Compliance with processes of care in intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand - a point prevalence study

• Published in: Anaesthesia and intensive care 2011-09, Vol.39 (5), p.926-935
• Main Authors: HEWSON-CONROY, K. M, BURRELL, A. R, ELLIOTT, D, WEBB, S. A. R, SEPPELT, I. M, TAYLOR, C, GLASS, P
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aged; Anesthesia; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy; Australia; Biological and medical sciences; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Guideline Adherence - statistics & numerical data; Health aspects; Health Care Surveys - methods; Health Care Surveys - statistics & numerical data; Hospital patients; Humans; Intensive care units; Intensive Care Units - standards; Intensive Care Units - statistics & numerical data; Male; Management; Medical care; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Process Assessment (Health Care) - methods; Process Assessment (Health Care) - statistics & numerical data; Quality Indicators, Health Care - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 0310-057X; 1448-0271
• DOI: 10.1177/0310057X1103900520

There are indications that compliance with routine clinical practices in intensive care units (ICU) varies widely internationally, but it is currently unknown whether this is the case throughout Australia and New Zealand. A one-day point prevalence study measured the prevalence of routine care processes being delivered in Australian and New Zealand ICUs including the assessment and/or management of: nutrition, pain, sedation, weaning from mechanical ventilation, head of bed elevation, deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, stress ulcer prophylaxis, blood glucose, pressure areas and bowel action. Using a sample of 50 adult ICUs, prevalence data were collected for 662 patients with a median age of 65 years and a median Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score of 18. Wide variations in compliance were evident in several care components including: assessment of nutritional goals (74%, interquartile range [IQR] 51 to 89%), pain score (35%, IQR 17 to 62%), sedation score (89%, IQR 50 to 100%); care of ventilated patients e.g. head of bed elevation > 30 degrees (33%, IQR 7 to 62%) and setting weaning plans (50%, IQR 28 to 78%); pressure area risk assessment (78%, IQR 18 to 100%) and constipation management plan (43%, IQR 6 to 87%). Care components that were delivered more consistently included nutrition delivery (100%, IQR 100 to 100%), deep venous thrombosis (96%, IQR 89 to 100%) and stress ulcer (90%, IQR 78 to 100%) prophylaxis, and checking blood sugar levels (93%, IQR 88 to 100%). This point prevalence study demonstrated variability in the delivery of 'routine' cares in Australian and New Zealand ICUs. This may be driven in part by lack of consensus on what is best practice in intensive care units, prompting the need for further research in this area.