Loading…
Why some states fail: the role of culture
There are many studies on the relationship between economic development and institutions. Institutions can be classified as formal or informal. This article emphasizes the importance of the relationship between culture (informal institutions) and the quality of public goods supplied by the governmen...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Cato journal 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.59-74 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 74 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | The Cato journal |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Shikida, Claudio D de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco SantAnna, Pedro H.C |
description | There are many studies on the relationship between economic development and institutions. Institutions can be classified as formal or informal. This article emphasizes the importance of the relationship between culture (informal institutions) and the quality of public goods supplied by the government, using a measure of state failure: the Failed States Index. The results suggest that culture is more important than formal institutions in explaining differences in the degree to which states fail. Adapted from the source document. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_900346185</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A252553757</galeid><sourcerecordid>A252553757</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g399t-e691c8b77479bda33568d202cbf5c3c7c934d082e359dd6032500f94260c1ef13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFz0tLw0AQB_AgCtbqdwh6UMHIvh_epPiCghfFY9hsZtOUbaLZzcFv75Z6qFKUgZ1h-c0fZi-bYM1oQZlQ-9kEEZlmJMlhdhTCEiFMOKaT7PJt8ZmHfgV5iCZCyJ1p_U0eF5APvYe8d7kdfRwHOM4OnPEBTr77NHu9v3uZPRbz54en2e28aKjWsQChsVWVlEzqqjaUcqFqgoitHLfUSqspq5EiQLmua4Eo4Qg5zYhAFoPDdJqdb3Lfh_5jhBDLVRsseG866MdQaoTSTVjxf6VSmAkmBE3y4k-JJVGCSanX9PQXXfbj0KWLS8UV41KnwGl2tkGN8VC2nevjYOw6s7wlnHBOJZdJFTtUAx0MxvcduDZ9__DXO3yqGlat3blwtbVQjaHtIKQntM0ihsaMIWzzL-5Mn24</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>858457966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why some states fail: the role of culture</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Shikida, Claudio D ; de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco ; SantAnna, Pedro H.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Shikida, Claudio D ; de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco ; SantAnna, Pedro H.C</creatorcontrib><description>There are many studies on the relationship between economic development and institutions. Institutions can be classified as formal or informal. This article emphasizes the importance of the relationship between culture (informal institutions) and the quality of public goods supplied by the government, using a measure of state failure: the Failed States Index. The results suggest that culture is more important than formal institutions in explaining differences in the degree to which states fail. Adapted from the source document.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-3072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3468</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAJODC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cato Institute</publisher><subject>Civilization ; Constitutional review ; Correlation analysis ; Culture ; Economic analysis ; Economic aspects ; Economic Development ; Failed states ; Federal states ; Growth models ; Indexes ; Influence ; Institutions ; Judges & magistrates ; Public Goods ; Public policy ; Public services ; Regional economics ; Social aspects ; State Failure ; Studies ; Trust ; United States ; Variables</subject><ispartof>The Cato journal, 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.59-74</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2011 Cato Institute</rights><rights>Copyright Cato Institute Winter 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/858457966?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11687,12844,12846,21386,21393,25752,27864,27865,33222,33223,33610,33611,33984,33985,36059,36060,37011,37012,43732,43947,44362,44589</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shikida, Claudio D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SantAnna, Pedro H.C</creatorcontrib><title>Why some states fail: the role of culture</title><title>The Cato journal</title><description>There are many studies on the relationship between economic development and institutions. Institutions can be classified as formal or informal. This article emphasizes the importance of the relationship between culture (informal institutions) and the quality of public goods supplied by the government, using a measure of state failure: the Failed States Index. The results suggest that culture is more important than formal institutions in explaining differences in the degree to which states fail. Adapted from the source document.</description><subject>Civilization</subject><subject>Constitutional review</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Culture</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Failed states</subject><subject>Federal states</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Judges & magistrates</subject><subject>Public Goods</subject><subject>Public policy</subject><subject>Public services</subject><subject>Regional economics</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>State Failure</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trust</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>0273-3072</issn><issn>1943-3468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFz0tLw0AQB_AgCtbqdwh6UMHIvh_epPiCghfFY9hsZtOUbaLZzcFv75Z6qFKUgZ1h-c0fZi-bYM1oQZlQ-9kEEZlmJMlhdhTCEiFMOKaT7PJt8ZmHfgV5iCZCyJ1p_U0eF5APvYe8d7kdfRwHOM4OnPEBTr77NHu9v3uZPRbz54en2e28aKjWsQChsVWVlEzqqjaUcqFqgoitHLfUSqspq5EiQLmua4Eo4Qg5zYhAFoPDdJqdb3Lfh_5jhBDLVRsseG866MdQaoTSTVjxf6VSmAkmBE3y4k-JJVGCSanX9PQXXfbj0KWLS8UV41KnwGl2tkGN8VC2nevjYOw6s7wlnHBOJZdJFTtUAx0MxvcduDZ9__DXO3yqGlat3blwtbVQjaHtIKQntM0ihsaMIWzzL-5Mn24</recordid><startdate>20110101</startdate><enddate>20110101</enddate><creator>Shikida, Claudio D</creator><creator>de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco</creator><creator>SantAnna, Pedro H.C</creator><general>Cato Institute</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110101</creationdate><title>Why some states fail: the role of culture</title><author>Shikida, Claudio D ; de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco ; SantAnna, Pedro H.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g399t-e691c8b77479bda33568d202cbf5c3c7c934d082e359dd6032500f94260c1ef13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Civilization</topic><topic>Constitutional review</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Culture</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Failed states</topic><topic>Federal states</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Judges & magistrates</topic><topic>Public Goods</topic><topic>Public policy</topic><topic>Public services</topic><topic>Regional economics</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>State Failure</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trust</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shikida, Claudio D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SantAnna, Pedro H.C</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale_Business Insights: Global</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shikida, Claudio D</au><au>de Araujo, Jr., Ari Francisco</au><au>SantAnna, Pedro H.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why some states fail: the role of culture</atitle><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle><date>2011-01-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>74</epage><pages>59-74</pages><issn>0273-3072</issn><eissn>1943-3468</eissn><coden>CAJODC</coden><abstract>There are many studies on the relationship between economic development and institutions. Institutions can be classified as formal or informal. This article emphasizes the importance of the relationship between culture (informal institutions) and the quality of public goods supplied by the government, using a measure of state failure: the Failed States Index. The results suggest that culture is more important than formal institutions in explaining differences in the degree to which states fail. Adapted from the source document.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cato Institute</pub><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-3072 |
ispartof | The Cato journal, 2011-01, Vol.31 (1), p.59-74 |
issn | 0273-3072 1943-3468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_900346185 |
source | EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate【Trial: -2024/12/31】【Remote access available】; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Civilization Constitutional review Correlation analysis Culture Economic analysis Economic aspects Economic Development Failed states Federal states Growth models Indexes Influence Institutions Judges & magistrates Public Goods Public policy Public services Regional economics Social aspects State Failure Studies Trust United States Variables |
title | Why some states fail: the role of culture |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T04%3A03%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20some%20states%20fail:%20the%20role%20of%20culture&rft.jtitle=The%20Cato%20journal&rft.au=Shikida,%20Claudio%20D&rft.date=2011-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=74&rft.pages=59-74&rft.issn=0273-3072&rft.eissn=1943-3468&rft.coden=CAJODC&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA252553757%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g399t-e691c8b77479bda33568d202cbf5c3c7c934d082e359dd6032500f94260c1ef13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=858457966&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A252553757&rfr_iscdi=true |