Does gram-negative bacteraemia occur without endotoxaemia? A meta-analysis using hierarchical summary ROC curves

The limulus assay for endotoxin has been studied as a method for the rapid identification of gram-negative (GN) bacteraemia. The chromogenic (C-limulus) version is 100-fold more sensitive to an internal endotoxin standard than the earlier gelation version (G-limulus). The objective of this analysis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases 2010-02, Vol.29 (2), p.207-215
Main Author: Hurley, J. C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bacterial diseases
Bacterial sepsis
Biological and medical sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Endotoxemia - diagnosis
Endotoxins
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - complications
Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections - diagnosis
Human bacterial diseases
Humans
Infectious diseases
Internal Medicine
Limulus
Limulus Test
Medical Microbiology
Medical sciences
Statistics as Topic
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The limulus assay for endotoxin has been studied as a method for the rapid identification of gram-negative (GN) bacteraemia. The chromogenic (C-limulus) version is 100-fold more sensitive to an internal endotoxin standard than the earlier gelation version (G-limulus). The objective of this analysis is to compare the concordance between GN bacteraemia and endotoxaemia as determined in clinical studies using either version of the limulus assay. The summary results for the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity and specificity were derived using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) method of meta-analysis. Fifty-eight studies (25 G-limulus and 33 C-limulus) were included. Surprisingly, the mean DOR (4.9; 3-7.9 versus 10.7; 5.2-21.8) was inferior for studies using the C-limulus versus the original G-limulus version of the assay. Moreover, among studies limited to sepsis syndrome patients, the mean DOR remains poor at 4.2 (1.8-9.5). The proportion of GN bacteraemic patients for whom endotoxaemia is not detectable with either version of the limulus assay is >20% among the 58 studies overall, but >30% after the exclusion of studies with 20% among studies of patients with sepsis syndrome. These findings help to reconcile seemingly disparate study results.
ISSN:0934-9723
1435-4373
DOI:10.1007/s10096-009-0841-2