language Arts ; Lexicology ; Linguistics ; Listening Comprehension ; Netherlands ; Perceptions ; Phonemes ; Phonemics ; Phonetics ; Phonology ; Recognition (Psychology) ; Sentences ; Sound duration ; Speech ; Speech Acoustics ; Speech Communication ; Speech Intelligibility ; Speech Perception ; Speech rate ; Stimuli ; Stress ; Suprasegmentals ; Syllables ; Time Factors ; Time Perception ; Vocabulary development ; Voice recognition ; Vowels ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>Language and speech, 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.147-165</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2011</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</rights><rights>Copyright Sage Publications Ltd. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/871355994?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,12861,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,34775,34776,43733,43880,43896,44200,62661,62662,62664,62677,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ926213$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21848077$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesse, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, James M.</creatorcontrib><title>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</title><title>Language and speech</title><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><description>Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.</description><subject>Accentuation</subject><subject>Acoustic Stimulation</subject><subject>Audiometry, Speech</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Dutch language</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Lexicology</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Listening Comprehension</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Phonemes</subject><subject>Phonemics</subject><subject>Phonetics</subject><subject>Phonology</subject><subject>Recognition (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sentences</subject><subject>Sound duration</subject><subject>Speech</subject><subject>Speech Acoustics</subject><subject>Speech Communication</subject><subject>Speech Intelligibility</subject><subject>Speech Perception</subject><subject>Speech rate</subject><subject>Stimuli</subject><subject>Stress</subject><subject>Suprasegmentals</subject><subject>Syllables</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Time Perception</subject><subject>Vocabulary development</subject><subject>Voice recognition</subject><subject>Vowels</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>0023-8309</issn><issn>1756-6053</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstv1DAQxi0EokvhzgGBBQe4pPgZO8fVUl5aCURBHKNZZxxS8qqdSPS_r5ctpa0W5IMf8_tmPJ-GkMecHXFuzGvGhLSSFZzJwihb3CELbnSe5UzLu2SxDWfb-AF5EOMpS_dc2PvkQHCrLDNmQb6fjAg_m76mX2BCuvQe3RTp9APpZwwOx6kZejp4-mYO8PsMkQI9mccAEesO-wlausZfjYM2i1PAGOlqxofknoc24qPL_ZB8e3v8dfU-W39692G1XGdOWztlwDWKAmGjrPfpd05phlpVSngnTG42Iq8AQJuN8bICk-vKVgiKSYUarJOH5OUu7xiGsxnjVHZNdNi20OMwx9JapYQyXCXy1X_J5CGzhSy0TejzW-jpMIc-9VFaw6XWRbHN92wH1dBi2QZXwxxjuRTJfCuElIl4cY1oej9MAdy26k0q20PV2GOAdujRN-n5Bn-0h0-rwq5xewVsJ3BhiDGgL8fQdBDOU8vldozK22OUJE8vDZg3HVZXgj9zk4AnOwBD467Cxx-LNGD8Wk8Ravxr3j_rXQB94dNs</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Reinisch, Eva</creator><creator>Jesse, Alexandra</creator><creator>McQueen, James M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd. (UK)</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8BM</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</title><author>Reinisch, Eva ; Jesse, Alexandra ; McQueen, James M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Accentuation</topic><topic>Acoustic Stimulation</topic><topic>Audiometry, Speech</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Dutch language</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Lexicology</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Listening Comprehension</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Phonemes</topic><topic>Phonemics</topic><topic>Phonetics</topic><topic>Phonology</topic><topic>Recognition (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sentences</topic><topic>Sound duration</topic><topic>Speech</topic><topic>Speech Acoustics</topic><topic>Speech Communication</topic><topic>Speech Intelligibility</topic><topic>Speech Perception</topic><topic>Speech rate</topic><topic>Stimuli</topic><topic>Stress</topic><topic>Suprasegmentals</topic><topic>Syllables</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Time Perception</topic><topic>Vocabulary development</topic><topic>Voice recognition</topic><topic>Vowels</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reinisch, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesse, Alexandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, James M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reinisch, Eva</au><au>Jesse, Alexandra</au><au>McQueen, James M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ926213</ericid><atitle>Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue</atitle><jtitle>Language and speech</jtitle><addtitle>Lang Speech</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>147-165</pages><issn>0023-8309</issn><eissn>1756-6053</eissn><coden>LANSA4</coden><abstract>Three categorization experiments investigated whether the speaking rate of a preceding sentence influences durational cues to the perception of suprasegmental lexical-stress patterns. Dutch two-syllable word fragments had to be judged as coming from one of two longer words that matched the fragment segmentally but differed in lexical stress placement. Word pairs contrasted primary stress on either the first versus the second syllable or the first versus the third syllable. Duration of the initial or the second syllable of the fragments and rate of the preceding context (fast vs. slow) were manipulated. Listeners used speaking rate to decide about the degree of stress on initial syllables whether the syllables’ absolute durations were informative about stress (Experiment 1a) or not (Experiment 1b). Rate effects on the second syllable were visible only when the initial syllable was ambiguous in duration with respect to the preceding rate context (Experiment 2). Absolute second syllable durations contributed little to stress perception (Experiment 3). These results suggest that speaking rate is used to disambiguate words and that rate-modulated stress cues are more important on initial than non-initial syllables. Speaking rate affects perception of suprasegmental information.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>21848077</pmid><doi>10.1177/0023830910397489</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-8309 |
ispartof | Language and speech, 2011-06, Vol.54 (2), p.147-165 |
issn | 0023-8309 1756-6053 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_884424714 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Art, Design and Architecture Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sage Journals Online; Education Collection |
subjects | Accentuation Acoustic Stimulation Audiometry, Speech Behavior Context Cues Dutch language Evaluation Methods Experiments Foreign Countries Humans Investigations Language Arts Lexicology Linguistics Listening Comprehension Netherlands Perceptions Phonemes Phonemics Phonetics Phonology Recognition (Psychology) Sentences Sound duration Speech Speech Acoustics Speech Communication Speech Intelligibility Speech Perception Speech rate Stimuli Stress Suprasegmentals Syllables Time Factors Time Perception Vocabulary development Voice recognition Vowels Word Recognition |
title | Speaking Rate Affects the Perception of Duration as a Suprasegmental Lexical-stress Cue |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Speaking%20Rate%20Affects%20the%20Perception%20of%20Duration%20as%20a%20Suprasegmental%20Lexical-stress%20Cue&rft.jtitle=Language%20and%20speech&rft.au=Reinisch,%20Eva&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=147-165&rft.issn=0023-8309&rft.eissn=1756-6053&rft.coden=LANSA4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0023830910397489&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA260582233%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c588t-a15e29eab48ff026c450e54d42fc2767b26daaa57b7f3da765d8dea4034e5a8c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=871355994&rft_id=info:pmid/21848077&rft_galeid=A260582233&rft_ericid=EJ926213&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0023830910397489&rfr_iscdi=true |