Loading…

Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design

During conceptual design, engineers deal with incomplete product descriptions called design concepts. Engineers must compare these concepts in order to move towards the more desirable designs. However, comparisons are difficult because a single concept associates with numerous possible final design...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Computer aided design 2009-03, Vol.41 (3), p.214-227
Main Authors: Malak, Richard J., Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew, Paredis, Christiaan J.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-234c35fc3bb922f6f6bb3e7ba5bd76daa700cb00ac2b6c64582b0fc7e6a5144e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-234c35fc3bb922f6f6bb3e7ba5bd76daa700cb00ac2b6c64582b0fc7e6a5144e3
container_end_page 227
container_issue 3
container_start_page 214
container_title Computer aided design
container_volume 41
creator Malak, Richard J.
Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew
Paredis, Christiaan J.J.
description During conceptual design, engineers deal with incomplete product descriptions called design concepts. Engineers must compare these concepts in order to move towards the more desirable designs. However, comparisons are difficult because a single concept associates with numerous possible final design specifications, and any meaningful comparison of concepts must consider this range of possibilities. Consequently, the performance of a concept can only be characterized imprecisely. While standard multi-attribute utility theory is an accepted framework for making preference-based decisions between precisely characterized alternatives, it does not directly accommodate the analysis of imprecisely characterized alternatives. By extending uncertainty representations to model imprecision explicitly, it is possible to apply the principles of utility theory to such problems. However, this can lead to situations of indeterminacy, meaning that the decision maker is unable to identify a single concept as the most preferred. Under a set-based perspective and approach to design, a designer can work towards a single solution systematically despite indecision arising from imprecise characterizations of design concepts. Existing work in set-based design primarily focuses on feasibility conditions and single-attribute objectives, which are insufficient for most design problems. In this article, we combine the framework of multi-attribute utility theory, the perspective of set-based design, and the explicit mathematical representation of imprecision into a single approach to conceptual design. Each of the component theories is discussed, and their combined application developed. The approach is illustrated using the conceptual design of a fixed-ratio power transmission as an example. Additionally, important directions for future research are identified, with a particular focus on the process of modeling abstract design concepts.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_901686503</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010448508001309</els_id><sourcerecordid>34255739</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-234c35fc3bb922f6f6bb3e7ba5bd76daa700cb00ac2b6c64582b0fc7e6a5144e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMoOI7-AHdd6ar15tkWFyLiC0bc6Dok6a1k6LRjkgrz780wrl3dzTkf3EPIJYWKAlU368qZrmIATQWqAhBHZEGbui2ZauQxWQBQKIVo5Ck5i3ENAIzydkHu3uYh-dKkFLydExZz8oNPu8KMZthFHws_FhFTaU3ErnDT6HCbZjMUHUb_NZ6Tk94MES_-7pJ8Pj1-PLyUq_fn14f7VemEalPJuHBc9o5b2zLWq15Zy7G2RtquVp0xNYCzAMYxq5wSsmEWelejMpIKgXxJrg-72zB9zxiT3vjocBjMiNMcdZsjNEoCz-TVvyQXTMqatxmkB9CFKcaAvd4GvzFhpynofVS91jmq3kfVoHSOmp3bg4P51x-PQUfnMTfpfECXdDf5f-xf_OJ_yQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34255739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Malak, Richard J. ; Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew ; Paredis, Christiaan J.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malak, Richard J. ; Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew ; Paredis, Christiaan J.J.</creatorcontrib><description>During conceptual design, engineers deal with incomplete product descriptions called design concepts. Engineers must compare these concepts in order to move towards the more desirable designs. However, comparisons are difficult because a single concept associates with numerous possible final design specifications, and any meaningful comparison of concepts must consider this range of possibilities. Consequently, the performance of a concept can only be characterized imprecisely. While standard multi-attribute utility theory is an accepted framework for making preference-based decisions between precisely characterized alternatives, it does not directly accommodate the analysis of imprecisely characterized alternatives. By extending uncertainty representations to model imprecision explicitly, it is possible to apply the principles of utility theory to such problems. However, this can lead to situations of indeterminacy, meaning that the decision maker is unable to identify a single concept as the most preferred. Under a set-based perspective and approach to design, a designer can work towards a single solution systematically despite indecision arising from imprecise characterizations of design concepts. Existing work in set-based design primarily focuses on feasibility conditions and single-attribute objectives, which are insufficient for most design problems. In this article, we combine the framework of multi-attribute utility theory, the perspective of set-based design, and the explicit mathematical representation of imprecision into a single approach to conceptual design. Each of the component theories is discussed, and their combined application developed. The approach is illustrated using the conceptual design of a fixed-ratio power transmission as an example. Additionally, important directions for future research are identified, with a particular focus on the process of modeling abstract design concepts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-4485</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2685</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Concept evaluation ; Decision-based design ; Descriptions ; Design engineering ; Mathematical models ; Multi-attribute utility theory ; Power transmission ; Representations ; Set-based design ; Specifications ; Uncertainty in design ; Utilities</subject><ispartof>Computer aided design, 2009-03, Vol.41 (3), p.214-227</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-234c35fc3bb922f6f6bb3e7ba5bd76daa700cb00ac2b6c64582b0fc7e6a5144e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-234c35fc3bb922f6f6bb3e7ba5bd76daa700cb00ac2b6c64582b0fc7e6a5144e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malak, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paredis, Christiaan J.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design</title><title>Computer aided design</title><description>During conceptual design, engineers deal with incomplete product descriptions called design concepts. Engineers must compare these concepts in order to move towards the more desirable designs. However, comparisons are difficult because a single concept associates with numerous possible final design specifications, and any meaningful comparison of concepts must consider this range of possibilities. Consequently, the performance of a concept can only be characterized imprecisely. While standard multi-attribute utility theory is an accepted framework for making preference-based decisions between precisely characterized alternatives, it does not directly accommodate the analysis of imprecisely characterized alternatives. By extending uncertainty representations to model imprecision explicitly, it is possible to apply the principles of utility theory to such problems. However, this can lead to situations of indeterminacy, meaning that the decision maker is unable to identify a single concept as the most preferred. Under a set-based perspective and approach to design, a designer can work towards a single solution systematically despite indecision arising from imprecise characterizations of design concepts. Existing work in set-based design primarily focuses on feasibility conditions and single-attribute objectives, which are insufficient for most design problems. In this article, we combine the framework of multi-attribute utility theory, the perspective of set-based design, and the explicit mathematical representation of imprecision into a single approach to conceptual design. Each of the component theories is discussed, and their combined application developed. The approach is illustrated using the conceptual design of a fixed-ratio power transmission as an example. Additionally, important directions for future research are identified, with a particular focus on the process of modeling abstract design concepts.</description><subject>Concept evaluation</subject><subject>Decision-based design</subject><subject>Descriptions</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multi-attribute utility theory</subject><subject>Power transmission</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Set-based design</subject><subject>Specifications</subject><subject>Uncertainty in design</subject><subject>Utilities</subject><issn>0010-4485</issn><issn>1879-2685</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLxDAURoMoOI7-AHdd6ar15tkWFyLiC0bc6Dok6a1k6LRjkgrz780wrl3dzTkf3EPIJYWKAlU368qZrmIATQWqAhBHZEGbui2ZauQxWQBQKIVo5Ck5i3ENAIzydkHu3uYh-dKkFLydExZz8oNPu8KMZthFHws_FhFTaU3ErnDT6HCbZjMUHUb_NZ6Tk94MES_-7pJ8Pj1-PLyUq_fn14f7VemEalPJuHBc9o5b2zLWq15Zy7G2RtquVp0xNYCzAMYxq5wSsmEWelejMpIKgXxJrg-72zB9zxiT3vjocBjMiNMcdZsjNEoCz-TVvyQXTMqatxmkB9CFKcaAvd4GvzFhpynofVS91jmq3kfVoHSOmp3bg4P51x-PQUfnMTfpfECXdDf5f-xf_OJ_yQ</recordid><startdate>20090301</startdate><enddate>20090301</enddate><creator>Malak, Richard J.</creator><creator>Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew</creator><creator>Paredis, Christiaan J.J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090301</creationdate><title>Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design</title><author>Malak, Richard J. ; Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew ; Paredis, Christiaan J.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-234c35fc3bb922f6f6bb3e7ba5bd76daa700cb00ac2b6c64582b0fc7e6a5144e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Concept evaluation</topic><topic>Decision-based design</topic><topic>Descriptions</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multi-attribute utility theory</topic><topic>Power transmission</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Set-based design</topic><topic>Specifications</topic><topic>Uncertainty in design</topic><topic>Utilities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malak, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paredis, Christiaan J.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computer aided design</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malak, Richard J.</au><au>Aughenbaugh, Jason Matthew</au><au>Paredis, Christiaan J.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design</atitle><jtitle>Computer aided design</jtitle><date>2009-03-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>214</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>214-227</pages><issn>0010-4485</issn><eissn>1879-2685</eissn><abstract>During conceptual design, engineers deal with incomplete product descriptions called design concepts. Engineers must compare these concepts in order to move towards the more desirable designs. However, comparisons are difficult because a single concept associates with numerous possible final design specifications, and any meaningful comparison of concepts must consider this range of possibilities. Consequently, the performance of a concept can only be characterized imprecisely. While standard multi-attribute utility theory is an accepted framework for making preference-based decisions between precisely characterized alternatives, it does not directly accommodate the analysis of imprecisely characterized alternatives. By extending uncertainty representations to model imprecision explicitly, it is possible to apply the principles of utility theory to such problems. However, this can lead to situations of indeterminacy, meaning that the decision maker is unable to identify a single concept as the most preferred. Under a set-based perspective and approach to design, a designer can work towards a single solution systematically despite indecision arising from imprecise characterizations of design concepts. Existing work in set-based design primarily focuses on feasibility conditions and single-attribute objectives, which are insufficient for most design problems. In this article, we combine the framework of multi-attribute utility theory, the perspective of set-based design, and the explicit mathematical representation of imprecision into a single approach to conceptual design. Each of the component theories is discussed, and their combined application developed. The approach is illustrated using the conceptual design of a fixed-ratio power transmission as an example. Additionally, important directions for future research are identified, with a particular focus on the process of modeling abstract design concepts.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.004</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0010-4485
ispartof Computer aided design, 2009-03, Vol.41 (3), p.214-227
issn 0010-4485
1879-2685
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_901686503
source Elsevier
subjects Concept evaluation
Decision-based design
Descriptions
Design engineering
Mathematical models
Multi-attribute utility theory
Power transmission
Representations
Set-based design
Specifications
Uncertainty in design
Utilities
title Multi-attribute utility analysis in set-based conceptual design
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T23%3A03%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multi-attribute%20utility%20analysis%20in%20set-based%20conceptual%20design&rft.jtitle=Computer%20aided%20design&rft.au=Malak,%20Richard%20J.&rft.date=2009-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=214&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=214-227&rft.issn=0010-4485&rft.eissn=1879-2685&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cad.2008.06.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E34255739%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-234c35fc3bb922f6f6bb3e7ba5bd76daa700cb00ac2b6c64582b0fc7e6a5144e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34255739&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true