The influence of uncertainty on conservation assessments: Australian frogs as a case study

• Published in: Biological conservation 2011-05, Vol.144 (5), p.1516-1525
• Main Authors: Gillespie, Graeme R., Scroggie, Michael P., Roberts, J. Dale, Cogger, Harold G., Mahony, Michael J., McDonald, Keith R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Amphibia. Reptilia; Amphibian declines; Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Assessments; Biological; Biological and medical sciences; case studies; Conservation; Conservation status; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; expert opinion; Extinction; Extinction risk; frogs; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Gaps; geographical distribution; international agreements; IUCN; natural resources conservation; Parks, reserves, wildlife conservation. Endangered species: population survey and restocking; planning; population distribution; population size; Ranking system; Regional; relative risk; Risk; Threatened species; Uncertainty; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
• ISSN: 0006-3207; 1873-2917
• DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.031

We evaluated the influence of uncertainty, based on variation in expert opinion, on assessment of conservation status of Australian amphibians. We examined relationships between different biological variables and inferred relative extinction risk, the influence of uncertainty on resulting ranks, and regional patterns of extinction risk and uncertainty. Our results were in general agreement with the International Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources but also reveal apparent high extinction risks among some taxa that the IUCN did not classify in any threatened category. These differences were exaggerated when the most conservative status assessments were taken from variation in expert opinion. Our assessments of relative extinction risk were strongly dependent on basic demographic variables, particularly population size, geographic distribution of populations and age at first reproduction. We identified regional hotspots of high relative extinction risk and poor knowledge of amphibians, leading to high uncertainty about the conservation status of species from those areas. Regional clustering of species with high relative extinction risk and high uncertainty may indicate higher levels of relative extinction risk than previously assessed. Our results highlight the influence of uncertainty on interpretation of conservation assessments of organism groups with large knowledge gaps. Uncertainty should be further incorporated into conservation planning as it not only highlights taxa with potentially underestimated extinction risk, but also facilitates identification of knowledge gaps informative of conservation status. Knowledge of regional patterns of extinction risk and uncertainty assists conservation planning through identification of regions of high extinction risk and/or large knowledge gaps.