Loading…
No More Larking Around!Why We Need Male LARCs
The disparity between the number and types of female and male long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARCs) is problematic for at least two reasons: first, because it forces women to assume most of the financial and health-related responsibilities of contraception, and second, because men's re...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Hastings Center report 2011-09, Vol.41 (5), p.22-26 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The disparity between the number and types of female and male long-acting, reversible contraceptives (LARCs) is problematic for at least two reasons: first, because it forces women to assume most of the financial and health-related responsibilities of contraception, and second, because men's reproductive autonomy is diminished by it. In order to understand how to change current contraceptive arrangement, Campo-Engelstein examines some of the historical and contemporary factors that contribute to this disparity, especially gender norms that associate women with reproduction and distance men from it. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0093-0334 1552-146X |
DOI: | 10.1002/j.1552-146X.2011.tb00137.x |