Loading…

Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation

Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Biomedical Optics 2010-03, Vol.15 (2), p.027003-027003
Main Authors: Nam, Jeong-Hun, Yang, Yijie, Chung, Seok, Shin, Sehyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53
container_end_page 027003
container_issue 2
container_start_page 027003
container_title Journal of Biomedical Optics
container_volume 15
creator Nam, Jeong-Hun
Yang, Yijie
Chung, Seok
Shin, Sehyun
description Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.
doi_str_mv 10.1117/1.3365951
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889398117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>889398117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT-P1DAQxS0E4u4WCr4Acococsz4T2yXsOI40ElLAXVkx042kMSL7S349njZ5Voaz4z909P4PUJeIdwionqHt5y30kh8Qq5RttAwpvFp7UHzhretviI3Of8AAN2a9jm5YiCkYUpdk2Ubl4NNU44rjQOdp3FfmpLsmpcp56ne2tXTxtn-Z-5tKSFN60iXUPbRZzqttOxDHW0-prCEtZxEUvDUzTF62od5pnYcUxhtqWIvyLPBzjm8vNQN-X738dv2vnnYffq8ff_Q9KKF0hgenJCovAHtglLMO2H9wIzg4KTy3lrXa8YH5INwXBgjewHKoXEDY73kG_LmrHtI8dcx5NLV35yWsWuIx9xpbbjR1br_kopziShq2ZC3Z7JPMecUhu6QpsWm3x1Cd4qhw-4SQ2VfX1SPbgn-kfznewXYGciHKTw-f_mw-3q3qzEBytMJDJgC4H975H8Auq2Q2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733511473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</title><source>SPIE Digital Library</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nam, Jeong-Hun ; Yang, Yijie ; Chung, Seok ; Shin, Sehyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Nam, Jeong-Hun ; Yang, Yijie ; Chung, Seok ; Shin, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><description>Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-3668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1560-2281</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1117/1.3365951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20459277</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBOPFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; Algorithms ; Backscattering ; Cells, Cultured ; Dextrans ; Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology ; Humans ; Light ; Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods ; Polarization ; Polarizers ; Red blood cells ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotational ; Scattering ; Scattering, Radiation ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2010-03, Vol.15 (2), p.027003-027003</ispartof><rights>2011 COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journalArticle/Download?urlId=10.1117/1.3365951$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3365951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,18965,27924,27925,55386,55387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nam, Jeong-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</title><title>Journal of Biomedical Optics</title><addtitle>J Biomed Opt</addtitle><description>Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Backscattering</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Dextrans</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Polarizers</subject><subject>Red blood cells</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotational</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1083-3668</issn><issn>1560-2281</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkT-P1DAQxS0E4u4WCr4Acococsz4T2yXsOI40ElLAXVkx042kMSL7S349njZ5Voaz4z909P4PUJeIdwionqHt5y30kh8Qq5RttAwpvFp7UHzhretviI3Of8AAN2a9jm5YiCkYUpdk2Ubl4NNU44rjQOdp3FfmpLsmpcp56ne2tXTxtn-Z-5tKSFN60iXUPbRZzqttOxDHW0-prCEtZxEUvDUzTF62od5pnYcUxhtqWIvyLPBzjm8vNQN-X738dv2vnnYffq8ff_Q9KKF0hgenJCovAHtglLMO2H9wIzg4KTy3lrXa8YH5INwXBgjewHKoXEDY73kG_LmrHtI8dcx5NLV35yWsWuIx9xpbbjR1br_kopziShq2ZC3Z7JPMecUhu6QpsWm3x1Cd4qhw-4SQ2VfX1SPbgn-kfznewXYGciHKTw-f_mw-3q3qzEBytMJDJgC4H975H8Auq2Q2A</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Nam, Jeong-Hun</creator><creator>Yang, Yijie</creator><creator>Chung, Seok</creator><creator>Shin, Sehyun</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</title><author>Nam, Jeong-Hun ; Yang, Yijie ; Chung, Seok ; Shin, Sehyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Backscattering</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Dextrans</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Polarizers</topic><topic>Red blood cells</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotational</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nam, Jeong-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nam, Jeong-Hun</au><au>Yang, Yijie</au><au>Chung, Seok</au><au>Shin, Sehyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Optics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Opt</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>027003</spage><epage>027003</epage><pages>027003-027003</pages><issn>1083-3668</issn><eissn>1560-2281</eissn><coden>JBOPFO</coden><abstract>Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20459277</pmid><doi>10.1117/1.3365951</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1083-3668
ispartof Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2010-03, Vol.15 (2), p.027003-027003
issn 1083-3668
1560-2281
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889398117
source SPIE Digital Library; PubMed Central
subjects Agglomeration
Algorithms
Backscattering
Cells, Cultured
Dextrans
Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology
Humans
Light
Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods
Polarization
Polarizers
Red blood cells
Reproducibility of Results
Rotational
Scattering
Scattering, Radiation
Sensitivity and Specificity
title Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20light-transmission%20and%20-backscattering%20methods%20in%20the%20measurement%20of%20red%20blood%20cell%20aggregation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Biomedical%20Optics&rft.au=Nam,%20Jeong-Hun&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=027003&rft.epage=027003&rft.pages=027003-027003&rft.issn=1083-3668&rft.eissn=1560-2281&rft.coden=JBOPFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1117/1.3365951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E889398117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733511473&rft_id=info:pmid/20459277&rfr_iscdi=true