Performance of Whipple shields at impact velocities above 9 km/s

• Published in: International journal of impact engineering 2011-06, Vol.38 (6), p.495-503
• Main Authors: Piekutowski, A.J., Poormon, K.L., Christiansen, E.L., Davis, B.A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aluminum base alloys; Aluminum spheres; Ballistic limit curves; Bumpers; Critical particle diameter; Exact sciences and technology; Fracture mechanics (crack, fatigue, damage...); Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications); Impact velocity; Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...); Mathematical analysis; Multilayer insulation; Physics; Rear wall damage; Shields; Solid mechanics; Space stations; Structural and continuum mechanics; Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...); Walls; Whipple shield
• ISSN: 0734-743X; 1879-3509
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2010.10.021

The results of 18 impact tests performed on Whipple shields were compared to the predicted ballistic limits of the shields in the region where the impact velocity of the threatening particle was high enough to produce melting and incipient vaporization of the particle. Ballistic limit equations developed at NASA Johnson Space Center were used to determine nominal failure thresholds for two configurations of all-aluminum Whipple shields. In the tests, 2017-T4 aluminum spheres with diameters ranging from 1.40 to 6.35 mm were used to impact the shields at impact velocities ranging from 6.94 to 9.89 km/s. Two different aluminum alloys were used for the rear walls of a simple Whipple shield. The results of 13 tests using these simple Whipple shields showed they offered better-than-predicted capability as impact velocity increased and that the strength of the rear wall material appeared to have a smaller-than-predicted effect on the shield performance. The results of five tests using three configurations of a scaled Space Station shield – a plain shield at 0 degrees, two shields with multilayer insulation in the space between the bumper and the rear wall (also at 0 degrees), and two tests with the plain shield at 45 degrees obliquity – showed that these shields met their predicted capabilities.