Loading…
The impact of the BP baker report
This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety. Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was publishe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of safety research 2011-06, Vol.42 (3), p.215-222 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3 |
container_end_page | 222 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 215 |
container_title | Journal of safety research |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Rodríguez, Jennifer M. Payne, Stephanie C. Bergman, Mindy E. Beus, Jeremy M. |
description | This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety.
Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published.
Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective).
This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another.
This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one.
► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888105738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022437511000284</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440047171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xI9eKpNZM0H8WTLn7Bgh7Wc2jTKbZutzVpBf-9WXb14EG8zDDwvC_MQ8gJ0AQoyMsmabxLGAVIKE8oFTtkClplMbBU7ZIppYzFKVdiQg68byilUgDskwkDLYTM-JScLV4xqts-t0PUVdEQrpvnqMjf0EUO-84NR2Svypcej7f7kLzc3S5mD_H86f5xdj2PbQowxIplFWpmcx66s4LxkilBUcqCCdBhlKkqALkslOWKKSk15KBshVVZIlp-SC42vb3r3kf0g2lrb3G5zFfYjd5orYEKxfU_yFSnKuNZIM9_kU03ulV4I0BSZip4ChBsIOs67x1Wpnd1m7tPA9SsPZvGBM9m7dlQboLnkDndFo9Fi-VP4ltsAK42AAZlHzU6422NK4tl7dAOpuzqP-q_AIsFigs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>886697247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of the BP baker report</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rodríguez, Jennifer M. ; Payne, Stephanie C. ; Bergman, Mindy E. ; Beus, Jeremy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Jennifer M. ; Payne, Stephanie C. ; Bergman, Mindy E. ; Beus, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety.
Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published.
Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective).
This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another.
This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one.
► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21855693</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSFRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; BP Baker Panel Report ; Catastrophes ; Chemical process industry ; Contractors ; Contracts ; Data Collection ; Engineering ; Explosions ; Female ; Humans ; Industry ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occupational accidents ; Occupational safety ; Organizational Culture ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Petroleum ; Petroleum refineries ; Process safety culture ; Research Report ; Safety climate ; Safety Management ; Safety surveys ; Texas ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of safety research, 2011-06, Vol.42 (3), p.215-222</ispartof><rights>2011 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21855693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Mindy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beus, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of the BP baker report</title><title>Journal of safety research</title><addtitle>J Safety Res</addtitle><description>This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety.
Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published.
Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective).
This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another.
This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one.
► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>BP Baker Panel Report</subject><subject>Catastrophes</subject><subject>Chemical process industry</subject><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum refineries</subject><subject>Process safety culture</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Safety climate</subject><subject>Safety Management</subject><subject>Safety surveys</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0022-4375</issn><issn>1879-1247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xI9eKpNZM0H8WTLn7Bgh7Wc2jTKbZutzVpBf-9WXb14EG8zDDwvC_MQ8gJ0AQoyMsmabxLGAVIKE8oFTtkClplMbBU7ZIppYzFKVdiQg68byilUgDskwkDLYTM-JScLV4xqts-t0PUVdEQrpvnqMjf0EUO-84NR2Svypcej7f7kLzc3S5mD_H86f5xdj2PbQowxIplFWpmcx66s4LxkilBUcqCCdBhlKkqALkslOWKKSk15KBshVVZIlp-SC42vb3r3kf0g2lrb3G5zFfYjd5orYEKxfU_yFSnKuNZIM9_kU03ulV4I0BSZip4ChBsIOs67x1Wpnd1m7tPA9SsPZvGBM9m7dlQboLnkDndFo9Fi-VP4ltsAK42AAZlHzU6422NK4tl7dAOpuzqP-q_AIsFigs</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</creator><creator>Payne, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Bergman, Mindy E.</creator><creator>Beus, Jeremy M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>The impact of the BP baker report</title><author>Rodríguez, Jennifer M. ; Payne, Stephanie C. ; Bergman, Mindy E. ; Beus, Jeremy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>BP Baker Panel Report</topic><topic>Catastrophes</topic><topic>Chemical process industry</topic><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum refineries</topic><topic>Process safety culture</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Safety climate</topic><topic>Safety Management</topic><topic>Safety surveys</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Mindy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beus, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</au><au>Payne, Stephanie C.</au><au>Bergman, Mindy E.</au><au>Beus, Jeremy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of the BP baker report</atitle><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle><addtitle>J Safety Res</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>215-222</pages><issn>0022-4375</issn><eissn>1879-1247</eissn><coden>JSFRAV</coden><abstract>This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety.
Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published.
Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective).
This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another.
This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one.
► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21855693</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4375 |
ispartof | Journal of safety research, 2011-06, Vol.42 (3), p.215-222 |
issn | 0022-4375 1879-1247 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888105738 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult BP Baker Panel Report Catastrophes Chemical process industry Contractors Contracts Data Collection Engineering Explosions Female Humans Industry Male Middle Aged Occupational accidents Occupational safety Organizational Culture Perception Perceptions Petroleum Petroleum refineries Process safety culture Research Report Safety climate Safety Management Safety surveys Texas Urban areas |
title | The impact of the BP baker report |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20the%20BP%20baker%20report&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20safety%20research&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Jennifer%20M.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=215-222&rft.issn=0022-4375&rft.eissn=1879-1247&rft.coden=JSFRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440047171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=886697247&rft_id=info:pmid/21855693&rfr_iscdi=true |