Loading…
Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef
The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle anti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Meat science 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.662-667 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323 |
container_end_page | 667 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 662 |
container_title | Meat science |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Wu, C. Duckett, S.K. Neel, J.P.S. Fontenot, J.P. Clapham, W.M. |
description | The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902807161</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309174008000612</els_id><sourcerecordid>902807161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4B8QcBhw9hOHedUVSselSpVQnC2Jo7d9Sqxg51F5N_jaLdw5DQa6ZvXN4S8ZlAxYPLjoRotztn4igOoCkQFIJ6QDVON2NZMqKdkAwLaLWtquCAvcj4AABNcPScXnIMUV027IeE2uOFog7E0Oup88HnvwwPNS57tmGkMdL_0KU57P3hDMfR08NNjGn8vDzbQhL03OFDsckwdrs0MTmj8vND3999udh-oD7Sz1r0kzxwO2b46x0vy4_On77uv27v7L7e7m7utEW09l_2NUQxMLV2DRijkPZdo2qbmRlpXc8DO9artRK2gxlaaBlUngbNO2nKjuCTvTn2nFH8ebZ716LOxw4DBxmPWLXAFDZOskFcn0qSYc7JOT8mPmBbNQK-m9UGfTevVtAahi-lS9-Y84diNtv9b9ai2AG_PAOYix6Xixed_HMhGKbVy1yfOFh-_vE26jFof0vtkzaz76P-zyh8cuJ-D</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902807161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Wu, C. ; Duckett, S.K. ; Neel, J.P.S. ; Fontenot, J.P. ; Clapham, W.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, C. ; Duckett, S.K. ; Neel, J.P.S. ; Fontenot, J.P. ; Clapham, W.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22063579</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MESCDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Antioxidants ; Beef ; Biological and medical sciences ; Food industries ; Forages ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Meat and meat product industries ; ORAC</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.662-667</ispartof><rights>2008</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20678889$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22063579$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckett, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, J.P.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenot, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapham, W.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC.</description><subject>Antioxidants</subject><subject>Beef</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Forages</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>ORAC</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUtv1DAQgC0EokvhJ4B8QcBhw9hOHedUVSselSpVQnC2Jo7d9Sqxg51F5N_jaLdw5DQa6ZvXN4S8ZlAxYPLjoRotztn4igOoCkQFIJ6QDVON2NZMqKdkAwLaLWtquCAvcj4AABNcPScXnIMUV027IeE2uOFog7E0Oup88HnvwwPNS57tmGkMdL_0KU57P3hDMfR08NNjGn8vDzbQhL03OFDsckwdrs0MTmj8vND3999udh-oD7Sz1r0kzxwO2b46x0vy4_On77uv27v7L7e7m7utEW09l_2NUQxMLV2DRijkPZdo2qbmRlpXc8DO9artRK2gxlaaBlUngbNO2nKjuCTvTn2nFH8ebZ716LOxw4DBxmPWLXAFDZOskFcn0qSYc7JOT8mPmBbNQK-m9UGfTevVtAahi-lS9-Y84diNtv9b9ai2AG_PAOYix6Xixed_HMhGKbVy1yfOFh-_vE26jFof0vtkzaz76P-zyh8cuJ-D</recordid><startdate>20081101</startdate><enddate>20081101</enddate><creator>Wu, C.</creator><creator>Duckett, S.K.</creator><creator>Neel, J.P.S.</creator><creator>Fontenot, J.P.</creator><creator>Clapham, W.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20081101</creationdate><title>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</title><author>Wu, C. ; Duckett, S.K. ; Neel, J.P.S. ; Fontenot, J.P. ; Clapham, W.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Antioxidants</topic><topic>Beef</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Forages</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>ORAC</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duckett, S.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neel, J.P.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fontenot, J.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapham, W.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, C.</au><au>Duckett, S.K.</au><au>Neel, J.P.S.</au><au>Fontenot, J.P.</au><au>Clapham, W.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>2008-11-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>662</spage><epage>667</epage><pages>662-667</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><coden>MESCDN</coden><abstract>The aim of this research was to: (1) develop a reliable extraction procedure and assay to determine antioxidant activity in meat products, and (2) assess the effect of beef finishing system (forage-finished: alfalfa, pearl millet or mixed pastures vs. concentrate-finished) on longissimus muscle antioxidant activity. The effect of extraction method (ethanol concentration and extraction time), protein removal, and sample preparation method (pulverization or freeze drying) were first evaluated to develop an antioxidant assay for meat products. Beef extracts prepared with low ethanol concentrations (20%) demonstrated higher hydrophilic ORAC. Protein removal prior to extraction reduced hydrophilic ORAC values. Sample preparation method influenced both hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC, with pulverized samples containing higher hydrophilic and lipophilic ORAC values. Beef cattle finishing system (Forage: alfalfa, pearl millet, or natural pasture vs. concentrates) had little impact on muscle hydrophilic ORAC, but muscle from forage finished beef contained greater lipophilic ORAC. In addition, broiling of steaks reduced hydrophilic ORAC.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22063579</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1740 |
ispartof | Meat science, 2008-11, Vol.80 (3), p.662-667 |
issn | 0309-1740 1873-4138 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902807161 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Antioxidants Beef Biological and medical sciences Food industries Forages Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Meat and meat product industries ORAC |
title | Influence of finishing systems on hydrophilic and lipophilic oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) in beef |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T02%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Influence%20of%20finishing%20systems%20on%20hydrophilic%20and%20lipophilic%20oxygen%20radical%20absorbance%20capacity%20(ORAC)%20in%20beef&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=Wu,%20C.&rft.date=2008-11-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=662&rft.epage=667&rft.pages=662-667&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft.coden=MESCDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902807161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-41cc810c46f7ac38a2d26ac9742c6ef420abfd89b34804a96c7a8b6021b6e1323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902807161&rft_id=info:pmid/22063579&rfr_iscdi=true |