Loading…
Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation
Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of Biomedical Optics 2010-03, Vol.15 (2), p.027003-027003 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53 |
container_end_page | 027003 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 027003 |
container_title | Journal of Biomedical Optics |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Nam, Jeong-Hun Yang, Yijie Chung, Seok Shin, Sehyun |
description | Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1117/1.3365951 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889398117</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>889398117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkT-P1DAQxS0E4u4WCr4Acococsz4T2yXsOI40ElLAXVkx042kMSL7S349njZ5Voaz4z909P4PUJeIdwionqHt5y30kh8Qq5RttAwpvFp7UHzhretviI3Of8AAN2a9jm5YiCkYUpdk2Ubl4NNU44rjQOdp3FfmpLsmpcp56ne2tXTxtn-Z-5tKSFN60iXUPbRZzqttOxDHW0-prCEtZxEUvDUzTF62od5pnYcUxhtqWIvyLPBzjm8vNQN-X738dv2vnnYffq8ff_Q9KKF0hgenJCovAHtglLMO2H9wIzg4KTy3lrXa8YH5INwXBgjewHKoXEDY73kG_LmrHtI8dcx5NLV35yWsWuIx9xpbbjR1br_kopziShq2ZC3Z7JPMecUhu6QpsWm3x1Cd4qhw-4SQ2VfX1SPbgn-kfznewXYGciHKTw-f_mw-3q3qzEBytMJDJgC4H975H8Auq2Q2A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733511473</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</title><source>SPIE Digital Library</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Nam, Jeong-Hun ; Yang, Yijie ; Chung, Seok ; Shin, Sehyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Nam, Jeong-Hun ; Yang, Yijie ; Chung, Seok ; Shin, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><description>Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1083-3668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1560-2281</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1117/1.3365951</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20459277</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBOPFO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; Algorithms ; Backscattering ; Cells, Cultured ; Dextrans ; Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology ; Humans ; Light ; Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods ; Polarization ; Polarizers ; Red blood cells ; Reproducibility of Results ; Rotational ; Scattering ; Scattering, Radiation ; Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><ispartof>Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2010-03, Vol.15 (2), p.027003-027003</ispartof><rights>2011 COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journalArticle/Download?urlId=10.1117/1.3365951$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1117/1.3365951$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspie$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,18965,27924,27925,55386,55387</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20459277$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nam, Jeong-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</title><title>Journal of Biomedical Optics</title><addtitle>J Biomed Opt</addtitle><description>Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Backscattering</subject><subject>Cells, Cultured</subject><subject>Dextrans</subject><subject>Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods</subject><subject>Polarization</subject><subject>Polarizers</subject><subject>Red blood cells</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Rotational</subject><subject>Scattering</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><issn>1083-3668</issn><issn>1560-2281</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkT-P1DAQxS0E4u4WCr4Acococsz4T2yXsOI40ElLAXVkx042kMSL7S349njZ5Voaz4z909P4PUJeIdwionqHt5y30kh8Qq5RttAwpvFp7UHzhretviI3Of8AAN2a9jm5YiCkYUpdk2Ubl4NNU44rjQOdp3FfmpLsmpcp56ne2tXTxtn-Z-5tKSFN60iXUPbRZzqttOxDHW0-prCEtZxEUvDUzTF62od5pnYcUxhtqWIvyLPBzjm8vNQN-X738dv2vnnYffq8ff_Q9KKF0hgenJCovAHtglLMO2H9wIzg4KTy3lrXa8YH5INwXBgjewHKoXEDY73kG_LmrHtI8dcx5NLV35yWsWuIx9xpbbjR1br_kopziShq2ZC3Z7JPMecUhu6QpsWm3x1Cd4qhw-4SQ2VfX1SPbgn-kfznewXYGciHKTw-f_mw-3q3qzEBytMJDJgC4H975H8Auq2Q2A</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Nam, Jeong-Hun</creator><creator>Yang, Yijie</creator><creator>Chung, Seok</creator><creator>Shin, Sehyun</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</title><author>Nam, Jeong-Hun ; Yang, Yijie ; Chung, Seok ; Shin, Sehyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Backscattering</topic><topic>Cells, Cultured</topic><topic>Dextrans</topic><topic>Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods</topic><topic>Polarization</topic><topic>Polarizers</topic><topic>Red blood cells</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Rotational</topic><topic>Scattering</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nam, Jeong-Hun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yijie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chung, Seok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, Sehyun</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nam, Jeong-Hun</au><au>Yang, Yijie</au><au>Chung, Seok</au><au>Shin, Sehyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Biomedical Optics</jtitle><addtitle>J Biomed Opt</addtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>027003</spage><epage>027003</epage><pages>027003-027003</pages><issn>1083-3668</issn><eissn>1560-2281</eissn><coden>JBOPFO</coden><abstract>Light-transmission and light-backscattering methods are commonly used to determine red-blood-cell (RBC) aggregation. Even though the results reveal good correlations between the parameters that are measured by these two methods, the methods themselves yield quite different values. The objective of this research is to investigate and delineate the characteristics of the two optical methods. We measured RBC aggregation by using a newly developed microchip-based aggregometer. An orthogonal polarization technique, wherein multiple scattering causes polarized light to be depolarized and passed through an orthogonal polarizer, was applied to the backscattering method. Our results were also compared to those of conventional aggregometers [laser-assisted optical rotational cell analyzer (LORCA)], and revealed that the backscattering method yielded higher aggregation indices than the transmission method and LORCA. However, the backscattering method with orthogonal polarization yielded the same values of aggregation indices as the transmission method. These agreements between the two methods were also found in measurements of RBC aggregability in various concentrations of dextran solutions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>20459277</pmid><doi>10.1117/1.3365951</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1083-3668 |
ispartof | Journal of Biomedical Optics, 2010-03, Vol.15 (2), p.027003-027003 |
issn | 1083-3668 1560-2281 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_889398117 |
source | SPIE Digital Library; PubMed Central |
subjects | Agglomeration Algorithms Backscattering Cells, Cultured Dextrans Erythrocyte Aggregation - physiology Humans Light Nephelometry and Turbidimetry - methods Polarization Polarizers Red blood cells Reproducibility of Results Rotational Scattering Scattering, Radiation Sensitivity and Specificity |
title | Comparison of light-transmission and -backscattering methods in the measurement of red blood cell aggregation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T02%3A24%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20light-transmission%20and%20-backscattering%20methods%20in%20the%20measurement%20of%20red%20blood%20cell%20aggregation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Biomedical%20Optics&rft.au=Nam,%20Jeong-Hun&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=027003&rft.epage=027003&rft.pages=027003-027003&rft.issn=1083-3668&rft.eissn=1560-2281&rft.coden=JBOPFO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1117/1.3365951&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E889398117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-93eb4517d908be772db4adf29430b57ddaabc823f13f4b34995c407b19bf22c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733511473&rft_id=info:pmid/20459277&rfr_iscdi=true |