Chinese validation of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire

• Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 2011-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1305-1312
• Main Authors: Chan, Symphorosa Shing Chee, Cheung, Rachel Yau Kar, Yiu, Alice Ka Wah, Li, Jimmy Chak Man, Lai, Beatrice Pui Yee, Choy, Kwong Wai, Chung, Tony Kwok Hung
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; China; Female; Gynecology; Humans; Language; Manometry; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Middle Aged; Original Article; Pelvic Floor Disorders - diagnostic imaging; Pelvic Floor Disorders - physiopathology; Pelvic Floor Disorders - psychology; Quality of Life - psychology; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ultrasonography; Urodynamics; Urology
• ISSN: 0937-3462; 1433-3023
• DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1450-z

Introduction and hypothesis The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ). Methods Women who presented for pelvic floor disorders completed the Chinese version of PFDI and PFIQ, SF-36, a 3-day urinary and fecal diary. POP-Q assessment, urodynamic study, anal manometry, and ultrasound were performed where appropriate. Results Five hundred and ninety-seven women completed the study. The Cronbach’s alpha and test–retest reliability of PFDI and PFIQ was 0.92 and 0.98, and 0.77 and 0.79, respectively. Convergent validity was demonstrated with negative correlation of PFDI and PFIQ with SF-36; positive correlation of staging of prolapse, urinary or fecal incontinent episodes with the respective subscales of PFDI and PFIQ. Conclusions The Chinese version of PFDI and PFIQ are reliable and valid condition-specific health-related quality of life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders.