Loading…

Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea

► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioresource technology 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9550-9557
Main Authors: Moon, Ji-Hong, Lee, Jeung-Woo, Lee, Uen-Do
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3
container_end_page 9557
container_issue 20
container_start_page 9550
container_title Bioresource technology
container_volume 102
creator Moon, Ji-Hong
Lee, Jeung-Woo
Lee, Uen-Do
description ► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea. An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902357833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960852411009916</els_id><sourcerecordid>890678023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB3ALgVgZ_AvDF8Q4pNhx4jg30LQBYhLTys7Wi_PcukriYqer-ifwX89Ru3FjJx_e5_2wvoSccTbnjMvP63njfBjRrOY543zOqjkr-Asy46oSWV5X8iWZsVqyTJV5cULexLhmjAle5a_JSc5VKXnJZ-TvpfGD752hMEC3jy5Sb2ma3UOMdON3GOgSBwwwOj_QaFbYY6TboU2FkAo7aDqkk1juqRvc6JK8R7pz44rePoGbdKz1nfN0McLQQmgjPb-9WXxKPfSnDwhvySsLXcR3x_eU3F1d_r74nl3_-vbj4ut1Zgolx6xpW8HRtLUViqMsGsiZRFEagznY9C1swGJbcdvUtgRgCgFNkxuGTAhEcUo-HuZugv-zxTjq3kWDXQcD-m3UNctFWSkhnpWqZrJSiSd5_l_JZcUFL0Q5UXmgJvgYA1q9Ca6HsNec6SlavdaP0eopWs0qnaJNjWfHHdumx_ap7THLBD4cAUQDnQ0wGBf_uaIsa1UUyb0_OAtewzIkc7dImwrGuBKqmsSXg8CUw73DoKNxOBhsXUAz6ta75659APoa0fM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671314353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Moon, Ji-Hong ; Lee, Jeung-Woo ; Lee, Uen-Do</creator><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ji-Hong ; Lee, Jeung-Woo ; Lee, Uen-Do</creatorcontrib><description>► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea. An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21856151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass combustion ; Biomass gasification ; Combustion ; Conservation of Energy Resources - economics ; Cost engineering ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Economic feasibility ; Economics ; electricity ; Feasibility Studies ; fuels ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gasification ; heat ; infrastructure ; Models, Economic ; Power generation ; prices ; renewable energy sources ; Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) ; Republic of Korea ; Sales ; steam ; systems analysis ; turbines</subject><ispartof>Bioresource technology, 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9550-9557</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=24559844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21856151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ji-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Uen-Do</creatorcontrib><title>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</title><title>Bioresource technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea. An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass combustion</subject><subject>Biomass gasification</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Conservation of Energy Resources - economics</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Economic feasibility</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>fuels</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>prices</subject><subject>renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>steam</subject><subject>systems analysis</subject><subject>turbines</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB3ALgVgZ_AvDF8Q4pNhx4jg30LQBYhLTys7Wi_PcukriYqer-ifwX89Ru3FjJx_e5_2wvoSccTbnjMvP63njfBjRrOY543zOqjkr-Asy46oSWV5X8iWZsVqyTJV5cULexLhmjAle5a_JSc5VKXnJZ-TvpfGD752hMEC3jy5Sb2ma3UOMdON3GOgSBwwwOj_QaFbYY6TboU2FkAo7aDqkk1juqRvc6JK8R7pz44rePoGbdKz1nfN0McLQQmgjPb-9WXxKPfSnDwhvySsLXcR3x_eU3F1d_r74nl3_-vbj4ut1Zgolx6xpW8HRtLUViqMsGsiZRFEagznY9C1swGJbcdvUtgRgCgFNkxuGTAhEcUo-HuZugv-zxTjq3kWDXQcD-m3UNctFWSkhnpWqZrJSiSd5_l_JZcUFL0Q5UXmgJvgYA1q9Ca6HsNec6SlavdaP0eopWs0qnaJNjWfHHdumx_ap7THLBD4cAUQDnQ0wGBf_uaIsa1UUyb0_OAtewzIkc7dImwrGuBKqmsSXg8CUw73DoKNxOBhsXUAz6ta75659APoa0fM</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Moon, Ji-Hong</creator><creator>Lee, Jeung-Woo</creator><creator>Lee, Uen-Do</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</title><author>Moon, Ji-Hong ; Lee, Jeung-Woo ; Lee, Uen-Do</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass combustion</topic><topic>Biomass gasification</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Conservation of Energy Resources - economics</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Economic feasibility</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>fuels</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>prices</topic><topic>renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>steam</topic><topic>systems analysis</topic><topic>turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ji-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Uen-Do</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moon, Ji-Hong</au><au>Lee, Jeung-Woo</au><au>Lee, Uen-Do</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>9550</spage><epage>9557</epage><pages>9550-9557</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea. An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21856151</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0960-8524
ispartof Bioresource technology, 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9550-9557
issn 0960-8524
1873-2976
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902357833
source Elsevier
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Biomass combustion
Biomass gasification
Combustion
Conservation of Energy Resources - economics
Cost engineering
Costs and Cost Analysis
Economic feasibility
Economics
electricity
Feasibility Studies
fuels
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gasification
heat
infrastructure
Models, Economic
Power generation
prices
renewable energy sources
Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)
Republic of Korea
Sales
steam
systems analysis
turbines
title Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20analysis%20of%20biomass%20power%20generation%20schemes%20under%20renewable%20energy%20initiative%20with%20Renewable%20Portfolio%20Standards%20(RPS)%20in%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20technology&rft.au=Moon,%20Ji-Hong&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=9550&rft.epage=9557&rft.pages=9550-9557&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E890678023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671314353&rft_id=info:pmid/21856151&rfr_iscdi=true