Energy Choices and Risk Beliefs: Is It Just Global Warming and Fear of a Nuclear Power Plant Accident?

A survey of 3,200 U.S. residents focused on two issues associated with the use of nuclear and coal fuels to produce electrical energy. The first was the association between risk beliefs and preferences for coal and nuclear energy. As expected, concern about nuclear power plant accidents led to decre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Risk analysis 2011-05, Vol.31 (5), p.819-831
Main Authors: Greenberg, Michael, Truelove, Heather Barnes
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accidents
African-Americans
Age
Analysis
Associations
Benefits
Coal
Coal-fired power plants
Electric Power Supplies
Energy
Energy policy
Energy resources
Fear
Fuel
Global Warming
Hearing
Hispanics
Humans
Life cycles
Management
nuclear accidents
Nuclear accidents & safety
Nuclear energy
Nuclear engineering
Nuclear power generation
Nuclear power plants
Nuclear reactor components
Nuclear reactors
Population policy
preferences
Public opinion
Radioactive Hazard Release
Risk
Risk Assessment
Risk management
Studies
Surveys
U.S.A
waste management
Whites
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A survey of 3,200 U.S. residents focused on two issues associated with the use of nuclear and coal fuels to produce electrical energy. The first was the association between risk beliefs and preferences for coal and nuclear energy. As expected, concern about nuclear power plant accidents led to decreased support for nuclear power, and those who believed that coal causes global warming preferred less coal use. Yet other risk beliefs about the coal and nuclear energy fuel cycles were stronger or equal correlates of public preferences. The second issue is the existence of what we call acknowledged risk takers, respondents who favored increased reliance on nuclear energy, although also noting that there could be a serious nuclear plant accident, and those who favored greater coal use, despite acknowledging a link to global warming. The pro‐nuclear group disproportionately was affluent educated white males, and the pro‐coal group was relatively poor less educated African‐American and Latino females. Yet both shared four similarities: older age, trust in management, belief that the energy facilities help the local economy, and individualistic personal values. These findings show that there is no single public with regard to energy preferences and risk beliefs. Rather, there are multiple populations with different viewpoints that surely would benefit by hearing a clear and comprehensive national energy life cycle policy from the national government.
ISSN:0272-4332
1539-6924
DOI:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01535.x