Loading…
Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea
► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to...
Saved in:
Published in: | Bioresource technology 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9550-9557 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3 |
container_end_page | 9557 |
container_issue | 20 |
container_start_page | 9550 |
container_title | Bioresource technology |
container_volume | 102 |
creator | Moon, Ji-Hong Lee, Jeung-Woo Lee, Uen-Do |
description | ► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea.
An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902357833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0960852411009916</els_id><sourcerecordid>890678023</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB3ALgVgZ_AvDF8Q4pNhx4jg30LQBYhLTys7Wi_PcukriYqer-ifwX89Ru3FjJx_e5_2wvoSccTbnjMvP63njfBjRrOY543zOqjkr-Asy46oSWV5X8iWZsVqyTJV5cULexLhmjAle5a_JSc5VKXnJZ-TvpfGD752hMEC3jy5Sb2ma3UOMdON3GOgSBwwwOj_QaFbYY6TboU2FkAo7aDqkk1juqRvc6JK8R7pz44rePoGbdKz1nfN0McLQQmgjPb-9WXxKPfSnDwhvySsLXcR3x_eU3F1d_r74nl3_-vbj4ut1Zgolx6xpW8HRtLUViqMsGsiZRFEagznY9C1swGJbcdvUtgRgCgFNkxuGTAhEcUo-HuZugv-zxTjq3kWDXQcD-m3UNctFWSkhnpWqZrJSiSd5_l_JZcUFL0Q5UXmgJvgYA1q9Ca6HsNec6SlavdaP0eopWs0qnaJNjWfHHdumx_ap7THLBD4cAUQDnQ0wGBf_uaIsa1UUyb0_OAtewzIkc7dImwrGuBKqmsSXg8CUw73DoKNxOBhsXUAz6ta75659APoa0fM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1671314353</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Moon, Ji-Hong ; Lee, Jeung-Woo ; Lee, Uen-Do</creator><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ji-Hong ; Lee, Jeung-Woo ; Lee, Uen-Do</creatorcontrib><description>► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea.
An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-8524</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2976</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21856151</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Biomass combustion ; Biomass gasification ; Combustion ; Conservation of Energy Resources - economics ; Cost engineering ; Costs and Cost Analysis ; Economic feasibility ; Economics ; electricity ; Feasibility Studies ; fuels ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gasification ; heat ; infrastructure ; Models, Economic ; Power generation ; prices ; renewable energy sources ; Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) ; Republic of Korea ; Sales ; steam ; systems analysis ; turbines</subject><ispartof>Bioresource technology, 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9550-9557</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=24559844$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21856151$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ji-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Uen-Do</creatorcontrib><title>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</title><title>Bioresource technology</title><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><description>► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea.
An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomass combustion</subject><subject>Biomass gasification</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Conservation of Energy Resources - economics</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Costs and Cost Analysis</subject><subject>Economic feasibility</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>electricity</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>fuels</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>heat</subject><subject>infrastructure</subject><subject>Models, Economic</subject><subject>Power generation</subject><subject>prices</subject><subject>renewable energy sources</subject><subject>Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)</subject><subject>Republic of Korea</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>steam</subject><subject>systems analysis</subject><subject>turbines</subject><issn>0960-8524</issn><issn>1873-2976</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c9v0zAUB3ALgVgZ_AvDF8Q4pNhx4jg30LQBYhLTys7Wi_PcukriYqer-ifwX89Ru3FjJx_e5_2wvoSccTbnjMvP63njfBjRrOY543zOqjkr-Asy46oSWV5X8iWZsVqyTJV5cULexLhmjAle5a_JSc5VKXnJZ-TvpfGD752hMEC3jy5Sb2ma3UOMdON3GOgSBwwwOj_QaFbYY6TboU2FkAo7aDqkk1juqRvc6JK8R7pz44rePoGbdKz1nfN0McLQQmgjPb-9WXxKPfSnDwhvySsLXcR3x_eU3F1d_r74nl3_-vbj4ut1Zgolx6xpW8HRtLUViqMsGsiZRFEagznY9C1swGJbcdvUtgRgCgFNkxuGTAhEcUo-HuZugv-zxTjq3kWDXQcD-m3UNctFWSkhnpWqZrJSiSd5_l_JZcUFL0Q5UXmgJvgYA1q9Ca6HsNec6SlavdaP0eopWs0qnaJNjWfHHdumx_ap7THLBD4cAUQDnQ0wGBf_uaIsa1UUyb0_OAtewzIkc7dImwrGuBKqmsSXg8CUw73DoKNxOBhsXUAz6ta75659APoa0fM</recordid><startdate>20111001</startdate><enddate>20111001</enddate><creator>Moon, Ji-Hong</creator><creator>Lee, Jeung-Woo</creator><creator>Lee, Uen-Do</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111001</creationdate><title>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</title><author>Moon, Ji-Hong ; Lee, Jeung-Woo ; Lee, Uen-Do</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomass combustion</topic><topic>Biomass gasification</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Conservation of Energy Resources - economics</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Costs and Cost Analysis</topic><topic>Economic feasibility</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>electricity</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>fuels</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>heat</topic><topic>infrastructure</topic><topic>Models, Economic</topic><topic>Power generation</topic><topic>prices</topic><topic>renewable energy sources</topic><topic>Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS)</topic><topic>Republic of Korea</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>steam</topic><topic>systems analysis</topic><topic>turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moon, Ji-Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jeung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Uen-Do</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moon, Ji-Hong</au><au>Lee, Jeung-Woo</au><au>Lee, Uen-Do</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea</atitle><jtitle>Bioresource technology</jtitle><addtitle>Bioresour Technol</addtitle><date>2011-10-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>9550</spage><epage>9557</epage><pages>9550-9557</pages><issn>0960-8524</issn><eissn>1873-2976</eissn><abstract>► We analyze economic feasibilities of two strategies of biomass use in Korea. ► Direct combustion–steam turbine and gasification–gas engine were investigated. ► Gasification system is more profitable than combustion system in smaller facilities. ► Biomass gasification CHP plants ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe are suitable in Korea.
An economic analysis of biomass power generation was conducted. Two key technologies—direct combustion with a steam turbine and gasification with a syngas engine—were mainly examined. In view of the present domestic biomass infrastructure of Korea, a small and distributed power generation system ranging from 0.5 to 5MWe was considered. It was found that gasification with a syngas engine becomes more economically feasible as the plant size decreases. Changes in the economic feasibilities with and without RPS or heat sales were also investigated. A sensitivity analysis of each system was conducted for representative parameters. Regarding the cost of electricity generation, electrical efficiency and fuel cost significantly affect both direct combustion and gasification systems. Regarding the internal rate of return (IRR), the heat sales price becomes important for obtaining a higher IRR, followed by power generation capacity and electrical efficiency.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>21856151</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-8524 |
ispartof | Bioresource technology, 2011-10, Vol.102 (20), p.9550-9557 |
issn | 0960-8524 1873-2976 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902357833 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Biomass Biomass combustion Biomass gasification Combustion Conservation of Energy Resources - economics Cost engineering Costs and Cost Analysis Economic feasibility Economics electricity Feasibility Studies fuels Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gasification heat infrastructure Models, Economic Power generation prices renewable energy sources Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) Republic of Korea Sales steam systems analysis turbines |
title | Economic analysis of biomass power generation schemes under renewable energy initiative with Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPS) in Korea |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20analysis%20of%20biomass%20power%20generation%20schemes%20under%20renewable%20energy%20initiative%20with%20Renewable%20Portfolio%20Standards%20(RPS)%20in%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Bioresource%20technology&rft.au=Moon,%20Ji-Hong&rft.date=2011-10-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=9550&rft.epage=9557&rft.pages=9550-9557&rft.issn=0960-8524&rft.eissn=1873-2976&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.041&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E890678023%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c486t-bdd31ecd9f381e64ba206e35cce2af856ebafed71fb9f5aa08eaecb2c0e033ee3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1671314353&rft_id=info:pmid/21856151&rfr_iscdi=true |