Loading…

Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef

The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle anti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Meat science 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.662-667
Main Authors: Wu, C., Duckett, S.K., Neel, J.P.S., Fontenot, J.P., Clapham, W.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323
container_end_page 667
container_issue 3
container_start_page 662
container_title Meat science
container_volume 80
creator Wu, C.
Duckett, S.K.
Neel, J.P.S.
Fontenot, J.P.
Clapham, W.M.
description The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902807161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309174008000612</els_id><sourcerecordid>902807161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4B8QcBhw9hOHedUVSselSpVQnC2Jo7d9Sqxg51F5N_jaLdw5DQa6ZvXN4S8ZlAxYPLjoRotztn4igOoCkQFIJ6QDVON2NZMqKdkAwLaLWtquCAvcj4AABNcPScXnIMUV027IeE2uOFog7E0Oup88HnvwwPNS57tmGkMdL_0KU57P3hDMfR08NNjGn8vDzbQhL03OFDsckwdrs0MTmj8vND3999udh-oD7Sz1r0kzxwO2b46x0vy4_On77uv27v7L7e7m7utEW09l_2NUQxMLV2DRijkPZdo2qbmRlpXc8DO9artRK2gxlaaBlUngbNO2nKjuCTvTn2nFH8ebZ716LOxw4DBxmPWLXAFDZOskFcn0qSYc7JOT8mPmBbNQK-m9UGfTevVtAahi-lS9-Y84diNtv9b9ai2AG_PAOYix6Xixed_HMhGKbVy1yfOFh-_vE26jFof0vtkzaz76P-zyh8cuJ-D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902807161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wu, C. ; Duckett, S.K. ; Neel, J.P.S. ; Fontenot, J.P. ; Clapham, W.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, C. ; Duckett, S.K. ; Neel, J.P.S. ; Fontenot, J.P. ; Clapham, W.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22063579</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MESCDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antioxidants ; Beef ; Biological and medical sciences ; Food industries ; Forages ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Meat and meat product industries ; ORAC</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.662-667</ispartof><rights>2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20678889$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22063579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckett, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, J.P.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenot, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapham, W.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC.</description><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Forages</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>ORAC</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4B8QcBhw9hOHedUVSselSpVQnC2Jo7d9Sqxg51F5N_jaLdw5DQa6ZvXN4S8ZlAxYPLjoRotztn4igOoCkQFIJ6QDVON2NZMqKdkAwLaLWtquCAvcj4AABNcPScXnIMUV027IeE2uOFog7E0Oup88HnvwwPNS57tmGkMdL_0KU57P3hDMfR08NNjGn8vDzbQhL03OFDsckwdrs0MTmj8vND3999udh-oD7Sz1r0kzxwO2b46x0vy4_On77uv27v7L7e7m7utEW09l_2NUQxMLV2DRijkPZdo2qbmRlpXc8DO9artRK2gxlaaBlUngbNO2nKjuCTvTn2nFH8ebZ716LOxw4DBxmPWLXAFDZOskFcn0qSYc7JOT8mPmBbNQK-m9UGfTevVtAahi-lS9-Y84diNtv9b9ai2AG_PAOYix6Xixed_HMhGKbVy1yfOFh-_vE26jFof0vtkzaz76P-zyh8cuJ-D</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Wu, C.</creator><creator>Duckett, S.K.</creator><creator>Neel, J.P.S.</creator><creator>Fontenot, J.P.</creator><creator>Clapham, W.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</title><author>Wu, C. ; Duckett, S.K. ; Neel, J.P.S. ; Fontenot, J.P. ; Clapham, W.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Forages</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>ORAC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckett, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, J.P.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenot, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapham, W.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, C.</au><au>Duckett, S.K.</au><au>Neel, J.P.S.</au><au>Fontenot, J.P.</au><au>Clapham, W.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>662-667</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><coden>MESCDN</coden><abstract>The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22063579</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1740
ispartof Meat science, 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.662-667
issn 0309-1740
1873-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902807161
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Antioxidants
Beef
Biological and medical sciences
Food industries
Forages
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Meat and meat product industries
ORAC
title Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20finishing%20systems%20on%20hydrophilic%20and%20lipophilic%20oxygen%20radical%20absorbance%20capacity%20(ORAC)%20in%20beef&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Wu,%20C.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=662-667&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft.coden=MESCDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902807161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902807161&rft_id=info:pmid/22063579&rfr_iscdi=true