Measuring the discrepancy between fecundity and lifetime reproductive success in a pollinating fig wasp

• Published in: Entomologia experimentalis et applicata 2011-09, Vol.140 (3), p.218-225
• Main Authors: Dunn, Derek W., Jansen-González, Sergio, Cook, James M., Yu, Douglas W., Pereira, Rodrigo A. S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Agaonidae; Animal reproduction; Biological and medical sciences; Breeding success; Canker; Data processing; egg count; egg load; Eggs; Fecundity; Females; Ficus; fitness; Flowers; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Hymenoptera; Insecta; Invertebrates; Moraceae; Mutualism; Ovaries; Oviposition; Pegoscapus; Pollinators; Progeny; Seeds; Success; Trees; wasp gall
• ISSN: 0013-8703; 1570-7458
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1570-7458.2011.01151.x

Lifetime reproductive success in female insects is often egg‐ or time‐limited. For instance in pro‐ovigenic species, when oviposition sites are abundant, females may quickly become devoid of eggs. Conversely, in the absence of suitable oviposition sites, females may die before laying all of their eggs. In pollinating fig wasps (Hymenoptera: Agaonidae), each species has an obligate mutualism with its host fig tree species [Ficus spp. (Moraceae)]. These pro‐ovigenic wasps oviposit in individual ovaries within the inflorescences of monoecious Ficus (syconia, or ‘figs’), which contain many flowers. Each female flower can thus become a seed or be converted into a wasp gall. The mystery is that the wasps never oviposit in all fig ovaries, even when a fig contains enough wasp females with enough eggs to do so. The failure of all wasps to translate all of their eggs into offspring clearly contributes to mutualism persistence, but the underlying causal mechanisms are unclear. We found in an undescribed Brazilian Pegoscapus wasp population that the lifetime reproductive success of lone foundresses was relatively unaffected by constraints on oviposition. The number of offspring produced by lone foundresses experimentally introduced into receptive figs was generally lower than the numbers of eggs carried, despite the fact that the wasps were able to lay all or most of their eggs. Because we excluded any effects of intraspecific competitors and parasitic non‐pollinating wasps, our data suggest that some pollinators produce few offspring because some of their eggs or larvae are unviable or are victims of plant defences.