Loading…

Influenza Vaccine Delivery Delays from the Perspective of Primary Care Physicians

Background The effects of delayed influenza vaccine delivery on primary practices are currently unknown. Purpose To describe, among primary care physicians nationally regarding the 2006–2007 influenza season: (1) how physicians defined influenza vaccine delay; (2) the extent of reported vaccine dela...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:American journal of preventive medicine 2011-06, Vol.40 (6), p.620-624
Main Authors: O'Leary, Sean T., MD, Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH, McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH, Daley, Matthew F., MD, Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH, Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH, Babbel, Christine I., MSPH, Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD, Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-986efbaaaefc27c4ded6bf0d136e60c42481a67654ca57a0ffcee75dda1d6913
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-986efbaaaefc27c4ded6bf0d136e60c42481a67654ca57a0ffcee75dda1d6913
container_end_page 624
container_issue 6
container_start_page 620
container_title American journal of preventive medicine
container_volume 40
creator O'Leary, Sean T., MD
Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH
McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH
Daley, Matthew F., MD
Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH
Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH
Babbel, Christine I., MSPH
Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD
Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH
description Background The effects of delayed influenza vaccine delivery on primary practices are currently unknown. Purpose To describe, among primary care physicians nationally regarding the 2006–2007 influenza season: (1) how physicians defined influenza vaccine delay; (2) the extent of reported vaccine delays; and (3) the perceived effects of vaccine delays. Methods Between March and June 2007, a total of 1268 primary care physicians nationally were surveyed. Results Survey response was 74% ( n =940). The majority of physicians (79%) defined “influenza vaccine delay” as not receiving vaccine by November 1. Fifty-three percent reported a vaccine delay. Providers reported the following as effects of delays: reduced satisfaction of patients or parents in the practice (72%); decreased percentage in their practice who received the vaccination (65%); disruption of scheduling influenza clinics (55%); increased referral of patients elsewhere for vaccination (55%); and negative financial impact caused by unused vaccine (46%). Those who reported experiencing delays more often reported not meeting demand for vaccine (adjusted risk ratio [ARR]=1.83, 95% CI=1.64, 2.07); that grocery stores, retail outlets, or pharmacies had vaccine before their practices did (ARR=1.82, 95% CI=1.53, 2.26); not receiving all vaccine that was ordered (ARR=1.19, 95% CI=1.06, 1.36); and having leftover vaccine (ARR=1.17, 95% CI=1.04, 1.32). Conclusions During the 2006–2007 influenza season, a non-shortage season, the majority of respondents reported experiencing an influenza vaccine delivery delay. Experiencing a delay was thought to decrease vaccination use, increase referrals elsewhere, and have a negative financial impact on practices. Delayed delivery of influenza vaccine is disruptive for primary care practices, and it consequently may affect vaccination coverage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896182689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0749379711001383</els_id><sourcerecordid>874182480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-986efbaaaefc27c4ded6bf0d136e60c42481a67654ca57a0ffcee75dda1d6913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk1rGzEQhkVpSdw0_6CEvfW0rka7lrSXQHCSNhBoSkOvYiyNiNz9cCRvwP311bJpD70YDUgwj2aG9x3GPgJfAgf5ebvEjnaRloIDLLnIAW_YArSqSiG5essWXNVNWalGnbL3KW0550pDc8JOBaxkPtWCfb_rfTtS_xuLn2ht6Km4pja8UDxMDzykwsehK_ZPVDxQTDuy-5wtBl88xNBhxtYYc-7pkIIN2KcP7J3HNtH5633GHm9vHtdfy_tvX-7WV_elrTXfl42W5DeISN4KZWtHTm48d1BJktzWotaAUslVbXGlkHtvidTKOQQnG6jO2Ke57C4OzyOlvelCstS22NMwJqMbCVpI3RwnVZ3JPNRxUmbNhICpZj2TNg4pRfJmN6thgJvJHrM1sz1mssdwkWMa-uK1wbjpyP379NePDFzOAGXlXgJFk2yg3pILMStv3BCOdfi_gG1DHyy2v-hAaTuMsc-uGDApfzA_phWZNgSAc6h0Vf0BxT23-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>866532219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influenza Vaccine Delivery Delays from the Perspective of Primary Care Physicians</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>O'Leary, Sean T., MD ; Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH ; McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH ; Daley, Matthew F., MD ; Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH ; Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH ; Babbel, Christine I., MSPH ; Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD ; Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T., MD ; Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH ; McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH ; Daley, Matthew F., MD ; Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH ; Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH ; Babbel, Christine I., MSPH ; Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD ; Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><description>Background The effects of delayed influenza vaccine delivery on primary practices are currently unknown. Purpose To describe, among primary care physicians nationally regarding the 2006–2007 influenza season: (1) how physicians defined influenza vaccine delay; (2) the extent of reported vaccine delays; and (3) the perceived effects of vaccine delays. Methods Between March and June 2007, a total of 1268 primary care physicians nationally were surveyed. Results Survey response was 74% ( n =940). The majority of physicians (79%) defined “influenza vaccine delay” as not receiving vaccine by November 1. Fifty-three percent reported a vaccine delay. Providers reported the following as effects of delays: reduced satisfaction of patients or parents in the practice (72%); decreased percentage in their practice who received the vaccination (65%); disruption of scheduling influenza clinics (55%); increased referral of patients elsewhere for vaccination (55%); and negative financial impact caused by unused vaccine (46%). Those who reported experiencing delays more often reported not meeting demand for vaccine (adjusted risk ratio [ARR]=1.83, 95% CI=1.64, 2.07); that grocery stores, retail outlets, or pharmacies had vaccine before their practices did (ARR=1.82, 95% CI=1.53, 2.26); not receiving all vaccine that was ordered (ARR=1.19, 95% CI=1.06, 1.36); and having leftover vaccine (ARR=1.17, 95% CI=1.04, 1.32). Conclusions During the 2006–2007 influenza season, a non-shortage season, the majority of respondents reported experiencing an influenza vaccine delivery delay. Experiencing a delay was thought to decrease vaccination use, increase referrals elsewhere, and have a negative financial impact on practices. Delayed delivery of influenza vaccine is disruptive for primary care practices, and it consequently may affect vaccination coverage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0749-3797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21565653</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJPMEA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Doctors ; Female ; Health Care Surveys ; Humans ; Immunization ; Immunization Programs - methods ; Influenza ; Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; Influenza Vaccines - supply &amp; distribution ; Influenza, Human - epidemiology ; Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control ; Internal Medicine ; Male ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - methods ; Referrals ; Time Factors ; United States ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>American journal of preventive medicine, 2011-06, Vol.40 (6), p.620-624</ispartof><rights>American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><rights>2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-986efbaaaefc27c4ded6bf0d136e60c42481a67654ca57a0ffcee75dda1d6913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-986efbaaaefc27c4ded6bf0d136e60c42481a67654ca57a0ffcee75dda1d6913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30979</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21565653$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Matthew F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babbel, Christine I., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><title>Influenza Vaccine Delivery Delays from the Perspective of Primary Care Physicians</title><title>American journal of preventive medicine</title><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><description>Background The effects of delayed influenza vaccine delivery on primary practices are currently unknown. Purpose To describe, among primary care physicians nationally regarding the 2006–2007 influenza season: (1) how physicians defined influenza vaccine delay; (2) the extent of reported vaccine delays; and (3) the perceived effects of vaccine delays. Methods Between March and June 2007, a total of 1268 primary care physicians nationally were surveyed. Results Survey response was 74% ( n =940). The majority of physicians (79%) defined “influenza vaccine delay” as not receiving vaccine by November 1. Fifty-three percent reported a vaccine delay. Providers reported the following as effects of delays: reduced satisfaction of patients or parents in the practice (72%); decreased percentage in their practice who received the vaccination (65%); disruption of scheduling influenza clinics (55%); increased referral of patients elsewhere for vaccination (55%); and negative financial impact caused by unused vaccine (46%). Those who reported experiencing delays more often reported not meeting demand for vaccine (adjusted risk ratio [ARR]=1.83, 95% CI=1.64, 2.07); that grocery stores, retail outlets, or pharmacies had vaccine before their practices did (ARR=1.82, 95% CI=1.53, 2.26); not receiving all vaccine that was ordered (ARR=1.19, 95% CI=1.06, 1.36); and having leftover vaccine (ARR=1.17, 95% CI=1.04, 1.32). Conclusions During the 2006–2007 influenza season, a non-shortage season, the majority of respondents reported experiencing an influenza vaccine delivery delay. Experiencing a delay was thought to decrease vaccination use, increase referrals elsewhere, and have a negative financial impact on practices. Delayed delivery of influenza vaccine is disruptive for primary care practices, and it consequently may affect vaccination coverage.</description><subject>Doctors</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Surveys</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunization Programs - methods</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Influenza Vaccines - supply &amp; distribution</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</subject><subject>Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Referrals</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0749-3797</issn><issn>1873-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkk1rGzEQhkVpSdw0_6CEvfW0rka7lrSXQHCSNhBoSkOvYiyNiNz9cCRvwP311bJpD70YDUgwj2aG9x3GPgJfAgf5ebvEjnaRloIDLLnIAW_YArSqSiG5essWXNVNWalGnbL3KW0550pDc8JOBaxkPtWCfb_rfTtS_xuLn2ht6Km4pja8UDxMDzykwsehK_ZPVDxQTDuy-5wtBl88xNBhxtYYc-7pkIIN2KcP7J3HNtH5633GHm9vHtdfy_tvX-7WV_elrTXfl42W5DeISN4KZWtHTm48d1BJktzWotaAUslVbXGlkHtvidTKOQQnG6jO2Ke57C4OzyOlvelCstS22NMwJqMbCVpI3RwnVZ3JPNRxUmbNhICpZj2TNg4pRfJmN6thgJvJHrM1sz1mssdwkWMa-uK1wbjpyP379NePDFzOAGXlXgJFk2yg3pILMStv3BCOdfi_gG1DHyy2v-hAaTuMsc-uGDApfzA_phWZNgSAc6h0Vf0BxT23-g</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>O'Leary, Sean T., MD</creator><creator>Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH</creator><creator>McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH</creator><creator>Daley, Matthew F., MD</creator><creator>Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH</creator><creator>Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH</creator><creator>Babbel, Christine I., MSPH</creator><creator>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</creator><creator>Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Influenza Vaccine Delivery Delays from the Perspective of Primary Care Physicians</title><author>O'Leary, Sean T., MD ; Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH ; McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH ; Daley, Matthew F., MD ; Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH ; Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH ; Babbel, Christine I., MSPH ; Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD ; Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-986efbaaaefc27c4ded6bf0d136e60c42481a67654ca57a0ffcee75dda1d6913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Doctors</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Surveys</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunization Programs - methods</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Influenza Vaccines - supply &amp; distribution</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - epidemiology</topic><topic>Influenza, Human - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Referrals</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Sean T., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daley, Matthew F., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babbel, Christine I., MSPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Leary, Sean T., MD</au><au>Barrow, Jennifer C., MSPH</au><au>McQuillan, Lon, MD, MSPH</au><au>Daley, Matthew F., MD</au><au>Crane, Lori A., PhD, MPH</au><au>Beaty, Brenda L., MSPH</au><au>Babbel, Christine I., MSPH</au><au>Dickinson, L. Miriam, PhD</au><au>Kempe, Allison, MD, MPH</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influenza Vaccine Delivery Delays from the Perspective of Primary Care Physicians</atitle><jtitle>American journal of preventive medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Prev Med</addtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>620</spage><epage>624</epage><pages>620-624</pages><issn>0749-3797</issn><eissn>1873-2607</eissn><coden>AJPMEA</coden><abstract>Background The effects of delayed influenza vaccine delivery on primary practices are currently unknown. Purpose To describe, among primary care physicians nationally regarding the 2006–2007 influenza season: (1) how physicians defined influenza vaccine delay; (2) the extent of reported vaccine delays; and (3) the perceived effects of vaccine delays. Methods Between March and June 2007, a total of 1268 primary care physicians nationally were surveyed. Results Survey response was 74% ( n =940). The majority of physicians (79%) defined “influenza vaccine delay” as not receiving vaccine by November 1. Fifty-three percent reported a vaccine delay. Providers reported the following as effects of delays: reduced satisfaction of patients or parents in the practice (72%); decreased percentage in their practice who received the vaccination (65%); disruption of scheduling influenza clinics (55%); increased referral of patients elsewhere for vaccination (55%); and negative financial impact caused by unused vaccine (46%). Those who reported experiencing delays more often reported not meeting demand for vaccine (adjusted risk ratio [ARR]=1.83, 95% CI=1.64, 2.07); that grocery stores, retail outlets, or pharmacies had vaccine before their practices did (ARR=1.82, 95% CI=1.53, 2.26); not receiving all vaccine that was ordered (ARR=1.19, 95% CI=1.06, 1.36); and having leftover vaccine (ARR=1.17, 95% CI=1.04, 1.32). Conclusions During the 2006–2007 influenza season, a non-shortage season, the majority of respondents reported experiencing an influenza vaccine delivery delay. Experiencing a delay was thought to decrease vaccination use, increase referrals elsewhere, and have a negative financial impact on practices. Delayed delivery of influenza vaccine is disruptive for primary care practices, and it consequently may affect vaccination coverage.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>21565653</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.021</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0749-3797
ispartof American journal of preventive medicine, 2011-06, Vol.40 (6), p.620-624
issn 0749-3797
1873-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896182689
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Doctors
Female
Health Care Surveys
Humans
Immunization
Immunization Programs - methods
Influenza
Influenza Vaccines - administration & dosage
Influenza Vaccines - supply & distribution
Influenza, Human - epidemiology
Influenza, Human - prevention & control
Internal Medicine
Male
Primary health care
Primary Health Care - methods
Referrals
Time Factors
United States
Vaccines
title Influenza Vaccine Delivery Delays from the Perspective of Primary Care Physicians
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A52%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influenza%20Vaccine%20Delivery%20Delays%20from%20the%20Perspective%20of%20Primary%20Care%20Physicians&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20preventive%20medicine&rft.au=O'Leary,%20Sean%20T.,%20MD&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=620&rft.epage=624&rft.pages=620-624&rft.issn=0749-3797&rft.eissn=1873-2607&rft.coden=AJPMEA&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E874182480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-986efbaaaefc27c4ded6bf0d136e60c42481a67654ca57a0ffcee75dda1d6913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=866532219&rft_id=info:pmid/21565653&rfr_iscdi=true