Loading…
Dynamic competition in technological investments: An empirical examination of the LCD panel industry
When are technological laggards more likely to try to catch up with leaders? We offer empirical evidence on firm-level data of plant investments in the TFT-LCD panel industry, where technological competition has been intense and dynamic. We find that the followers' level of technology has a non...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of industrial organization 2011-11, Vol.29 (6), p.718-728 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ca5ea4ef193faa53c6cc835cc736cba4a23c97b17c35d33346aa028ddf2583213 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ca5ea4ef193faa53c6cc835cc736cba4a23c97b17c35d33346aa028ddf2583213 |
container_end_page | 728 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 718 |
container_title | International journal of industrial organization |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Lee, Jeongsik Kim, Byung-Cheol Lim, Young-Mo |
description | When are technological laggards more likely to try to catch up with leaders? We offer empirical evidence on firm-level data of plant investments in the TFT-LCD panel industry, where technological competition has been intense and dynamic. We find that the followers' level of technology has a non-monotonic effect on technology-improving investments, with intermediate followers the most apt to invest in catch-ups. This result is a puzzle given the existing theory on technology race. We also find that followers' catch-up investments increase with the capacity of the leader that employs the state-of-the-art technology. These results are robust to variations in specification and alternative accounts of effects. We discuss our findings and contributions in light of the technology race literature.
► We offer evidence on dynamic technology competition in the TFT-LCD panel industry. ► Followers with medium technology indexes are most apt to make catchup investments. ► This supports action–reaction rather than increasing dominance as race pattern. ► Catchup investments also increase with industry's cutting-edge technology capacity. ► This finding confirms that followers strive to catch up not to fall too far behind. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.03.006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_901180400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167718711000312</els_id><sourcerecordid>901180400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ca5ea4ef193faa53c6cc835cc736cba4a23c97b17c35d33346aa028ddf2583213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QRYvnnZNNvvpyVI_oeBFzyGdnW2z7CZrkhb7702tXrwIAwMz7zu88xByyWjCKCtuukR1SjfGrpKUMpZQnlBaHJEJq0oel3VVHJNJEJZxGSan5My5jlKahZqQ5n6n5aAgAjOM6JVXRkdKRx5hrU1vVgpkHwZbdH5A7d1tNNMRDqOy3xv8DG4tv22mjfwao8X8Phqlxr2t2Thvd-fkpJW9w4ufPiXvjw9v8-d48fr0Mp8tYsgp9THIHGWGLat5K2XOoQCoeA5Q8gKWMpMph7pcshJ43nDOs0JKmlZN06Z5xVPGp-T6cHe05mMTEotBOcC-D2nMxok64Kn2jwfl1R9lZzZWh3CiqqsyzVKaBVFxEIE1zllsxWjVIO1OMCr26EUnftGLPXpBuQjog_HuYMTw7FahFQ4UasBGWQQvGqP-O_EFPliRlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>898724204</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic competition in technological investments: An empirical examination of the LCD panel industry</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Lee, Jeongsik ; Kim, Byung-Cheol ; Lim, Young-Mo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongsik ; Kim, Byung-Cheol ; Lim, Young-Mo</creatorcontrib><description>When are technological laggards more likely to try to catch up with leaders? We offer empirical evidence on firm-level data of plant investments in the TFT-LCD panel industry, where technological competition has been intense and dynamic. We find that the followers' level of technology has a non-monotonic effect on technology-improving investments, with intermediate followers the most apt to invest in catch-ups. This result is a puzzle given the existing theory on technology race. We also find that followers' catch-up investments increase with the capacity of the leader that employs the state-of-the-art technology. These results are robust to variations in specification and alternative accounts of effects. We discuss our findings and contributions in light of the technology race literature.
► We offer evidence on dynamic technology competition in the TFT-LCD panel industry. ► Followers with medium technology indexes are most apt to make catchup investments. ► This supports action–reaction rather than increasing dominance as race pattern. ► Catchup investments also increase with industry's cutting-edge technology capacity. ► This finding confirms that followers strive to catch up not to fall too far behind.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7187</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7986</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.03.006</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJIODY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Catch-up investment ; Competition ; Dynamics ; Firm heterogeneity ; Industrial economics ; Industrial production ; Innovation ; Investment analysis ; Investment decision ; LCD industry ; LCDs ; Leadership competition ; Liquid crystal displays ; New technology ; Studies ; Technological change ; Technology race</subject><ispartof>International journal of industrial organization, 2011-11, Vol.29 (6), p.718-728</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Nov 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ca5ea4ef193faa53c6cc835cc736cba4a23c97b17c35d33346aa028ddf2583213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ca5ea4ef193faa53c6cc835cc736cba4a23c97b17c35d33346aa028ddf2583213</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byung-Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Young-Mo</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic competition in technological investments: An empirical examination of the LCD panel industry</title><title>International journal of industrial organization</title><description>When are technological laggards more likely to try to catch up with leaders? We offer empirical evidence on firm-level data of plant investments in the TFT-LCD panel industry, where technological competition has been intense and dynamic. We find that the followers' level of technology has a non-monotonic effect on technology-improving investments, with intermediate followers the most apt to invest in catch-ups. This result is a puzzle given the existing theory on technology race. We also find that followers' catch-up investments increase with the capacity of the leader that employs the state-of-the-art technology. These results are robust to variations in specification and alternative accounts of effects. We discuss our findings and contributions in light of the technology race literature.
► We offer evidence on dynamic technology competition in the TFT-LCD panel industry. ► Followers with medium technology indexes are most apt to make catchup investments. ► This supports action–reaction rather than increasing dominance as race pattern. ► Catchup investments also increase with industry's cutting-edge technology capacity. ► This finding confirms that followers strive to catch up not to fall too far behind.</description><subject>Catch-up investment</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Firm heterogeneity</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Industrial production</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Investment analysis</subject><subject>Investment decision</subject><subject>LCD industry</subject><subject>LCDs</subject><subject>Leadership competition</subject><subject>Liquid crystal displays</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology race</subject><issn>0167-7187</issn><issn>1873-7986</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKt_QRYvnnZNNvvpyVI_oeBFzyGdnW2z7CZrkhb7702tXrwIAwMz7zu88xByyWjCKCtuukR1SjfGrpKUMpZQnlBaHJEJq0oel3VVHJNJEJZxGSan5My5jlKahZqQ5n6n5aAgAjOM6JVXRkdKRx5hrU1vVgpkHwZbdH5A7d1tNNMRDqOy3xv8DG4tv22mjfwao8X8Phqlxr2t2Thvd-fkpJW9w4ufPiXvjw9v8-d48fr0Mp8tYsgp9THIHGWGLat5K2XOoQCoeA5Q8gKWMpMph7pcshJ43nDOs0JKmlZN06Z5xVPGp-T6cHe05mMTEotBOcC-D2nMxok64Kn2jwfl1R9lZzZWh3CiqqsyzVKaBVFxEIE1zllsxWjVIO1OMCr26EUnftGLPXpBuQjog_HuYMTw7FahFQ4UasBGWQQvGqP-O_EFPliRlQ</recordid><startdate>20111101</startdate><enddate>20111101</enddate><creator>Lee, Jeongsik</creator><creator>Kim, Byung-Cheol</creator><creator>Lim, Young-Mo</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111101</creationdate><title>Dynamic competition in technological investments: An empirical examination of the LCD panel industry</title><author>Lee, Jeongsik ; Kim, Byung-Cheol ; Lim, Young-Mo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ca5ea4ef193faa53c6cc835cc736cba4a23c97b17c35d33346aa028ddf2583213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Catch-up investment</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Firm heterogeneity</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Industrial production</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Investment analysis</topic><topic>Investment decision</topic><topic>LCD industry</topic><topic>LCDs</topic><topic>Leadership competition</topic><topic>Liquid crystal displays</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology race</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeongsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Byung-Cheol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, Young-Mo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of industrial organization</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Jeongsik</au><au>Kim, Byung-Cheol</au><au>Lim, Young-Mo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic competition in technological investments: An empirical examination of the LCD panel industry</atitle><jtitle>International journal of industrial organization</jtitle><date>2011-11-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>718</spage><epage>728</epage><pages>718-728</pages><issn>0167-7187</issn><eissn>1873-7986</eissn><coden>IJIODY</coden><abstract>When are technological laggards more likely to try to catch up with leaders? We offer empirical evidence on firm-level data of plant investments in the TFT-LCD panel industry, where technological competition has been intense and dynamic. We find that the followers' level of technology has a non-monotonic effect on technology-improving investments, with intermediate followers the most apt to invest in catch-ups. This result is a puzzle given the existing theory on technology race. We also find that followers' catch-up investments increase with the capacity of the leader that employs the state-of-the-art technology. These results are robust to variations in specification and alternative accounts of effects. We discuss our findings and contributions in light of the technology race literature.
► We offer evidence on dynamic technology competition in the TFT-LCD panel industry. ► Followers with medium technology indexes are most apt to make catchup investments. ► This supports action–reaction rather than increasing dominance as race pattern. ► Catchup investments also increase with industry's cutting-edge technology capacity. ► This finding confirms that followers strive to catch up not to fall too far behind.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.03.006</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-7187 |
ispartof | International journal of industrial organization, 2011-11, Vol.29 (6), p.718-728 |
issn | 0167-7187 1873-7986 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_901180400 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Catch-up investment Competition Dynamics Firm heterogeneity Industrial economics Industrial production Innovation Investment analysis Investment decision LCD industry LCDs Leadership competition Liquid crystal displays New technology Studies Technological change Technology race |
title | Dynamic competition in technological investments: An empirical examination of the LCD panel industry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T07%3A37%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20competition%20in%20technological%20investments:%20An%20empirical%20examination%20of%20the%20LCD%20panel%20industry&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20industrial%20organization&rft.au=Lee,%20Jeongsik&rft.date=2011-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=718&rft.epage=728&rft.pages=718-728&rft.issn=0167-7187&rft.eissn=1873-7986&rft.coden=IJIODY&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2011.03.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E901180400%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c500t-ca5ea4ef193faa53c6cc835cc736cba4a23c97b17c35d33346aa028ddf2583213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=898724204&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |