Loading…
Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars
Soares CJ, Roscoe MG, Castro CG, Santana FR, Raposo LHA, Quagliatto PS, Novais VR. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars. International Endodontic Journal,44, 1047–1054, 2011. Aim To investigate ex vivo the influence of gamma ir...
Saved in:
Published in: | International endodontic journal 2011-11, Vol.44 (11), p.1047-1054 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-60770b011fe409faf0934cc4c318d78a13b701f62891543ef50169302f1ed7783 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 1054 |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1047 |
container_title | International endodontic journal |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Soares, C. J. Roscoe, M. G. Castro, C. G. Santana, F. R. Raposo, L. H. A. Quagliatto, P. S. Novais, V. R. |
description | Soares CJ, Roscoe MG, Castro CG, Santana FR, Raposo LHA, Quagliatto PS, Novais VR. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars. International Endodontic Journal,44, 1047–1054, 2011.
Aim To investigate ex vivo the influence of gamma irradiation therapy and restorative material on fracture resistance, fracture mode and strain of root filled human premolars.
Methodology Sixty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) determined by two study factors: (i) restorative materials: sound teeth, root filled teeth restored with composite resin, root filled teeth restored with amalgam; (ii) gamma irradiation: irradiated (subjected to 60 Gy of gamma irradiation in daily increments of 2 Gy) and nonirradiated. For the strain gauge test, two strain gauges per sample were attached on the buccal and palatal cusp surfaces (n = 5). Strain values were recorded during loading of 0–150 N. Fracture resistance (N) was assessed in a mechanical testing machine (n = 10). Strain gauge for each cusp and fracture resistance data were analysed by two‐way anova (3 × 2) followed by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05). The failure mode was evaluated using an optical stereomicroscope and classified according to the location of the failure.
Results Gamma radiation therapy significantly reduced the fracture resistance of intact teeth. The strain was higher for teeth restored with amalgam than for those restored with composite resin. The teeth restored with composite resin had similar strain values to sound teeth. Nonirradiated teeth had more restorable failures than irradiated teeth.
Conclusions Gamma irradiation significantly reduced fracture resistance and increased cusp strain. The use of composite resin resulted in better biomechanical behaviour than amalgam for restoring root filled teeth whether or not they were submitted to radiotherapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01920.x |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896827530</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>896827530</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-60770b011fe409faf0934cc4c318d78a13b701f62891543ef50169302f1ed7783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UU1v1DAQtRCILoW_gHzjlHT8FScHDqjaLq2qcqBVj5aTjFkvznpxsmX77-uwZefiGb_3Rpr3CKEMSpbrYlMyUamCq4aVHBgrgTUcysMbsjgBb8kCmBQFr2t1Rj6M4wYAFAj2npxxpiVIqRYkLJ3DbqLR0V92GCz1Kdne28nHLbXbniYcp5jy_IR0sBMmbwPN2LRG2vo4YLe2W9_lzxbX9snHfZqXpRgn6nwI2NNdwiEGm8aP5J2zYcRPr-85ebha3l9-L25_rK4vv90WnQQNRQVaQ5vPciihcdZBI2TXyU6wute1ZaLVwFzF64YpKdApYFUjgDuGvda1OCdfjnt3Kf7Z5wPM4McOQ7BbjPvR1E1Vc60EZObnV-a-HbA3u-QHm57Nf4My4euR8NcHfD7hDMwchNmY2W8z-23mIMy_IMzBXC9v5i7ri6PejxMeTnqbfptKC63M493KqBW_r2_ufholXgDoo4qr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>896827530</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Soares, C. J. ; Roscoe, M. G. ; Castro, C. G. ; Santana, F. R. ; Raposo, L. H. A. ; Quagliatto, P. S. ; Novais, V. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Soares, C. J. ; Roscoe, M. G. ; Castro, C. G. ; Santana, F. R. ; Raposo, L. H. A. ; Quagliatto, P. S. ; Novais, V. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Soares CJ, Roscoe MG, Castro CG, Santana FR, Raposo LHA, Quagliatto PS, Novais VR. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars. International Endodontic Journal,44, 1047–1054, 2011.
Aim To investigate ex vivo the influence of gamma irradiation therapy and restorative material on fracture resistance, fracture mode and strain of root filled human premolars.
Methodology Sixty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) determined by two study factors: (i) restorative materials: sound teeth, root filled teeth restored with composite resin, root filled teeth restored with amalgam; (ii) gamma irradiation: irradiated (subjected to 60 Gy of gamma irradiation in daily increments of 2 Gy) and nonirradiated. For the strain gauge test, two strain gauges per sample were attached on the buccal and palatal cusp surfaces (n = 5). Strain values were recorded during loading of 0–150 N. Fracture resistance (N) was assessed in a mechanical testing machine (n = 10). Strain gauge for each cusp and fracture resistance data were analysed by two‐way anova (3 × 2) followed by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05). The failure mode was evaluated using an optical stereomicroscope and classified according to the location of the failure.
Results Gamma radiation therapy significantly reduced the fracture resistance of intact teeth. The strain was higher for teeth restored with amalgam than for those restored with composite resin. The teeth restored with composite resin had similar strain values to sound teeth. Nonirradiated teeth had more restorable failures than irradiated teeth.
Conclusions Gamma irradiation significantly reduced fracture resistance and increased cusp strain. The use of composite resin resulted in better biomechanical behaviour than amalgam for restoring root filled teeth whether or not they were submitted to radiotherapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-2885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01920.x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21740445</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis of Variance ; Bicuspid - pathology ; Bicuspid - radiation effects ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Case-Control Studies ; Composite Resins - radiation effects ; Dental Amalgam - radiation effects ; Dental Materials - radiation effects ; Dental Restoration Failure ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dental Stress Analysis ; Dentistry ; failure mode ; fracture strength ; Gamma Rays - adverse effects ; Humans ; Maxilla ; radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy - adverse effects ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Reference Values ; Root Canal Therapy ; root filled teeth ; Statistics, Nonparametric ; strain gauge method ; Tooth Fractures - etiology ; Tooth Fractures - pathology ; Tooth, Nonvital - complications</subject><ispartof>International endodontic journal, 2011-11, Vol.44 (11), p.1047-1054</ispartof><rights>2011 International Endodontic Journal</rights><rights>2011 International Endodontic Journal.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-60770b011fe409faf0934cc4c318d78a13b701f62891543ef50169302f1ed7783</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21740445$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soares, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, F. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raposo, L. H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quagliatto, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novais, V. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars</title><title>International endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><description>Soares CJ, Roscoe MG, Castro CG, Santana FR, Raposo LHA, Quagliatto PS, Novais VR. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars. International Endodontic Journal,44, 1047–1054, 2011.
Aim To investigate ex vivo the influence of gamma irradiation therapy and restorative material on fracture resistance, fracture mode and strain of root filled human premolars.
Methodology Sixty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) determined by two study factors: (i) restorative materials: sound teeth, root filled teeth restored with composite resin, root filled teeth restored with amalgam; (ii) gamma irradiation: irradiated (subjected to 60 Gy of gamma irradiation in daily increments of 2 Gy) and nonirradiated. For the strain gauge test, two strain gauges per sample were attached on the buccal and palatal cusp surfaces (n = 5). Strain values were recorded during loading of 0–150 N. Fracture resistance (N) was assessed in a mechanical testing machine (n = 10). Strain gauge for each cusp and fracture resistance data were analysed by two‐way anova (3 × 2) followed by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05). The failure mode was evaluated using an optical stereomicroscope and classified according to the location of the failure.
Results Gamma radiation therapy significantly reduced the fracture resistance of intact teeth. The strain was higher for teeth restored with amalgam than for those restored with composite resin. The teeth restored with composite resin had similar strain values to sound teeth. Nonirradiated teeth had more restorable failures than irradiated teeth.
Conclusions Gamma irradiation significantly reduced fracture resistance and increased cusp strain. The use of composite resin resulted in better biomechanical behaviour than amalgam for restoring root filled teeth whether or not they were submitted to radiotherapy.</description><subject>Analysis of Variance</subject><subject>Bicuspid - pathology</subject><subject>Bicuspid - radiation effects</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Composite Resins - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dental Amalgam - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dental Materials - radiation effects</subject><subject>Dental Restoration Failure</subject><subject>Dental Restoration, Permanent</subject><subject>Dental Stress Analysis</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>failure mode</subject><subject>fracture strength</subject><subject>Gamma Rays - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maxilla</subject><subject>radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Root Canal Therapy</subject><subject>root filled teeth</subject><subject>Statistics, Nonparametric</subject><subject>strain gauge method</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - etiology</subject><subject>Tooth Fractures - pathology</subject><subject>Tooth, Nonvital - complications</subject><issn>0143-2885</issn><issn>1365-2591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9UU1v1DAQtRCILoW_gHzjlHT8FScHDqjaLq2qcqBVj5aTjFkvznpxsmX77-uwZefiGb_3Rpr3CKEMSpbrYlMyUamCq4aVHBgrgTUcysMbsjgBb8kCmBQFr2t1Rj6M4wYAFAj2npxxpiVIqRYkLJ3DbqLR0V92GCz1Kdne28nHLbXbniYcp5jy_IR0sBMmbwPN2LRG2vo4YLe2W9_lzxbX9snHfZqXpRgn6nwI2NNdwiEGm8aP5J2zYcRPr-85ebha3l9-L25_rK4vv90WnQQNRQVaQ5vPciihcdZBI2TXyU6wute1ZaLVwFzF64YpKdApYFUjgDuGvda1OCdfjnt3Kf7Z5wPM4McOQ7BbjPvR1E1Vc60EZObnV-a-HbA3u-QHm57Nf4My4euR8NcHfD7hDMwchNmY2W8z-23mIMy_IMzBXC9v5i7ri6PejxMeTnqbfptKC63M493KqBW_r2_ufholXgDoo4qr</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Soares, C. J.</creator><creator>Roscoe, M. G.</creator><creator>Castro, C. G.</creator><creator>Santana, F. R.</creator><creator>Raposo, L. H. A.</creator><creator>Quagliatto, P. S.</creator><creator>Novais, V. R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars</title><author>Soares, C. J. ; Roscoe, M. G. ; Castro, C. G. ; Santana, F. R. ; Raposo, L. H. A. ; Quagliatto, P. S. ; Novais, V. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-60770b011fe409faf0934cc4c318d78a13b701f62891543ef50169302f1ed7783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Analysis of Variance</topic><topic>Bicuspid - pathology</topic><topic>Bicuspid - radiation effects</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Composite Resins - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dental Amalgam - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dental Materials - radiation effects</topic><topic>Dental Restoration Failure</topic><topic>Dental Restoration, Permanent</topic><topic>Dental Stress Analysis</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>failure mode</topic><topic>fracture strength</topic><topic>Gamma Rays - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maxilla</topic><topic>radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Root Canal Therapy</topic><topic>root filled teeth</topic><topic>Statistics, Nonparametric</topic><topic>strain gauge method</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - etiology</topic><topic>Tooth Fractures - pathology</topic><topic>Tooth, Nonvital - complications</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soares, C. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roscoe, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, F. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raposo, L. H. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quagliatto, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novais, V. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soares, C. J.</au><au>Roscoe, M. G.</au><au>Castro, C. G.</au><au>Santana, F. R.</au><au>Raposo, L. H. A.</au><au>Quagliatto, P. S.</au><au>Novais, V. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars</atitle><jtitle>International endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Int Endod J</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1047</spage><epage>1054</epage><pages>1047-1054</pages><issn>0143-2885</issn><eissn>1365-2591</eissn><abstract>Soares CJ, Roscoe MG, Castro CG, Santana FR, Raposo LHA, Quagliatto PS, Novais VR. Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars. International Endodontic Journal,44, 1047–1054, 2011.
Aim To investigate ex vivo the influence of gamma irradiation therapy and restorative material on fracture resistance, fracture mode and strain of root filled human premolars.
Methodology Sixty extracted human maxillary premolar teeth were randomly divided into six groups (n = 10) determined by two study factors: (i) restorative materials: sound teeth, root filled teeth restored with composite resin, root filled teeth restored with amalgam; (ii) gamma irradiation: irradiated (subjected to 60 Gy of gamma irradiation in daily increments of 2 Gy) and nonirradiated. For the strain gauge test, two strain gauges per sample were attached on the buccal and palatal cusp surfaces (n = 5). Strain values were recorded during loading of 0–150 N. Fracture resistance (N) was assessed in a mechanical testing machine (n = 10). Strain gauge for each cusp and fracture resistance data were analysed by two‐way anova (3 × 2) followed by the Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (α = 0.05). The failure mode was evaluated using an optical stereomicroscope and classified according to the location of the failure.
Results Gamma radiation therapy significantly reduced the fracture resistance of intact teeth. The strain was higher for teeth restored with amalgam than for those restored with composite resin. The teeth restored with composite resin had similar strain values to sound teeth. Nonirradiated teeth had more restorable failures than irradiated teeth.
Conclusions Gamma irradiation significantly reduced fracture resistance and increased cusp strain. The use of composite resin resulted in better biomechanical behaviour than amalgam for restoring root filled teeth whether or not they were submitted to radiotherapy.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>21740445</pmid><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01920.x</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0143-2885 |
ispartof | International endodontic journal, 2011-11, Vol.44 (11), p.1047-1054 |
issn | 0143-2885 1365-2591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_896827530 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Analysis of Variance Bicuspid - pathology Bicuspid - radiation effects Biomechanical Phenomena Case-Control Studies Composite Resins - radiation effects Dental Amalgam - radiation effects Dental Materials - radiation effects Dental Restoration Failure Dental Restoration, Permanent Dental Stress Analysis Dentistry failure mode fracture strength Gamma Rays - adverse effects Humans Maxilla radiotherapy Radiotherapy - adverse effects Radiotherapy Dosage Reference Values Root Canal Therapy root filled teeth Statistics, Nonparametric strain gauge method Tooth Fractures - etiology Tooth Fractures - pathology Tooth, Nonvital - complications |
title | Effect of gamma irradiation and restorative material on the biomechanical behaviour of root filled premolars |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A23%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20gamma%20irradiation%20and%20restorative%20material%20on%20the%20biomechanical%20behaviour%20of%20root%20filled%20premolars&rft.jtitle=International%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Soares,%20C.%20J.&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1047&rft.epage=1054&rft.pages=1047-1054&rft.issn=0143-2885&rft.eissn=1365-2591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01920.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E896827530%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4070-60770b011fe409faf0934cc4c318d78a13b701f62891543ef50169302f1ed7783%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=896827530&rft_id=info:pmid/21740445&rfr_iscdi=true |