Implant and biological type effects on beef carcass characteristics

Beef carcasses ( n = 1574) were evaluated at Excel Corp. beef slaughtering facility, Friona, Texas, to determine the effects of implants (double Revalor and Ralgro/Revalor) and biological type (Continental European, Continental European × British and British) on carcass characteristics. No differenc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Meat science 1995, Vol.41 (1), p.47-53
Main Authors: Kerth, C.R., Miller, M.F., Owen, B.L., Brophy, B.H., Ramsey, C.B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal productions
Biological and medical sciences
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Meat and meat product industries
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f5ce429c196a0e111f1d277133ca597315a56bd4cb39b2337d818b62e7135a0f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f5ce429c196a0e111f1d277133ca597315a56bd4cb39b2337d818b62e7135a0f3
container_end_page 53
container_issue 1
container_start_page 47
container_title Meat science
container_volume 41
creator Kerth, C.R.
Miller, M.F.
Owen, B.L.
Brophy, B.H.
Ramsey, C.B.
description Beef carcasses ( n = 1574) were evaluated at Excel Corp. beef slaughtering facility, Friona, Texas, to determine the effects of implants (double Revalor and Ralgro/Revalor) and biological type (Continental European, Continental European × British and British) on carcass characteristics. No differences ( P > 0.05) were found between implants for marbling score, USDA quality grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, or carcass weight. Carcasses from cattle implanted with double Revalor had a larger ( P < 0.05) ribeye area and a lower USDA yield grade. No differences were found among breed types for marbling score, USDA quality grade, preliminary yield grade, ribeye area or USDA yield grade ( P > 0.05). Steers classed as continental European had the lowest adjusted preliminary yield grade and percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, the heaviest carcasses and were most muscular as determined by the Excel muscle score ( P < 0.05).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0309-1740(94)00050-H
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902806772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>030917409400050H</els_id><sourcerecordid>902806772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f5ce429c196a0e111f1d277133ca597315a56bd4cb39b2337d818b62e7135a0f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1PGzEQgGGrApE08A-qag9ItIeFGXu_fEFCETRISFzK2fLOjltXm93U3iDx7-uQNEdOvjwzHr1CfEG4RsDqBhToHOsCvuniOwCUkK8-iTk2tcoLVM2JmB_JTHyO8U9CqGRzJmZSQgWIci6Wj-tNb4cps0OXtX7sx1-ebJ9NbxvO2DmmKWbjkLXMLiMbyMaY0W8bLE0cfJw8xXNx6mwf-eLwLsTLw_3P5Sp_ev7xuLx7yklpmHJXEhdSE-rKAiOiw07WNSpFttS1wtKWVdsV1CrdSqXqrsGmrSQnUlpwaiGu9ns3Yfy75TiZtY_Efbqfx200GmQDVV3LJIu9pDDGGNiZTfBrG94MgtnVM7s0ZpfG6MK81zOrNPb18MG2XXN3HPqfK4HLA7AxVXLBDuTj0amyKKXExG73jFONV8_BRPI8EHc-pKCmG_3Hh_wDOFOJoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902806772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implant and biological type effects on beef carcass characteristics</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kerth, C.R. ; Miller, M.F. ; Owen, B.L. ; Brophy, B.H. ; Ramsey, C.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kerth, C.R. ; Miller, M.F. ; Owen, B.L. ; Brophy, B.H. ; Ramsey, C.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Beef carcasses ( n = 1574) were evaluated at Excel Corp. beef slaughtering facility, Friona, Texas, to determine the effects of implants (double Revalor and Ralgro/Revalor) and biological type (Continental European, Continental European × British and British) on carcass characteristics. No differences ( P &gt; 0.05) were found between implants for marbling score, USDA quality grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, or carcass weight. Carcasses from cattle implanted with double Revalor had a larger ( P &lt; 0.05) ribeye area and a lower USDA yield grade. No differences were found among breed types for marbling score, USDA quality grade, preliminary yield grade, ribeye area or USDA yield grade ( P &gt; 0.05). Steers classed as continental European had the lowest adjusted preliminary yield grade and percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, the heaviest carcasses and were most muscular as determined by the Excel muscle score ( P &lt; 0.05).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0309-1740(94)00050-H</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22060112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MESCDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Meat and meat product industries ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 1995, Vol.41 (1), p.47-53</ispartof><rights>1995</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 1995. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f5ce429c196a0e111f1d277133ca597315a56bd4cb39b2337d818b62e7135a0f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f5ce429c196a0e111f1d277133ca597315a56bd4cb39b2337d818b62e7135a0f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3545221$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22060112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kerth, C.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, B.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brophy, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, C.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Implant and biological type effects on beef carcass characteristics</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>Beef carcasses ( n = 1574) were evaluated at Excel Corp. beef slaughtering facility, Friona, Texas, to determine the effects of implants (double Revalor and Ralgro/Revalor) and biological type (Continental European, Continental European × British and British) on carcass characteristics. No differences ( P &gt; 0.05) were found between implants for marbling score, USDA quality grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, or carcass weight. Carcasses from cattle implanted with double Revalor had a larger ( P &lt; 0.05) ribeye area and a lower USDA yield grade. No differences were found among breed types for marbling score, USDA quality grade, preliminary yield grade, ribeye area or USDA yield grade ( P &gt; 0.05). Steers classed as continental European had the lowest adjusted preliminary yield grade and percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, the heaviest carcasses and were most muscular as determined by the Excel muscle score ( P &lt; 0.05).</description><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1PGzEQgGGrApE08A-qag9ItIeFGXu_fEFCETRISFzK2fLOjltXm93U3iDx7-uQNEdOvjwzHr1CfEG4RsDqBhToHOsCvuniOwCUkK8-iTk2tcoLVM2JmB_JTHyO8U9CqGRzJmZSQgWIci6Wj-tNb4cps0OXtX7sx1-ebJ9NbxvO2DmmKWbjkLXMLiMbyMaY0W8bLE0cfJw8xXNx6mwf-eLwLsTLw_3P5Sp_ev7xuLx7yklpmHJXEhdSE-rKAiOiw07WNSpFttS1wtKWVdsV1CrdSqXqrsGmrSQnUlpwaiGu9ns3Yfy75TiZtY_Efbqfx200GmQDVV3LJIu9pDDGGNiZTfBrG94MgtnVM7s0ZpfG6MK81zOrNPb18MG2XXN3HPqfK4HLA7AxVXLBDuTj0amyKKXExG73jFONV8_BRPI8EHc-pKCmG_3Hh_wDOFOJoQ</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Kerth, C.R.</creator><creator>Miller, M.F.</creator><creator>Owen, B.L.</creator><creator>Brophy, B.H.</creator><creator>Ramsey, C.B.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Implant and biological type effects on beef carcass characteristics</title><author>Kerth, C.R. ; Miller, M.F. ; Owen, B.L. ; Brophy, B.H. ; Ramsey, C.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f5ce429c196a0e111f1d277133ca597315a56bd4cb39b2337d818b62e7135a0f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kerth, C.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, M.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, B.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brophy, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, C.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kerth, C.R.</au><au>Miller, M.F.</au><au>Owen, B.L.</au><au>Brophy, B.H.</au><au>Ramsey, C.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implant and biological type effects on beef carcass characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>47</spage><epage>53</epage><pages>47-53</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><coden>MESCDN</coden><abstract>Beef carcasses ( n = 1574) were evaluated at Excel Corp. beef slaughtering facility, Friona, Texas, to determine the effects of implants (double Revalor and Ralgro/Revalor) and biological type (Continental European, Continental European × British and British) on carcass characteristics. No differences ( P &gt; 0.05) were found between implants for marbling score, USDA quality grade, adjusted preliminary yield grade, percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, or carcass weight. Carcasses from cattle implanted with double Revalor had a larger ( P &lt; 0.05) ribeye area and a lower USDA yield grade. No differences were found among breed types for marbling score, USDA quality grade, preliminary yield grade, ribeye area or USDA yield grade ( P &gt; 0.05). Steers classed as continental European had the lowest adjusted preliminary yield grade and percentage kidney, pelvic and heart fat, the heaviest carcasses and were most muscular as determined by the Excel muscle score ( P &lt; 0.05).</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22060112</pmid><doi>10.1016/0309-1740(94)00050-H</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1740
ispartof Meat science, 1995, Vol.41 (1), p.47-53
issn 0309-1740
1873-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902806772
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Animal productions
Biological and medical sciences
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Meat and meat product industries
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
title Implant and biological type effects on beef carcass characteristics
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T18%3A57%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implant%20and%20biological%20type%20effects%20on%20beef%20carcass%20characteristics&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Kerth,%20C.R.&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=47&rft.epage=53&rft.pages=47-53&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft.coden=MESCDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0309-1740(94)00050-H&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902806772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-f5ce429c196a0e111f1d277133ca597315a56bd4cb39b2337d818b62e7135a0f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902806772&rft_id=info:pmid/22060112&rfr_iscdi=true