Loading…

Dopant Segregation Analysis on Sb:SnO2 Nanocrystals

The development of reliable nanostructured devices is intrinsically dependent on the description and manipulation of materials’ properties at the atomic scale. Consequently, several technological advances are dependent on improvements in the characterization techniques and in the models used to desc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Chemistry : a European journal 2011-10, Vol.17 (41), p.11515-11519
Main Authors: Stroppa, Daniel G., Montoro, Luciano A., Beltrán, Armando, Conti, Tiago G., da Silva, Rafael O., Andrés, Juan, Leite, Edson R., Ramirez, Antonio J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 11519
container_issue 41
container_start_page 11515
container_title Chemistry : a European journal
container_volume 17
creator Stroppa, Daniel G.
Montoro, Luciano A.
Beltrán, Armando
Conti, Tiago G.
da Silva, Rafael O.
Andrés, Juan
Leite, Edson R.
Ramirez, Antonio J.
description The development of reliable nanostructured devices is intrinsically dependent on the description and manipulation of materials’ properties at the atomic scale. Consequently, several technological advances are dependent on improvements in the characterization techniques and in the models used to describe the properties of nanosized materials as a function of the synthesis parameters. The evaluation of doping element distributions in nanocrystals is directly linked to fundamental aspects that define the properties of the material, such as surface‐energy distribution, nanoparticle shape, and crystal growth mechanism. However, this is still one of the most challenging tasks in the characterization of materials because of the required spatial resolution and other various restrictions from quantitative characterization techniques, such as sample degradation and signal‐to‐noise ratio. This paper addresses the dopant segregation characterization for two antimony‐doped tin oxide (Sb:SnO2) systems, with different Sb doping levels, by the combined use of experimental and simulated high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images and surface‐energy ab initio calculations. The applied methodology provided three‐dimensional models with geometrical and compositional information that were demonstrated to be self‐consistent and correspond to the systems’ mean properties. The results evidence that the dopant distribution configuration is dependent on the system composition and that dopant atom redistribution may be an active mechanism for the overall surface‐energy minimization. Crystal clear: The dopant segregation analysis for Sb:SnO2 with different compositions is presented by using an approach that combines HRTEM characterization and surface‐energy ab initio calculations (see figure). The results indicate that the segregation of the dopant atoms is dependent on the overall composition. A discussion based on the total energy minimization of the system is presented to clarify this finding.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/chem.201100972
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894812394</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3957789071</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i3262-6b78127e0b7ecf50190bf36ed746bfacd2fd72ef29679b7458c384184d0fe7613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EoqVw5YgiceCU4i12zK0qXZBKCy0IbpaTOCUlS4kTQf49rlpy4DTb92Y0D4BLBPsIQnwbfuisjyGyheD4CHSRh5FLOPOOQRcKyl3mEdEBZ8ZsoGUYIaegg5GwXSy6gNwXW5VXzkqvS71WVVLkziBXaWMS49h8Fdyt8gV25iovwrIxlUrNOTiJbdAXh9gDr-PRy3DqzhaTh-Fg5iYEM-yygPsIcw0DrsPYg0jAICZMR5yyIFZhhOOIYx1jwbgIOPX8kPgU-TSCseYMkR642e_dlsVXrU0ls8SEOk1VrovaSF9Qe4AIasnrf-SmqEv7hpGIM8aQt_u8B64OVB1kOpLbMslU2cg_Nywg9sB3kuqmnSMod17Lndey9VoOp6PHtrJad69NTKV_Wq0qPyXjhHvybT6RdAyX46fls3wnv8aXfyw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1766615096</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dopant Segregation Analysis on Sb:SnO2 Nanocrystals</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Stroppa, Daniel G. ; Montoro, Luciano A. ; Beltrán, Armando ; Conti, Tiago G. ; da Silva, Rafael O. ; Andrés, Juan ; Leite, Edson R. ; Ramirez, Antonio J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stroppa, Daniel G. ; Montoro, Luciano A. ; Beltrán, Armando ; Conti, Tiago G. ; da Silva, Rafael O. ; Andrés, Juan ; Leite, Edson R. ; Ramirez, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><description>The development of reliable nanostructured devices is intrinsically dependent on the description and manipulation of materials’ properties at the atomic scale. Consequently, several technological advances are dependent on improvements in the characterization techniques and in the models used to describe the properties of nanosized materials as a function of the synthesis parameters. The evaluation of doping element distributions in nanocrystals is directly linked to fundamental aspects that define the properties of the material, such as surface‐energy distribution, nanoparticle shape, and crystal growth mechanism. However, this is still one of the most challenging tasks in the characterization of materials because of the required spatial resolution and other various restrictions from quantitative characterization techniques, such as sample degradation and signal‐to‐noise ratio. This paper addresses the dopant segregation characterization for two antimony‐doped tin oxide (Sb:SnO2) systems, with different Sb doping levels, by the combined use of experimental and simulated high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images and surface‐energy ab initio calculations. The applied methodology provided three‐dimensional models with geometrical and compositional information that were demonstrated to be self‐consistent and correspond to the systems’ mean properties. The results evidence that the dopant distribution configuration is dependent on the system composition and that dopant atom redistribution may be an active mechanism for the overall surface‐energy minimization. Crystal clear: The dopant segregation analysis for Sb:SnO2 with different compositions is presented by using an approach that combines HRTEM characterization and surface‐energy ab initio calculations (see figure). The results indicate that the segregation of the dopant atoms is dependent on the overall composition. A discussion based on the total energy minimization of the system is presented to clarify this finding.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0947-6539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-3765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/chem.201100972</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21953929</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEUJED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Weinheim: WILEY-VCH Verlag</publisher><subject>antimony ; Chemistry ; doping ; Electrons ; molecular modeling ; Nanocrystals ; nanostructures ; surface chemistry ; tin</subject><ispartof>Chemistry : a European journal, 2011-10, Vol.17 (41), p.11515-11519</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21953929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stroppa, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoro, Luciano A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrán, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Tiago G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Rafael O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrés, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Edson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><title>Dopant Segregation Analysis on Sb:SnO2 Nanocrystals</title><title>Chemistry : a European journal</title><addtitle>Chem. Eur. J</addtitle><description>The development of reliable nanostructured devices is intrinsically dependent on the description and manipulation of materials’ properties at the atomic scale. Consequently, several technological advances are dependent on improvements in the characterization techniques and in the models used to describe the properties of nanosized materials as a function of the synthesis parameters. The evaluation of doping element distributions in nanocrystals is directly linked to fundamental aspects that define the properties of the material, such as surface‐energy distribution, nanoparticle shape, and crystal growth mechanism. However, this is still one of the most challenging tasks in the characterization of materials because of the required spatial resolution and other various restrictions from quantitative characterization techniques, such as sample degradation and signal‐to‐noise ratio. This paper addresses the dopant segregation characterization for two antimony‐doped tin oxide (Sb:SnO2) systems, with different Sb doping levels, by the combined use of experimental and simulated high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images and surface‐energy ab initio calculations. The applied methodology provided three‐dimensional models with geometrical and compositional information that were demonstrated to be self‐consistent and correspond to the systems’ mean properties. The results evidence that the dopant distribution configuration is dependent on the system composition and that dopant atom redistribution may be an active mechanism for the overall surface‐energy minimization. Crystal clear: The dopant segregation analysis for Sb:SnO2 with different compositions is presented by using an approach that combines HRTEM characterization and surface‐energy ab initio calculations (see figure). The results indicate that the segregation of the dopant atoms is dependent on the overall composition. A discussion based on the total energy minimization of the system is presented to clarify this finding.</description><subject>antimony</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>doping</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>molecular modeling</subject><subject>Nanocrystals</subject><subject>nanostructures</subject><subject>surface chemistry</subject><subject>tin</subject><issn>0947-6539</issn><issn>1521-3765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkElPwzAQhS0EoqVw5YgiceCU4i12zK0qXZBKCy0IbpaTOCUlS4kTQf49rlpy4DTb92Y0D4BLBPsIQnwbfuisjyGyheD4CHSRh5FLOPOOQRcKyl3mEdEBZ8ZsoGUYIaegg5GwXSy6gNwXW5VXzkqvS71WVVLkziBXaWMS49h8Fdyt8gV25iovwrIxlUrNOTiJbdAXh9gDr-PRy3DqzhaTh-Fg5iYEM-yygPsIcw0DrsPYg0jAICZMR5yyIFZhhOOIYx1jwbgIOPX8kPgU-TSCseYMkR642e_dlsVXrU0ls8SEOk1VrovaSF9Qe4AIasnrf-SmqEv7hpGIM8aQt_u8B64OVB1kOpLbMslU2cg_Nywg9sB3kuqmnSMod17Lndey9VoOp6PHtrJad69NTKV_Wq0qPyXjhHvybT6RdAyX46fls3wnv8aXfyw</recordid><startdate>20111004</startdate><enddate>20111004</enddate><creator>Stroppa, Daniel G.</creator><creator>Montoro, Luciano A.</creator><creator>Beltrán, Armando</creator><creator>Conti, Tiago G.</creator><creator>da Silva, Rafael O.</creator><creator>Andrés, Juan</creator><creator>Leite, Edson R.</creator><creator>Ramirez, Antonio J.</creator><general>WILEY-VCH Verlag</general><general>WILEY‐VCH Verlag</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111004</creationdate><title>Dopant Segregation Analysis on Sb:SnO2 Nanocrystals</title><author>Stroppa, Daniel G. ; Montoro, Luciano A. ; Beltrán, Armando ; Conti, Tiago G. ; da Silva, Rafael O. ; Andrés, Juan ; Leite, Edson R. ; Ramirez, Antonio J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3262-6b78127e0b7ecf50190bf36ed746bfacd2fd72ef29679b7458c384184d0fe7613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>antimony</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>doping</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>molecular modeling</topic><topic>Nanocrystals</topic><topic>nanostructures</topic><topic>surface chemistry</topic><topic>tin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stroppa, Daniel G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montoro, Luciano A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beltrán, Armando</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Tiago G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Rafael O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrés, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Edson R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramirez, Antonio J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stroppa, Daniel G.</au><au>Montoro, Luciano A.</au><au>Beltrán, Armando</au><au>Conti, Tiago G.</au><au>da Silva, Rafael O.</au><au>Andrés, Juan</au><au>Leite, Edson R.</au><au>Ramirez, Antonio J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dopant Segregation Analysis on Sb:SnO2 Nanocrystals</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle><addtitle>Chem. Eur. J</addtitle><date>2011-10-04</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>41</issue><spage>11515</spage><epage>11519</epage><pages>11515-11519</pages><issn>0947-6539</issn><eissn>1521-3765</eissn><coden>CEUJED</coden><abstract>The development of reliable nanostructured devices is intrinsically dependent on the description and manipulation of materials’ properties at the atomic scale. Consequently, several technological advances are dependent on improvements in the characterization techniques and in the models used to describe the properties of nanosized materials as a function of the synthesis parameters. The evaluation of doping element distributions in nanocrystals is directly linked to fundamental aspects that define the properties of the material, such as surface‐energy distribution, nanoparticle shape, and crystal growth mechanism. However, this is still one of the most challenging tasks in the characterization of materials because of the required spatial resolution and other various restrictions from quantitative characterization techniques, such as sample degradation and signal‐to‐noise ratio. This paper addresses the dopant segregation characterization for two antimony‐doped tin oxide (Sb:SnO2) systems, with different Sb doping levels, by the combined use of experimental and simulated high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images and surface‐energy ab initio calculations. The applied methodology provided three‐dimensional models with geometrical and compositional information that were demonstrated to be self‐consistent and correspond to the systems’ mean properties. The results evidence that the dopant distribution configuration is dependent on the system composition and that dopant atom redistribution may be an active mechanism for the overall surface‐energy minimization. Crystal clear: The dopant segregation analysis for Sb:SnO2 with different compositions is presented by using an approach that combines HRTEM characterization and surface‐energy ab initio calculations (see figure). The results indicate that the segregation of the dopant atoms is dependent on the overall composition. A discussion based on the total energy minimization of the system is presented to clarify this finding.</abstract><cop>Weinheim</cop><pub>WILEY-VCH Verlag</pub><pmid>21953929</pmid><doi>10.1002/chem.201100972</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0947-6539
ispartof Chemistry : a European journal, 2011-10, Vol.17 (41), p.11515-11519
issn 0947-6539
1521-3765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_894812394
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects antimony
Chemistry
doping
Electrons
molecular modeling
Nanocrystals
nanostructures
surface chemistry
tin
title Dopant Segregation Analysis on Sb:SnO2 Nanocrystals
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A55%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dopant%20Segregation%20Analysis%20on%20Sb:SnO2%20Nanocrystals&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20:%20a%20European%20journal&rft.au=Stroppa,%20Daniel%20G.&rft.date=2011-10-04&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=41&rft.spage=11515&rft.epage=11519&rft.pages=11515-11519&rft.issn=0947-6539&rft.eissn=1521-3765&rft.coden=CEUJED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/chem.201100972&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3957789071%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i3262-6b78127e0b7ecf50190bf36ed746bfacd2fd72ef29679b7458c384184d0fe7613%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1766615096&rft_id=info:pmid/21953929&rfr_iscdi=true