Loading…

P2-95 Obesity increases 28% in 3 years in premenopausal low-income Chilean women independently of body size misperception

IntroductionHow body image perception (BIP) influences changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) in adult women has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo assess BMI-changes over a 3-year period and their relationship with BIP in a Chilean women population-based cohort.MethodsWeight and height were measured at basel...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A246-A246
Main Authors: Garmendia, M L, Alonso, F, Kain, J, Corvalan, C, de Aguirre, M, Searle, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page A246
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A246
container_title Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)
container_volume 65
creator Garmendia, M L
Alonso, F
Kain, J
Corvalan, C
de Aguirre, M
Searle, J
description IntroductionHow body image perception (BIP) influences changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) in adult women has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo assess BMI-changes over a 3-year period and their relationship with BIP in a Chilean women population-based cohort.MethodsWeight and height were measured at baseline (32.0±7.0 y) and at follow-up in 510 women participants in the GOCS study. BMI was used to classify women in normal (≤25 kg/m2), overweight (>25 kg/m2), or obese (>30 kg/m2). BIP was self-assessed at baseline using the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (nine figures from very thin to very obese). BIP-discrepancy was defined as the disagreement between measured-BMI and assigned-BMI of the selected figure (defined on a previous validation study). Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the influence of BIP on BMI-changes stratifying by nutritional status and controlling for potential confounders (ie, parity, schooling, age).ResultsAt baseline, 61% had excess weight (37% overweight and 24% obese). In 3 years, this number increased to 70% (38% overweight and 31% obese). One out of 4 increased their BMI category, particularly normal women (28.9% from normal to overweight and 22.5% from overweight to obesity). At baseline, BIP-discrepancy was 66% and was associated to concurrent BMI only in obese (p-for-interaction 0.05, coefficient =−0.45, 95% CI −0.95 to 0.04).ConclusionIn 3 years we observe a large BMI increase among young women of a post-transitional country. Body size misperception does not explain this large increase. Population strategies are needed to stop this detrimental trend.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jech.2011.142976i.30
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899145813</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4013813371</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b2290-f82aa7d8da698440a12791a4d225116aafe91c144caefa8e12ebcafa424e64593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvLG3CwhBCnbD2OE8dHtLSAVLWVCqjiYk2SieoliYOdVQlcuPCiPAlebcWBUy_zR_p9M6P5GHsBYg2Qlydbam7XUgCsQUmjS7fOxSO2AqVFJnVePWYrASrPhChunrJnMW5FKrU0K_bzSmam-PPr92VN0c0Ld2MTCCNFLqtXqeM5XwhD3JdToIFGP-EuYs97f5cl2g_EN7euJxz5XWrGRLY0UQrj3C_cd7z27cKj-0F8cHGi0NA0Oz8esycd9pGe3-cj9uns9OPmfXZ--e7D5s15VktpRNZVElG3VYulqZQSCFIbQNVKWQCUiB0ZaECpBqnDikBS3WCHSioqVWHyI_b6MHcK_tuO4mzTGQ31PY7kd9FWxoAqKsgT-fI_cut3YUzHWdDapF8WZZkodaCa4GMM1NkpuAHDYkHYvSF2b4jdG2LvDbG5SLLsIHNxpu__NBi-2lLnurAXnzfW3FydXQt4a78k_uTA18P2YRv-Ao13np4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1779273566</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>P2-95 Obesity increases 28% in 3 years in premenopausal low-income Chilean women independently of body size misperception</title><source>BMJ journals single titles</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><creator>Garmendia, M L ; Alonso, F ; Kain, J ; Corvalan, C ; de Aguirre, M ; Searle, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Garmendia, M L ; Alonso, F ; Kain, J ; Corvalan, C ; de Aguirre, M ; Searle, J</creatorcontrib><description>IntroductionHow body image perception (BIP) influences changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) in adult women has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo assess BMI-changes over a 3-year period and their relationship with BIP in a Chilean women population-based cohort.MethodsWeight and height were measured at baseline (32.0±7.0 y) and at follow-up in 510 women participants in the GOCS study. BMI was used to classify women in normal (≤25 kg/m2), overweight (&gt;25 kg/m2), or obese (&gt;30 kg/m2). BIP was self-assessed at baseline using the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (nine figures from very thin to very obese). BIP-discrepancy was defined as the disagreement between measured-BMI and assigned-BMI of the selected figure (defined on a previous validation study). Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the influence of BIP on BMI-changes stratifying by nutritional status and controlling for potential confounders (ie, parity, schooling, age).ResultsAt baseline, 61% had excess weight (37% overweight and 24% obese). In 3 years, this number increased to 70% (38% overweight and 31% obese). One out of 4 increased their BMI category, particularly normal women (28.9% from normal to overweight and 22.5% from overweight to obesity). At baseline, BIP-discrepancy was 66% and was associated to concurrent BMI only in obese (p-for-interaction &lt;0.05; coefficientall sample=0.48; 95% CI −0.49 to 1.45; coefficientobese=1.65, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.28). BIP-discrepancy was unrelated to the 3-year changes in BMI (p-for-interaction &gt;0.05, coefficient =−0.45, 95% CI −0.95 to 0.04).ConclusionIn 3 years we observe a large BMI increase among young women of a post-transitional country. Body size misperception does not explain this large increase. Population strategies are needed to stop this detrimental trend.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-2738</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech.2011.142976i.30</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JECHDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Age ; Anthropometry ; Body concept ; Body mass ; Body size ; Females ; Height ; Nutrition ; Nutritional status ; Obesity ; parity ; Perception ; Rating scales ; Socioeconomics ; Strategy ; Weight ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A246-A246</ispartof><rights>2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: 2011 (c) 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A246.2.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jech.bmj.com/content/65/Suppl_1/A246.2.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>112,113,314,780,784,3194,27924,27925,77594,77595</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garmendia, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kain, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corvalan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aguirre, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searle, J</creatorcontrib><title>P2-95 Obesity increases 28% in 3 years in premenopausal low-income Chilean women independently of body size misperception</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><description>IntroductionHow body image perception (BIP) influences changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) in adult women has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo assess BMI-changes over a 3-year period and their relationship with BIP in a Chilean women population-based cohort.MethodsWeight and height were measured at baseline (32.0±7.0 y) and at follow-up in 510 women participants in the GOCS study. BMI was used to classify women in normal (≤25 kg/m2), overweight (&gt;25 kg/m2), or obese (&gt;30 kg/m2). BIP was self-assessed at baseline using the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (nine figures from very thin to very obese). BIP-discrepancy was defined as the disagreement between measured-BMI and assigned-BMI of the selected figure (defined on a previous validation study). Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the influence of BIP on BMI-changes stratifying by nutritional status and controlling for potential confounders (ie, parity, schooling, age).ResultsAt baseline, 61% had excess weight (37% overweight and 24% obese). In 3 years, this number increased to 70% (38% overweight and 31% obese). One out of 4 increased their BMI category, particularly normal women (28.9% from normal to overweight and 22.5% from overweight to obesity). At baseline, BIP-discrepancy was 66% and was associated to concurrent BMI only in obese (p-for-interaction &lt;0.05; coefficientall sample=0.48; 95% CI −0.49 to 1.45; coefficientobese=1.65, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.28). BIP-discrepancy was unrelated to the 3-year changes in BMI (p-for-interaction &gt;0.05, coefficient =−0.45, 95% CI −0.95 to 0.04).ConclusionIn 3 years we observe a large BMI increase among young women of a post-transitional country. Body size misperception does not explain this large increase. Population strategies are needed to stop this detrimental trend.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anthropometry</subject><subject>Body concept</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body size</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional status</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>parity</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Rating scales</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0143-005X</issn><issn>1470-2738</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EEkvLG3CwhBCnbD2OE8dHtLSAVLWVCqjiYk2SieoliYOdVQlcuPCiPAlebcWBUy_zR_p9M6P5GHsBYg2Qlydbam7XUgCsQUmjS7fOxSO2AqVFJnVePWYrASrPhChunrJnMW5FKrU0K_bzSmam-PPr92VN0c0Ld2MTCCNFLqtXqeM5XwhD3JdToIFGP-EuYs97f5cl2g_EN7euJxz5XWrGRLY0UQrj3C_cd7z27cKj-0F8cHGi0NA0Oz8esycd9pGe3-cj9uns9OPmfXZ--e7D5s15VktpRNZVElG3VYulqZQSCFIbQNVKWQCUiB0ZaECpBqnDikBS3WCHSioqVWHyI_b6MHcK_tuO4mzTGQ31PY7kd9FWxoAqKsgT-fI_cut3YUzHWdDapF8WZZkodaCa4GMM1NkpuAHDYkHYvSF2b4jdG2LvDbG5SLLsIHNxpu__NBi-2lLnurAXnzfW3FydXQt4a78k_uTA18P2YRv-Ao13np4</recordid><startdate>20110801</startdate><enddate>20110801</enddate><creator>Garmendia, M L</creator><creator>Alonso, F</creator><creator>Kain, J</creator><creator>Corvalan, C</creator><creator>de Aguirre, M</creator><creator>Searle, J</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110801</creationdate><title>P2-95 Obesity increases 28% in 3 years in premenopausal low-income Chilean women independently of body size misperception</title><author>Garmendia, M L ; Alonso, F ; Kain, J ; Corvalan, C ; de Aguirre, M ; Searle, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2290-f82aa7d8da698440a12791a4d225116aafe91c144caefa8e12ebcafa424e64593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anthropometry</topic><topic>Body concept</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body size</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional status</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>parity</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Rating scales</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garmendia, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alonso, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kain, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corvalan, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Aguirre, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Searle, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garmendia, M L</au><au>Alonso, F</au><au>Kain, J</au><au>Corvalan, C</au><au>de Aguirre, M</au><au>Searle, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>P2-95 Obesity increases 28% in 3 years in premenopausal low-income Chilean women independently of body size misperception</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><addtitle>J Epidemiol Community Health</addtitle><date>2011-08-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A246</spage><epage>A246</epage><pages>A246-A246</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><eissn>1470-2738</eissn><coden>JECHDR</coden><abstract>IntroductionHow body image perception (BIP) influences changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) in adult women has not been evaluated.ObjectiveTo assess BMI-changes over a 3-year period and their relationship with BIP in a Chilean women population-based cohort.MethodsWeight and height were measured at baseline (32.0±7.0 y) and at follow-up in 510 women participants in the GOCS study. BMI was used to classify women in normal (≤25 kg/m2), overweight (&gt;25 kg/m2), or obese (&gt;30 kg/m2). BIP was self-assessed at baseline using the Stunkard Figure Rating Scale (nine figures from very thin to very obese). BIP-discrepancy was defined as the disagreement between measured-BMI and assigned-BMI of the selected figure (defined on a previous validation study). Multivariate linear regression was used to assess the influence of BIP on BMI-changes stratifying by nutritional status and controlling for potential confounders (ie, parity, schooling, age).ResultsAt baseline, 61% had excess weight (37% overweight and 24% obese). In 3 years, this number increased to 70% (38% overweight and 31% obese). One out of 4 increased their BMI category, particularly normal women (28.9% from normal to overweight and 22.5% from overweight to obesity). At baseline, BIP-discrepancy was 66% and was associated to concurrent BMI only in obese (p-for-interaction &lt;0.05; coefficientall sample=0.48; 95% CI −0.49 to 1.45; coefficientobese=1.65, 95% CI 0.03 to 3.28). BIP-discrepancy was unrelated to the 3-year changes in BMI (p-for-interaction &gt;0.05, coefficient =−0.45, 95% CI −0.95 to 0.04).ConclusionIn 3 years we observe a large BMI increase among young women of a post-transitional country. Body size misperception does not explain this large increase. Population strategies are needed to stop this detrimental trend.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/jech.2011.142976i.30</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-005X
ispartof Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2011-08, Vol.65 (Suppl 1), p.A246-A246
issn 0143-005X
1470-2738
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_899145813
source BMJ journals single titles; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection
subjects Age
Anthropometry
Body concept
Body mass
Body size
Females
Height
Nutrition
Nutritional status
Obesity
parity
Perception
Rating scales
Socioeconomics
Strategy
Weight
Women
title P2-95 Obesity increases 28% in 3 years in premenopausal low-income Chilean women independently of body size misperception
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T00%3A27%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=P2-95%E2%80%85Obesity%20increases%2028%25%20in%203%20years%20in%20premenopausal%20low-income%20Chilean%20women%20independently%20of%20body%20size%20misperception&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Garmendia,%20M%20L&rft.date=2011-08-01&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A246&rft.epage=A246&rft.pages=A246-A246&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft.eissn=1470-2738&rft.coden=JECHDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech.2011.142976i.30&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4013813371%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b2290-f82aa7d8da698440a12791a4d225116aafe91c144caefa8e12ebcafa424e64593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1779273566&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true