Loading…

Feature-based attention promotes biological motion recognition

Motion perception is important for visually segregating and identifying objects from their surroundings, but in some cases extracting motion cues can be taxing to the human attention system. We measured the strength of feature salience required for individuals to correctly judge three types of movin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2011-09, Vol.11 (10), p.11-11
Main Authors: Tyler, Sarah C, Grossman, Emily D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-2b8a94d43a2482444fffe3a00db9a45006658a3a3d39d2cf1d7b9f2efcc2ec903
cites
container_end_page 11
container_issue 10
container_start_page 11
container_title Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 11
creator Tyler, Sarah C
Grossman, Emily D
description Motion perception is important for visually segregating and identifying objects from their surroundings, but in some cases extracting motion cues can be taxing to the human attention system. We measured the strength of feature salience required for individuals to correctly judge three types of moving events: biological motion, coherent motion, and multiple object tracking. The motion animations were embedded within a larger Gabor grid and constructed such that motion was conveyed by a salient single-feature dimension (second order) or by alternating across equisalient feature dimensions (third order). In the single-feature displays, we found biological motion to require less difference in the Gabor features (relative to background) to yield equivalent task performance as the coherent motion or multiple object tracking. This main effect of feature magnitude may reflect the inherent salience of biological motion as a visual stimulus. In the alternating-feature displays, both the biological motion and coherent motion discriminations needed additional salience, as compared to the single-feature displays, to achieve threshold discrimination levels. Accuracy in the multiple object tracking task did not vary as a function of salience. Together, these findings demonstrate the effectiveness with which attention-based motion mechanisms operate in complex dynamic sequences and argue for a critical role of feature-based attention in promoting biological motion perception.
doi_str_mv 10.1167/11.10.11
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_892947089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>892947089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-2b8a94d43a2482444fffe3a00db9a45006658a3a3d39d2cf1d7b9f2efcc2ec903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMorq6Cv0B600vXfLVNLoIsrgoLXvRcpslkqbTNmqQH_71ddxUvMw8zD8PwEnLF6IKxsrpjbPGDR-SMFULmlSj58T-ekfMYPyjltKDslMw407xkSpyR-xVCGgPmDUS0GaSEQ2r9kG2D733CmDWt7_ymNdBl02C3Cmj8Zmh3fEFOHHQRLw99Tt5Xj2_L53z9-vSyfFjnRiiect4o0NJKAVwqLqV0zqEASm2jQRaUlmWhQICwQltuHLNVox1HZwxHo6mYk5v93emtzxFjqvs2Guw6GNCPsVaaa1lRpSfzdm-a4GMM6OptaHsIXzWj9S6sqexxUq8PR8emR_sn_qYjvgFxeWRJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>892947089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feature-based attention promotes biological motion recognition</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Tyler, Sarah C ; Grossman, Emily D</creator><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Sarah C ; Grossman, Emily D</creatorcontrib><description>Motion perception is important for visually segregating and identifying objects from their surroundings, but in some cases extracting motion cues can be taxing to the human attention system. We measured the strength of feature salience required for individuals to correctly judge three types of moving events: biological motion, coherent motion, and multiple object tracking. The motion animations were embedded within a larger Gabor grid and constructed such that motion was conveyed by a salient single-feature dimension (second order) or by alternating across equisalient feature dimensions (third order). In the single-feature displays, we found biological motion to require less difference in the Gabor features (relative to background) to yield equivalent task performance as the coherent motion or multiple object tracking. This main effect of feature magnitude may reflect the inherent salience of biological motion as a visual stimulus. In the alternating-feature displays, both the biological motion and coherent motion discriminations needed additional salience, as compared to the single-feature displays, to achieve threshold discrimination levels. Accuracy in the multiple object tracking task did not vary as a function of salience. Together, these findings demonstrate the effectiveness with which attention-based motion mechanisms operate in complex dynamic sequences and argue for a critical role of feature-based attention in promoting biological motion perception.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1534-7362</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1167/11.10.11</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21926183</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Attention - physiology ; Cues ; Humans ; Male ; Motion Perception - physiology ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2011-09, Vol.11 (10), p.11-11</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-2b8a94d43a2482444fffe3a00db9a45006658a3a3d39d2cf1d7b9f2efcc2ec903</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21926183$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Emily D</creatorcontrib><title>Feature-based attention promotes biological motion recognition</title><title>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><description>Motion perception is important for visually segregating and identifying objects from their surroundings, but in some cases extracting motion cues can be taxing to the human attention system. We measured the strength of feature salience required for individuals to correctly judge three types of moving events: biological motion, coherent motion, and multiple object tracking. The motion animations were embedded within a larger Gabor grid and constructed such that motion was conveyed by a salient single-feature dimension (second order) or by alternating across equisalient feature dimensions (third order). In the single-feature displays, we found biological motion to require less difference in the Gabor features (relative to background) to yield equivalent task performance as the coherent motion or multiple object tracking. This main effect of feature magnitude may reflect the inherent salience of biological motion as a visual stimulus. In the alternating-feature displays, both the biological motion and coherent motion discriminations needed additional salience, as compared to the single-feature displays, to achieve threshold discrimination levels. Accuracy in the multiple object tracking task did not vary as a function of salience. Together, these findings demonstrate the effectiveness with which attention-based motion mechanisms operate in complex dynamic sequences and argue for a critical role of feature-based attention in promoting biological motion perception.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Motion Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1534-7362</issn><issn>1534-7362</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1LxDAQhoMorq6Cv0B600vXfLVNLoIsrgoLXvRcpslkqbTNmqQH_71ddxUvMw8zD8PwEnLF6IKxsrpjbPGDR-SMFULmlSj58T-ekfMYPyjltKDslMw407xkSpyR-xVCGgPmDUS0GaSEQ2r9kG2D733CmDWt7_ymNdBl02C3Cmj8Zmh3fEFOHHQRLw99Tt5Xj2_L53z9-vSyfFjnRiiect4o0NJKAVwqLqV0zqEASm2jQRaUlmWhQICwQltuHLNVox1HZwxHo6mYk5v93emtzxFjqvs2Guw6GNCPsVaaa1lRpSfzdm-a4GMM6OptaHsIXzWj9S6sqexxUq8PR8emR_sn_qYjvgFxeWRJ</recordid><startdate>20110901</startdate><enddate>20110901</enddate><creator>Tyler, Sarah C</creator><creator>Grossman, Emily D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110901</creationdate><title>Feature-based attention promotes biological motion recognition</title><author>Tyler, Sarah C ; Grossman, Emily D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-2b8a94d43a2482444fffe3a00db9a45006658a3a3d39d2cf1d7b9f2efcc2ec903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Motion Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tyler, Sarah C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grossman, Emily D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tyler, Sarah C</au><au>Grossman, Emily D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feature-based attention promotes biological motion recognition</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vis</addtitle><date>2011-09-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>11</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>11-11</pages><issn>1534-7362</issn><eissn>1534-7362</eissn><abstract>Motion perception is important for visually segregating and identifying objects from their surroundings, but in some cases extracting motion cues can be taxing to the human attention system. We measured the strength of feature salience required for individuals to correctly judge three types of moving events: biological motion, coherent motion, and multiple object tracking. The motion animations were embedded within a larger Gabor grid and constructed such that motion was conveyed by a salient single-feature dimension (second order) or by alternating across equisalient feature dimensions (third order). In the single-feature displays, we found biological motion to require less difference in the Gabor features (relative to background) to yield equivalent task performance as the coherent motion or multiple object tracking. This main effect of feature magnitude may reflect the inherent salience of biological motion as a visual stimulus. In the alternating-feature displays, both the biological motion and coherent motion discriminations needed additional salience, as compared to the single-feature displays, to achieve threshold discrimination levels. Accuracy in the multiple object tracking task did not vary as a function of salience. Together, these findings demonstrate the effectiveness with which attention-based motion mechanisms operate in complex dynamic sequences and argue for a critical role of feature-based attention in promoting biological motion perception.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>21926183</pmid><doi>10.1167/11.10.11</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-7362
ispartof Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 2011-09, Vol.11 (10), p.11-11
issn 1534-7362
1534-7362
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_892947089
source Open Access: PubMed Central; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Attention - physiology
Cues
Humans
Male
Motion Perception - physiology
Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology
Photic Stimulation - methods
Young Adult
title Feature-based attention promotes biological motion recognition
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T08%3A47%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feature-based%20attention%20promotes%20biological%20motion%20recognition&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vision%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Tyler,%20Sarah%20C&rft.date=2011-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=11&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=11-11&rft.issn=1534-7362&rft.eissn=1534-7362&rft_id=info:doi/10.1167/11.10.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E892947089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-2b8a94d43a2482444fffe3a00db9a45006658a3a3d39d2cf1d7b9f2efcc2ec903%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=892947089&rft_id=info:pmid/21926183&rfr_iscdi=true