Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients with Presumptive Brugada Syndrome Treated with Implanted Defibrillators

• Published in: Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology 2011-10, Vol.22 (10), p.1115-1119
• Main Authors: STEVEN, DANIEL, ROBERTS-THOMSON, KURT C., INADA, KEIICHI, SEILER, JENS, KOPLAN, BRUCE A., TEDROW, USHA B., SWEENEY, MICHEL O., EPSTEIN, LAURENCE E., STEVENSON, WILLIAM G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Boston; Brugada syndrome; Brugada Syndrome - complications; Brugada Syndrome - diagnosis; Brugada Syndrome - physiopathology; Brugada Syndrome - therapy; Death, Sudden, Cardiac - etiology; Death, Sudden, Cardiac - prevention & control; Defibrillators, Implantable - adverse effects; Electric Countershock - adverse effects; Electric Countershock - instrumentation; Electrocardiography; Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac; electrophysiological testing; Female; Humans; implanted cardioverter-defibrillator; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Prosthesis Failure; Retrospective Studies; risk; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; sudden cardiac death; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
• ISSN: 1045-3873; 1540-8167
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02075.x

Long‐Term Follow‐Up in Patients with Brugada Syndrome. Introduction: Risk stratification for patients with suspected Brugada syndrome (BS) remains difficult. Implantation of cardioverter‐defibrillators (ICDs) in high‐risk patients provides continuous long‐term arrhythmia protection. Methods: Data of 33 consecutive patients undergoing ICD implantation after BS evaluation between 1995 and 2008 were reviewed. Results: There were 30 (91%) men and 3 (9%) women (46.4 ± 11.7 years). Type I Brugada was noted in 18 (54.5%), type II in 12 (36.4%) patients, and ST elevation after drug challenge in 3 patients (9.1%). Three patients had prior cardiac arrest; 70% a history of syncope; and 56% ventricular arrhythmias at the electrophysiology study. During 7.9 ± 3.6 years of follow‐up, 2 patients with prior arrest received appropriate ICD shocks. None of the 30 patients without prior arrest had a sustained arrhythmia detected. ICD‐related adverse effects occurred in 11 (33%) patients, including inappropriate shocks in 5 (15%). Eight patients (24%) developed 11 major device‐related complications including subclavian vein thrombosis (1), pericardial effusion (1), lead fracture (2), and infection (2); in 4 patients the only complication was premature battery depletion that required early ICD replacement; however, some of these complications such as lead fractures and early battery depletion may not be specific for this patient cohort and may not repeat in the future. Conclusion: Risk stratification for patients with BS for primary prevention remains challenging. The low risk of arrhythmic events that is exceeded by ICD‐related adverse effects should inform discussions with patients who do not have a prior history of cardiac arrest. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 22, pp. 1115‐1119, October 2011)