Loading…

Epworth sleepiness scale in obstructive sleep disordered breathing: the reliability and validity of the Thai version

Purposes The objectives of this study are to test the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and to assess the relationship between the ESS score and the severity of obstructive sleep disordered breathing. Methods A total of 228 subjects (149 males and 79...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sleep & breathing 2011-09, Vol.15 (3), p.571-577
Main Authors: Banhiran, Wish, Assanasen, Paraya, Nopmaneejumruslers, Cherdchai, Metheetrairut, Choakchai
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purposes The objectives of this study are to test the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) and to assess the relationship between the ESS score and the severity of obstructive sleep disordered breathing. Methods A total of 228 subjects (149 males and 79 females) were recruited. In order to check the discriminant validity of the ESS, we included 32 healthy volunteers and 39 patients with primary snoring to be the control groups and 126 patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) confirmed by full polysomnography to be the disease groups. The test–retest reliability was investigated in 71 subjects. To check the responsiveness properties of the questionnaire, we asked a separate group of 31 patients who were successfully treated with either continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or upper airway surgery to complete the ESS before and after treatment at 3–6 months. Results The internal consistency demonstrated by Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for standardized item was 0.87 and a range from 0.84 to 0.86 if some items were deleted. The test–retest reliability was shown by intra-class correlation coefficients of 0.79. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean of the ESS scores of the control groups (6.1 ± 3.0) and the OSA patients (9.9 ± 5.3) ( p  
ISSN:1520-9512
1522-1709
DOI:10.1007/s11325-010-0405-9