Loading…
Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework
This paper revisits Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environment...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biological conservation 2011-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1537-1544 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3 |
container_end_page | 1544 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1537 |
container_title | Biological conservation |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | Catlin, James Jones, Roy Jones, Tod |
description | This paper revisits
Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in
Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888097809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320711000437</els_id><sourcerecordid>888097809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KHDEUgINU6FZ9A8G5kV7N9uRnZxIohbLaVhAEda9DNjlZsp2daDLj4p2v0dfrkzQy0kvhhJzAd37yEXJKYU6BNl-283WINvZzBpTOoQSjB2RGZctrpmj7gcwAoKk5g_Yj-ZTztjxb3ixm5OstPoUchtBvqovR-zFXpnfVBZrksP_78idX-9C5LnishjimkHeVT2aH-5h-H5NDb7qMJ2_3EVn9uLxf_qqvb35eLb9f11ZwOdSO8YapRgpuKTStN55zI0CKhTHceofoOCAY61S7QCUWfm1KZi2sFVW45kfk89T3IcXHEfOgdyFb7DrTYxyzllKCassppJhIm2LOCb1-SGFn0rOmoF9d6a2eXOlXVxpKMFrKzt8GmGxNVz7Y25D_1zLBlGwFL9zZxHkTtdkUG3p1VxoJACoFKFaIbxOBxcdTwKSzDdhbdCGhHbSL4f1V_gHSP4ty</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>888097809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Catlin, James ; Jones, Roy ; Jones, Tod</creator><creatorcontrib>Catlin, James ; Jones, Roy ; Jones, Tod</creatorcontrib><description>This paper revisits
Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in
Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BICOBK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Management framework ; managers ; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking ; Recreation ; researchers ; tourism ; wildlife ; wildlife management ; Wildlife tourism</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2011-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1537-1544</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24298743$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catlin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Tod</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>This paper revisits
Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in
Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Management framework</subject><subject>managers</subject><subject>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>researchers</subject><subject>tourism</subject><subject>wildlife</subject><subject>wildlife management</subject><subject>Wildlife tourism</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KHDEUgINU6FZ9A8G5kV7N9uRnZxIohbLaVhAEda9DNjlZsp2daDLj4p2v0dfrkzQy0kvhhJzAd37yEXJKYU6BNl-283WINvZzBpTOoQSjB2RGZctrpmj7gcwAoKk5g_Yj-ZTztjxb3ixm5OstPoUchtBvqovR-zFXpnfVBZrksP_78idX-9C5LnishjimkHeVT2aH-5h-H5NDb7qMJ2_3EVn9uLxf_qqvb35eLb9f11ZwOdSO8YapRgpuKTStN55zI0CKhTHceofoOCAY61S7QCUWfm1KZi2sFVW45kfk89T3IcXHEfOgdyFb7DrTYxyzllKCassppJhIm2LOCb1-SGFn0rOmoF9d6a2eXOlXVxpKMFrKzt8GmGxNVz7Y25D_1zLBlGwFL9zZxHkTtdkUG3p1VxoJACoFKFaIbxOBxcdTwKSzDdhbdCGhHbSL4f1V_gHSP4ty</recordid><startdate>20110501</startdate><enddate>20110501</enddate><creator>Catlin, James</creator><creator>Jones, Roy</creator><creator>Jones, Tod</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110501</creationdate><title>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</title><author>Catlin, James ; Jones, Roy ; Jones, Tod</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Management framework</topic><topic>managers</topic><topic>Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>researchers</topic><topic>tourism</topic><topic>wildlife</topic><topic>wildlife management</topic><topic>Wildlife tourism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catlin, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Tod</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catlin, James</au><au>Jones, Roy</au><au>Jones, Tod</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2011-05-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1537</spage><epage>1544</epage><pages>1537-1544</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><coden>BICOBK</coden><abstract>This paper revisits
Duffus and Dearden (1990) article ‘Non-Consumptive Wildlife-Oriented Recreation: a conceptual framework’ published in
Biological Conservation two decades ago. This model was developed as a tool to assist managers and researchers in achieving the best outcomes for both environmental conservation and the provision of wildlife tourism experiences. The body of literature examining wildlife tourism has grown significantly over the intervening period; however, this highly respected model has not been subject to critical review even though a number of recent empirical studies have successfully applied the concept. This has created an opportunity for reflection on its merits and potential. In particular, this paper discusses these findings to assess the contemporary value of this approach. It is contended that the framework still provides an appropriate means of predicting and managing change in a wildlife tourism system. Given the ability of the model to combine theoretical perspectives with practical outcomes and the now emerging body of literature based upon it, continued application and refinement of this model is more pertinent than ever.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
ispartof | Biological conservation, 2011-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1537-1544 |
issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888097809 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Management framework managers Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking Recreation researchers tourism wildlife wildlife management Wildlife tourism |
title | Revisiting Duffus and Dearden’s wildlife tourism framework |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T15%3A53%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20Duffus%20and%20Dearden%E2%80%99s%20wildlife%20tourism%20framework&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Catlin,%20James&rft.date=2011-05-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1537&rft.epage=1544&rft.pages=1537-1544&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft.coden=BICOBK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.01.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E888097809%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-d236296843c1067faf33a40845aa3cfdeed30e0acd975e945fba975cc0b919eb3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=888097809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |