Loading…
Epworth sleepiness scale in obstructive sleep disordered breathing: the reliability and validity of the Thai version
Purposes The objectives of this study are to test the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and to assess the relationship between the ESS score and the severity of obstructive sleep disordered breathing. Methods A total of 228 subjects (149 males and 79...
Saved in:
Published in: | Sleep & breathing 2011-09, Vol.15 (3), p.571-577 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purposes
The objectives of this study are to test the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and to assess the relationship between the ESS score and the severity of obstructive sleep disordered breathing.
Methods
A total of 228 subjects (149 males and 79 females) were recruited. In order to check the discriminant validity of the ESS, we included 32 healthy volunteers and 39 patients with primary snoring to be the control groups and 126 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) confirmed by full polysomnography to be the disease groups. The test–retest reliability was investigated in 71 subjects. To check the responsiveness properties of the questionnaire, we asked a separate group of 31 patients who were successfully treated with either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or upper airway surgery to complete the ESS before and after treatment at 3–6 months.
Results
The internal consistency demonstrated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for standardized item was 0.87 and a range from 0.84 to 0.86 if some items were deleted. The test–retest reliability was shown by intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.79. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean of the ESS scores of the control groups (6.1 ± 3.0) and the OSA patients (9.9 ± 5.3) (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1520-9512 1522-1709 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11325-010-0405-9 |