From “our world” to the “real world”: Exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers

• Published in: Social science & medicine (1982) 2011-04, Vol.72 (7), p.1047-1055
• Main Authors: Haynes, Abby S., Derrick, Gjemma E., Chapman, Simon, Redman, Sally, Hall, Wayne D., Gillespie, James, Sturk, Heidi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Advocacy; Attitude to Health; Australia; Behavior; Biological and medical sciences; Cooperation; Evidence; Evidence-Based Medicine; Government policy; Health care policy; Humans; Information Dissemination; Information Dissemination - methods; Interdisciplinary Communication; Knowledge transfer; Mass Media; Mass Media Effects; Medical sciences; Miscellaneous; Peer Review, Research; Policy; Policy Making; Professional Role; Public Health; Public health. Hygiene; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine; Qualitative Research; Research Design; Research impact; Research impact Public health Evidence Policy Knowledge transfer Research translation Australia; Research Personnel - psychology; Research translation; Social Goals; Studies; Telecommunications Policy; Values
• ISSN: 0277-9536; 1873-5347
• DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.004

Research and researchers influence the genesis and development of public health policy in limited but essential ways. Surveys and interviews with 36 peer-nominated “highly influential” Australian public health researchers found they engaged in a breadth of strategies that included rigorous but targeted research design, multilateral collaboration, multiple methods of research dissemination and promotion (including tactical use of the media), and purposeful development of bridging relationships. Researchers’ ability to understand the worlds of research, policy and the media and to speak their languages (or to work with others who fulfilled this role) was a key factor. Advocacy was seen as fundamental by some but was disparaged by others. Influential behaviours were guided by values and beliefs about the principles underlying traditional science and the contrasting ethos of contemporary research. This study may help researchers consider their own policy-related roles, strategies and relationships in the context of increasing calls for research that serves economic and/or social goals. ►Surveys and interviews were conducted with 36 peer-nominated “highly influential” Australian public health researchers. ►Findings showed that influential researchers were policy strategists who facilitated research utilisation in multiple ways. ►Behaviours were guided by values and beliefs about the principles underlying traditional science and contemporary research. ►Academic awards and incentives need to recognise and support policy-influential behaviours.