Scrotal insulation and its relationship to abnormal morphology, chromatin protamination and nuclear shape of spermatozoa in Holstein-Friesian and Belgian Blue bulls

• Published in: Theriogenology 2011-10, Vol.76 (7), p.1246-1257
• Main Authors: Rahman, Mohammad Bozlur, Vandaele, Leen, Rijsselaere, Tom, Maes, Dominiek, Hoogewijs, Maarten, Frijters, Adrie, Noordman, Jakomien, Granados, Ana, Dernelle, Eric, Shamsuddin, Mohammed, Parrish, John J, Van Soom, Ann
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Belgian Blue; Body Temperature; bulls; Cattle; Cell Nucleus Shape; chromatin; Chromatin - metabolism; Chromatin remodeling; developmental stages; epididymis; fluorescence microscopy; Fourier harmonic amplitude; heat stress; heat treatment; Holstein; insulating materials; Male; meiosis; Nuclear shape; Protamination; Scrotal insulation; Scrotum - physiology; semen; Semen Analysis - veterinary; sperm motility; Spermatogenesis; spermatozoa; Spermatozoa - cytology; Spermatozoa - physiology; Spermatozoa - ultrastructure; spermiogenesis; Stress, Physiological; temperature; vacuoles; viability
• ISSN: 0093-691X; 1879-3231
• DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.05.031

The objectives of this study were to identify the stages of spermatogenesis susceptible to elevated testicular temperature in terms of sperm motility, viability, morphology, chromatin protamination and nuclear shape. The latter two valuable parameters are not included in routine semen analysis. Scrotal insulation (SI) was applied for 48 h in 2 Holstein-Friesian (HF) and 2 Belgian Blue (BB) bulls and semen was collected at 7 d intervals along with semen collection of a non-insulated bull of each breed. Semen samples were frozen and assigned to 4 groups: period 1 (preinsulation) = −7 d and 0 d, where 0 d = initiation of SI after semen collection; period 2 = 7 d (sperm presumed in the epididymis during SI); period 3 = 14 d to 42 d (cells presumed at spermiogenesis and meiosis stages during SI); period 4 = 49 d to 63 d (cells presumed at spermatocytogenesis stage during SI). The percentages of progressively motile and viable spermatozoa as assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis (CASA) and fluorescence microscopy, respectively were decreased whereas abnormal sperm heads, nuclear vacuoles and tail defects were increased at period 3 (P < 0.05) compared to period 1, 2 or 4 in SI bulls of both HF and BB breeds. Protamine deficient spermatozoa as observed by chromomycin A₃ (CMA₃) staining were more present (P < 0.05) at period 2 and 3 in both breeds compared to period 1 or 4. Sperm nuclear shape as determined by Fourier harmonic amplitude (FHA) was most affected by heat stress during period 3 (P < 0.01) and a higher response was observed in BB bulls than HF bulls. In conclusion, sperm cells at the spermiogenic and meiotic stages of development are more susceptible to heat stress. The lack of chromatin protamination is the most pertinent result of heat stress, together with subtle changes in sperm head shape, which can be detected by FHA but not by conventional semen analysis.