Professional practice: A proposal for further strengthening science in environmental impact assessment in Canada

We observe ongoing weaknesses in the quality of science underpinning environmental impact assessment (EIA) in Canada. This is frustrating because approaches for strong scientific practice in EIA were published decades ago. A major failing has been the lack of scientific support from outside the EIA...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Impact assessment and project appraisal 2011-06, Vol.29 (2), p.159-165
Main Authors: Greig, Lorne A, Duinker, Peter N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Canada
Climate change
Environmental economics
Environmental impact
Environmental impact studies
Environmental management
Environmental policy
Forest management
Forest products industry
Forestry
Greenhouse effect
Organization theory
Organizational behaviour
Organizational structure
Pollution control
Science
Studies
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We observe ongoing weaknesses in the quality of science underpinning environmental impact assessment (EIA) in Canada. This is frustrating because approaches for strong scientific practice in EIA were published decades ago. A major failing has been the lack of scientific support from outside the EIA practitioner community. We argue for a re-conception of science associated with EIA that includes a rigorous scholarship of application inside EIA and a vigorous scholarship of integration outside it. Cases of exemplary organizational structures and science applications in the Canadian forest sector are given. To turn EIA from the often bitter battleground of shallow impact debates to an enterprise of strong accumulation of effects knowledge, we urge the relevant communities of researchers and practitioners to become embedded communities of practice and reform the way science contributes to EIA. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:1461-5517
1471-5465