Loading…
The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements
The signal‐dependent bias of MR images has been considered a hindrance to visual interpretation almost since the beginning of clinical MRI. Over time, a variety of procedures have been suggested to produce less‐biased images from the complex average of repeated measurements. In this work, we re‐eval...
Saved in:
Published in: | Magnetic resonance in medicine 2011-11, Vol.66 (5), p.1456-1467 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-ff6a38e72488abb871a697537bfaa2020573590d1bf30a3f14c1f784503e9bf23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-ff6a38e72488abb871a697537bfaa2020573590d1bf30a3f14c1f784503e9bf23 |
container_end_page | 1467 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1456 |
container_title | Magnetic resonance in medicine |
container_volume | 66 |
creator | Tisdall, M. Dylan Lockhart, Richard A. Atkins, M. Stella |
description | The signal‐dependent bias of MR images has been considered a hindrance to visual interpretation almost since the beginning of clinical MRI. Over time, a variety of procedures have been suggested to produce less‐biased images from the complex average of repeated measurements. In this work, we re‐evaluate these approaches using first a survey of previous estimators in the MRI literature, then a survey of the methods statisticians employ for our specific problem. Our conclusions are substantially different from much of the previous work: first, removing bias completely is impossible if we demand the estimator have bounded variance; second, reducing bias may not be beneficial to image quality. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/mrm.22910 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_900622979</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>900622979</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-ff6a38e72488abb871a697537bfaa2020573590d1bf30a3f14c1f784503e9bf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1v1DAURS0EokNhwR9A3iEW6TzbSRwv0aidVuqANCrq0npJnqeGOBnspB__ntBpu-vqLd65V7qHsc8CTgSAXIYYTqQ0At6whSikzGRh8rdsATqHTAmTH7EPKf0GAGN0_p4dSZGXRlR6waarG-K1x7S8xeixb4iPEVvKBuf43Q31nNLoA46-3_FxZjdbnvyux44H3PV-nFriLg7h8dkMYd_RPcdbirgjPjgeaU84UssDYZoiBerH9JG9c9gl-vR0j9mvs9Or1Xl2-XN9sfp-mTXKaMicK1FVpGVeVVjXlRZYGl0oXTtECRIKrQoDraidAlRO5I1wusoLUGRqJ9Ux-3ro3cfh7zQvscGnhroOexqmZA1AOYvTZia_HcgmDilFcnYf59nxwQqw_yXbWbJ9lDyzX55apzpQ-0I-W52B5QG48x09vN5kN9vNc2V2SPg00v1LAuMfW2qlC3v9Y2236_NrfbaSVqp_SxaWNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>900622979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Tisdall, M. Dylan ; Lockhart, Richard A. ; Atkins, M. Stella</creator><creatorcontrib>Tisdall, M. Dylan ; Lockhart, Richard A. ; Atkins, M. Stella</creatorcontrib><description>The signal‐dependent bias of MR images has been considered a hindrance to visual interpretation almost since the beginning of clinical MRI. Over time, a variety of procedures have been suggested to produce less‐biased images from the complex average of repeated measurements. In this work, we re‐evaluate these approaches using first a survey of previous estimators in the MRI literature, then a survey of the methods statisticians employ for our specific problem. Our conclusions are substantially different from much of the previous work: first, removing bias completely is impossible if we demand the estimator have bounded variance; second, reducing bias may not be beneficial to image quality. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0740-3194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2594</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22910</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21469187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Bayes Theorem ; Bias ; Computers ; denoising ; image bias ; Likelihood Functions ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Mathematics ; maximum likelihood estimate ; nuisance parameters ; Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><ispartof>Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011-11, Vol.66 (5), p.1456-1467</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-ff6a38e72488abb871a697537bfaa2020573590d1bf30a3f14c1f784503e9bf23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-ff6a38e72488abb871a697537bfaa2020573590d1bf30a3f14c1f784503e9bf23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21469187$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tisdall, M. Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockhart, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, M. Stella</creatorcontrib><title>The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements</title><title>Magnetic resonance in medicine</title><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><description>The signal‐dependent bias of MR images has been considered a hindrance to visual interpretation almost since the beginning of clinical MRI. Over time, a variety of procedures have been suggested to produce less‐biased images from the complex average of repeated measurements. In this work, we re‐evaluate these approaches using first a survey of previous estimators in the MRI literature, then a survey of the methods statisticians employ for our specific problem. Our conclusions are substantially different from much of the previous work: first, removing bias completely is impossible if we demand the estimator have bounded variance; second, reducing bias may not be beneficial to image quality. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Bayes Theorem</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>denoising</subject><subject>image bias</subject><subject>Likelihood Functions</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>maximum likelihood estimate</subject><subject>nuisance parameters</subject><subject>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</subject><issn>0740-3194</issn><issn>1522-2594</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1v1DAURS0EokNhwR9A3iEW6TzbSRwv0aidVuqANCrq0npJnqeGOBnspB__ntBpu-vqLd65V7qHsc8CTgSAXIYYTqQ0At6whSikzGRh8rdsATqHTAmTH7EPKf0GAGN0_p4dSZGXRlR6waarG-K1x7S8xeixb4iPEVvKBuf43Q31nNLoA46-3_FxZjdbnvyux44H3PV-nFriLg7h8dkMYd_RPcdbirgjPjgeaU84UssDYZoiBerH9JG9c9gl-vR0j9mvs9Or1Xl2-XN9sfp-mTXKaMicK1FVpGVeVVjXlRZYGl0oXTtECRIKrQoDraidAlRO5I1wusoLUGRqJ9Ux-3ro3cfh7zQvscGnhroOexqmZA1AOYvTZia_HcgmDilFcnYf59nxwQqw_yXbWbJ9lDyzX55apzpQ-0I-W52B5QG48x09vN5kN9vNc2V2SPg00v1LAuMfW2qlC3v9Y2236_NrfbaSVqp_SxaWNg</recordid><startdate>201111</startdate><enddate>201111</enddate><creator>Tisdall, M. Dylan</creator><creator>Lockhart, Richard A.</creator><creator>Atkins, M. Stella</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201111</creationdate><title>The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements</title><author>Tisdall, M. Dylan ; Lockhart, Richard A. ; Atkins, M. Stella</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-ff6a38e72488abb871a697537bfaa2020573590d1bf30a3f14c1f784503e9bf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Bayes Theorem</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>denoising</topic><topic>image bias</topic><topic>Likelihood Functions</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>maximum likelihood estimate</topic><topic>nuisance parameters</topic><topic>Signal-To-Noise Ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tisdall, M. Dylan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lockhart, Richard A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atkins, M. Stella</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tisdall, M. Dylan</au><au>Lockhart, Richard A.</au><au>Atkins, M. Stella</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements</atitle><jtitle>Magnetic resonance in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Magn. Reson. Med</addtitle><date>2011-11</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1456</spage><epage>1467</epage><pages>1456-1467</pages><issn>0740-3194</issn><eissn>1522-2594</eissn><abstract>The signal‐dependent bias of MR images has been considered a hindrance to visual interpretation almost since the beginning of clinical MRI. Over time, a variety of procedures have been suggested to produce less‐biased images from the complex average of repeated measurements. In this work, we re‐evaluate these approaches using first a survey of previous estimators in the MRI literature, then a survey of the methods statisticians employ for our specific problem. Our conclusions are substantially different from much of the previous work: first, removing bias completely is impossible if we demand the estimator have bounded variance; second, reducing bias may not be beneficial to image quality. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>21469187</pmid><doi>10.1002/mrm.22910</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0740-3194 |
ispartof | Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2011-11, Vol.66 (5), p.1456-1467 |
issn | 0740-3194 1522-2594 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_900622979 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Bayes Theorem Bias Computers denoising image bias Likelihood Functions Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Mathematics maximum likelihood estimate nuisance parameters Signal-To-Noise Ratio |
title | The bias/variance trade-off when estimating the MR signal magnitude from the complex average of repeated measurements |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T14%3A21%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20bias/variance%20trade-off%20when%20estimating%20the%20MR%20signal%20magnitude%20from%20the%20complex%20average%20of%20repeated%20measurements&rft.jtitle=Magnetic%20resonance%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Tisdall,%20M.%20Dylan&rft.date=2011-11&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1456&rft.epage=1467&rft.pages=1456-1467&rft.issn=0740-3194&rft.eissn=1522-2594&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/mrm.22910&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E900622979%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3970-ff6a38e72488abb871a697537bfaa2020573590d1bf30a3f14c1f784503e9bf23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=900622979&rft_id=info:pmid/21469187&rfr_iscdi=true |