Loading…

Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework

This paper revisits Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environment...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biological conservation 2011-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1537-1544
Main Authors: Catlin, James, Jones, Roy, Jones, Tod
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3
container_end_page 1544
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1537
container_title Biological conservation
container_volume 144
creator Catlin, James
Jones, Roy
Jones, Tod
description This paper revisits Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888097809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320711000437</els_id><sourcerecordid>888097809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KHDEUgINU6FZ9A8G5kV7N9uRnZxIohbLaVhAEda9DNjlZsp2daDLj4p2v0dfrkzQy0kvhhJzAd37yEXJKYU6BNl-283WINvZzBpTOoQSjB2RGZctrpmj7gcwAoKk5g_Yj-ZTztjxb3ixm5OstPoUchtBvqovR-zFXpnfVBZrksP_78idX-9C5LnishjimkHeVT2aH-5h-H5NDb7qMJ2_3EVn9uLxf_qqvb35eLb9f11ZwOdSO8YapRgpuKTStN55zI0CKhTHceofoOCAY61S7QCUWfm1KZi2sFVW45kfk89T3IcXHEfOgdyFb7DrTYxyzllKCassppJhIm2LOCb1-SGFn0rOmoF9d6a2eXOlXVxpKMFrKzt8GmGxNVz7Y25D_1zLBlGwFL9zZxHkTtdkUG3p1VxoJACoFKFaIbxOBxcdTwKSzDdhbdCGhHbSL4f1V_gHSP4ty</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888097809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Catlin, James ; Jones, Roy ; Jones, Tod</creator><creatorcontrib>Catlin, James ; Jones, Roy ; Jones, Tod</creatorcontrib><description>This paper revisits Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Management framework ; managers ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Recreation ; researchers ; tourism ; wildlife ; wildlife management ; Wildlife tourism</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2011-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1537-1544</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24298743$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catlin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Tod</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>This paper revisits Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Management framework</subject><subject>managers</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>researchers</subject><subject>tourism</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><subject>Wildlife tourism</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KHDEUgINU6FZ9A8G5kV7N9uRnZxIohbLaVhAEda9DNjlZsp2daDLj4p2v0dfrkzQy0kvhhJzAd37yEXJKYU6BNl-283WINvZzBpTOoQSjB2RGZctrpmj7gcwAoKk5g_Yj-ZTztjxb3ixm5OstPoUchtBvqovR-zFXpnfVBZrksP_78idX-9C5LnishjimkHeVT2aH-5h-H5NDb7qMJ2_3EVn9uLxf_qqvb35eLb9f11ZwOdSO8YapRgpuKTStN55zI0CKhTHceofoOCAY61S7QCUWfm1KZi2sFVW45kfk89T3IcXHEfOgdyFb7DrTYxyzllKCassppJhIm2LOCb1-SGFn0rOmoF9d6a2eXOlXVxpKMFrKzt8GmGxNVz7Y25D_1zLBlGwFL9zZxHkTtdkUG3p1VxoJACoFKFaIbxOBxcdTwKSzDdhbdCGhHbSL4f1V_gHSP4ty</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Catlin, James</creator><creator>Jones, Roy</creator><creator>Jones, Tod</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</title><author>Catlin, James ; Jones, Roy ; Jones, Tod</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Management framework</topic><topic>managers</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>researchers</topic><topic>tourism</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><topic>Wildlife tourism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catlin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Tod</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catlin, James</au><au>Jones, Roy</au><au>Jones, Tod</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1537</spage><epage>1544</epage><pages>1537-1544</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>This paper revisits Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-3207
ispartof Biological conservation, 2011-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1537-1544
issn 0006-3207
1873-2917
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888097809
source Elsevier
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Management framework
managers
Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking
Recreation
researchers
tourism
wildlife
wildlife management
Wildlife tourism
title Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20Duffus%20and%20Dearden%E2%80%99s%20wildlife%20tourism%20framework&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Catlin,%20James&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1537&rft.epage=1544&rft.pages=1537-1544&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E888097809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888097809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true