Loading…

The impact of the BP baker report

This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety. Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was publishe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of safety research 2011-06, Vol.42 (3), p.215-222
Main Authors: Rodríguez, Jennifer M., Payne, Stephanie C., Bergman, Mindy E., Beus, Jeremy M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3
container_end_page 222
container_issue 3
container_start_page 215
container_title Journal of safety research
container_volume 42
creator Rodríguez, Jennifer M.
Payne, Stephanie C.
Bergman, Mindy E.
Beus, Jeremy M.
description This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety. Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published. Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective). This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another. This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one. ► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888105738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022437511000284</els_id><sourcerecordid>2440047171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xI9eKpNZM0H8WTLn7Bgh7Wc2jTKbZutzVpBf-9WXb14EG8zDDwvC_MQ8gJ0AQoyMsmabxLGAVIKE8oFTtkClplMbBU7ZIppYzFKVdiQg68byilUgDskwkDLYTM-JScLV4xqts-t0PUVdEQrpvnqMjf0EUO-84NR2Svypcej7f7kLzc3S5mD_H86f5xdj2PbQowxIplFWpmcx66s4LxkilBUcqCCdBhlKkqALkslOWKKSk15KBshVVZIlp-SC42vb3r3kf0g2lrb3G5zFfYjd5orYEKxfU_yFSnKuNZIM9_kU03ulV4I0BSZip4ChBsIOs67x1Wpnd1m7tPA9SsPZvGBM9m7dlQboLnkDndFo9Fi-VP4ltsAK42AAZlHzU6422NK4tl7dAOpuzqP-q_AIsFigs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>886697247</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of the BP baker report</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rodríguez, Jennifer M. ; Payne, Stephanie C. ; Bergman, Mindy E. ; Beus, Jeremy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Jennifer M. ; Payne, Stephanie C. ; Bergman, Mindy E. ; Beus, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety. Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published. Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective). This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another. This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one. ► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4375</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1247</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21855693</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JSFRAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; BP Baker Panel Report ; Catastrophes ; Chemical process industry ; Contractors ; Contracts ; Data Collection ; Engineering ; Explosions ; Female ; Humans ; Industry ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Occupational accidents ; Occupational safety ; Organizational Culture ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Petroleum ; Petroleum refineries ; Process safety culture ; Research Report ; Safety climate ; Safety Management ; Safety surveys ; Texas ; Urban areas</subject><ispartof>Journal of safety research, 2011-06, Vol.42 (3), p.215-222</ispartof><rights>2011 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Pergamon Press Inc. Jun 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21855693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Mindy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beus, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of the BP baker report</title><title>Journal of safety research</title><addtitle>J Safety Res</addtitle><description>This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety. Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published. Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective). This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another. This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one. ► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>BP Baker Panel Report</subject><subject>Catastrophes</subject><subject>Chemical process industry</subject><subject>Contractors</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Occupational accidents</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Organizational Culture</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Petroleum refineries</subject><subject>Process safety culture</subject><subject>Research Report</subject><subject>Safety climate</subject><subject>Safety Management</subject><subject>Safety surveys</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><issn>0022-4375</issn><issn>1879-1247</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMo7vrxA7xI9eKpNZM0H8WTLn7Bgh7Wc2jTKbZutzVpBf-9WXb14EG8zDDwvC_MQ8gJ0AQoyMsmabxLGAVIKE8oFTtkClplMbBU7ZIppYzFKVdiQg68byilUgDskwkDLYTM-JScLV4xqts-t0PUVdEQrpvnqMjf0EUO-84NR2Svypcej7f7kLzc3S5mD_H86f5xdj2PbQowxIplFWpmcx66s4LxkilBUcqCCdBhlKkqALkslOWKKSk15KBshVVZIlp-SC42vb3r3kf0g2lrb3G5zFfYjd5orYEKxfU_yFSnKuNZIM9_kU03ulV4I0BSZip4ChBsIOs67x1Wpnd1m7tPA9SsPZvGBM9m7dlQboLnkDndFo9Fi-VP4ltsAK42AAZlHzU6422NK4tl7dAOpuzqP-q_AIsFigs</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</creator><creator>Payne, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Bergman, Mindy E.</creator><creator>Beus, Jeremy M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>The impact of the BP baker report</title><author>Rodríguez, Jennifer M. ; Payne, Stephanie C. ; Bergman, Mindy E. ; Beus, Jeremy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>BP Baker Panel Report</topic><topic>Catastrophes</topic><topic>Chemical process industry</topic><topic>Contractors</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Occupational accidents</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Organizational Culture</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Petroleum refineries</topic><topic>Process safety culture</topic><topic>Research Report</topic><topic>Safety climate</topic><topic>Safety Management</topic><topic>Safety surveys</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergman, Mindy E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beus, Jeremy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez, Jennifer M.</au><au>Payne, Stephanie C.</au><au>Bergman, Mindy E.</au><au>Beus, Jeremy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of the BP baker report</atitle><jtitle>Journal of safety research</jtitle><addtitle>J Safety Res</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>215</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>215-222</pages><issn>0022-4375</issn><eissn>1879-1247</eissn><coden>JSFRAV</coden><abstract>This study examined the impact of the British Petroleum (BP) Baker Panel Report, reviewing the March 2005 BP-Texas City explosion, on the field of process safety. Three hundred eighty-four subscribers of a process safety listserv responded to a survey two years after the BP Baker Report was published. Results revealed respondents in the field of process safety are familiar with the BP Baker Report, feel it is important to the future safety of chemical processing, and believe that the findings are generalizable to other plants beyond BP-Texas City. Respondents indicated that few organizations have administered the publicly available BP Process Safety Culture Survey. Our results also showed that perceptions of contractors varied depending on whether respondents were part of processing organizations (internal perspective) or government or consulting agencies (external perspective). This research provides some insight into the beliefs of chemical processing personnel regarding the transportability and generalizability of lessons learned from one organization to another. This study has implications for both organizational scientists and engineers in that it reveals perceptions about the primary mechanism used to share lessons learned within one industry about one major catastrophe (i.e., investigation reports). This study provides preliminary information about the perceived impact of a report such as this one. ► Respondents that are chemical process safety personnel are familiar with the BP Baker Report. ► They feel it is important to future safety in the chemical processing industry. ► They believe that the findings in the Report are generalizable to other plants. ► Few organizations have administered the BP Process Safety Culture Survey. ► Perceptions of contractors vary by respondent roles (internal versus external).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21855693</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4375
ispartof Journal of safety research, 2011-06, Vol.42 (3), p.215-222
issn 0022-4375
1879-1247
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_888105738
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adult
BP Baker Panel Report
Catastrophes
Chemical process industry
Contractors
Contracts
Data Collection
Engineering
Explosions
Female
Humans
Industry
Male
Middle Aged
Occupational accidents
Occupational safety
Organizational Culture
Perception
Perceptions
Petroleum
Petroleum refineries
Process safety culture
Research Report
Safety climate
Safety Management
Safety surveys
Texas
Urban areas
title The impact of the BP baker report
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T17%3A06%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20the%20BP%20baker%20report&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20safety%20research&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez,%20Jennifer%20M.&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=215&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=215-222&rft.issn=0022-4375&rft.eissn=1879-1247&rft.coden=JSFRAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jsr.2011.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2440047171%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-729fe82ca31859b23d2750e66b2518b25d47b1e36b7c37276681a17cfefddeec3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=886697247&rft_id=info:pmid/21855693&rfr_iscdi=true