Loading…

A sensory map of the meat universe. Sensory profile of meat from 15 species

The aim of the study was to investigate if meat from different species could be described and related to each other by sensory analysis. Muscle meat from 15 different species commercially available in Norway was assessed by a 22 sensory attribute profile and analysed by multivariate analysis. The di...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Meat science 2004-09, Vol.68 (1), p.137-144
Main Authors: Rødbotten, Marit, Kubberød, Elin, Lea, Per, Ueland, Øydis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-4f62f9c58ae8207795562459737132d8261adb6a9fa33375ada6a820565b0b383
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-4f62f9c58ae8207795562459737132d8261adb6a9fa33375ada6a820565b0b383
container_end_page 144
container_issue 1
container_start_page 137
container_title Meat science
container_volume 68
creator Rødbotten, Marit
Kubberød, Elin
Lea, Per
Ueland, Øydis
description The aim of the study was to investigate if meat from different species could be described and related to each other by sensory analysis. Muscle meat from 15 different species commercially available in Norway was assessed by a 22 sensory attribute profile and analysed by multivariate analysis. The different species were significantly different on attributes that gave adequate descriptions of all species. Sixty-eight percent of the sensory variation was contained in the first component, which was dominated by colour attributes. In a model where colour was removed, odour and flavour were the most important attributes accounting for 66% and texture attributes, which accounted for only 13%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.02.016
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902814218</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309174004000579</els_id><sourcerecordid>902814218</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-4f62f9c58ae8207795562459737132d8261adb6a9fa33375ada6a820565b0b383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0Mtu1DAUBmALgei09BGAbKqukh5fY69QVXETlbooXVse5xg8ymWwM5X69jidAEtWlo6-8_voJ-QthYYCVVe7ZkA3Zx8bBiAaYE2ZviAbqlteC8r1S7IBDqamrYATcprzDgAoZ_o1OWEMFAPabsi36yrjmKf0VA1uX02hmn9itURXhzE-YsrYVPer2KcpxB4X9SxCmoaKyirv0UfMb8ir4PqM5-t7Rh4-ffx-86W-vfv89eb6tvZCs7kWQbFgvNQONYO2NVIqJqRpeVvO6zRT1HVb5UxwnPNWus4pV6RUcgtbrvkZuTzmlnt-HTDPdojZY9-7EadDtgaYpoLRRcqj9GnKOWGw-xQHl54sBbvUaHd2rdEuNVpgtkzL3rv1h8N2wO7v1p_eCrhYgcve9SG50cf8L11qYAIW9_7ogpus-5GKebgvCRzAcGWMKOLDUWBp7DFisuUYHD12MaGfbTfF_xz7G6DLmag</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>902814218</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A sensory map of the meat universe. Sensory profile of meat from 15 species</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Rødbotten, Marit ; Kubberød, Elin ; Lea, Per ; Ueland, Øydis</creator><creatorcontrib>Rødbotten, Marit ; Kubberød, Elin ; Lea, Per ; Ueland, Øydis</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the study was to investigate if meat from different species could be described and related to each other by sensory analysis. Muscle meat from 15 different species commercially available in Norway was assessed by a 22 sensory attribute profile and analysed by multivariate analysis. The different species were significantly different on attributes that gave adequate descriptions of all species. Sixty-eight percent of the sensory variation was contained in the first component, which was dominated by colour attributes. In a model where colour was removed, odour and flavour were the most important attributes accounting for 66% and texture attributes, which accounted for only 13%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1740</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4138</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.02.016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22062017</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MESCDN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>alternative livestock ; animal age ; Biological and medical sciences ; breed differences ; color ; Comparison ; Food industries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; game meat ; hot water treatment ; juiciness ; lipid content ; longissimus dorsi ; Meat ; Meat and meat product industries ; meat cuts ; off flavors ; off odors ; poultry meat ; red meat ; sensory evaluation ; Sensory profiling ; sensory properties ; Species ; species differences ; temperature ; texture ; whales</subject><ispartof>Meat science, 2004-09, Vol.68 (1), p.137-144</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-4f62f9c58ae8207795562459737132d8261adb6a9fa33375ada6a820565b0b383</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-4f62f9c58ae8207795562459737132d8261adb6a9fa33375ada6a820565b0b383</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15802407$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22062017$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rødbotten, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubberød, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lea, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueland, Øydis</creatorcontrib><title>A sensory map of the meat universe. Sensory profile of meat from 15 species</title><title>Meat science</title><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><description>The aim of the study was to investigate if meat from different species could be described and related to each other by sensory analysis. Muscle meat from 15 different species commercially available in Norway was assessed by a 22 sensory attribute profile and analysed by multivariate analysis. The different species were significantly different on attributes that gave adequate descriptions of all species. Sixty-eight percent of the sensory variation was contained in the first component, which was dominated by colour attributes. In a model where colour was removed, odour and flavour were the most important attributes accounting for 66% and texture attributes, which accounted for only 13%.</description><subject>alternative livestock</subject><subject>animal age</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>breed differences</subject><subject>color</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>Food industries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>game meat</subject><subject>hot water treatment</subject><subject>juiciness</subject><subject>lipid content</subject><subject>longissimus dorsi</subject><subject>Meat</subject><subject>Meat and meat product industries</subject><subject>meat cuts</subject><subject>off flavors</subject><subject>off odors</subject><subject>poultry meat</subject><subject>red meat</subject><subject>sensory evaluation</subject><subject>Sensory profiling</subject><subject>sensory properties</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species differences</subject><subject>temperature</subject><subject>texture</subject><subject>whales</subject><issn>0309-1740</issn><issn>1873-4138</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0Mtu1DAUBmALgei09BGAbKqukh5fY69QVXETlbooXVse5xg8ymWwM5X69jidAEtWlo6-8_voJ-QthYYCVVe7ZkA3Zx8bBiAaYE2ZviAbqlteC8r1S7IBDqamrYATcprzDgAoZ_o1OWEMFAPabsi36yrjmKf0VA1uX02hmn9itURXhzE-YsrYVPer2KcpxB4X9SxCmoaKyirv0UfMb8ir4PqM5-t7Rh4-ffx-86W-vfv89eb6tvZCs7kWQbFgvNQONYO2NVIqJqRpeVvO6zRT1HVb5UxwnPNWus4pV6RUcgtbrvkZuTzmlnt-HTDPdojZY9-7EadDtgaYpoLRRcqj9GnKOWGw-xQHl54sBbvUaHd2rdEuNVpgtkzL3rv1h8N2wO7v1p_eCrhYgcve9SG50cf8L11qYAIW9_7ogpus-5GKebgvCRzAcGWMKOLDUWBp7DFisuUYHD12MaGfbTfF_xz7G6DLmag</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Rødbotten, Marit</creator><creator>Kubberød, Elin</creator><creator>Lea, Per</creator><creator>Ueland, Øydis</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>A sensory map of the meat universe. Sensory profile of meat from 15 species</title><author>Rødbotten, Marit ; Kubberød, Elin ; Lea, Per ; Ueland, Øydis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-4f62f9c58ae8207795562459737132d8261adb6a9fa33375ada6a820565b0b383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>alternative livestock</topic><topic>animal age</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>breed differences</topic><topic>color</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>Food industries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>game meat</topic><topic>hot water treatment</topic><topic>juiciness</topic><topic>lipid content</topic><topic>longissimus dorsi</topic><topic>Meat</topic><topic>Meat and meat product industries</topic><topic>meat cuts</topic><topic>off flavors</topic><topic>off odors</topic><topic>poultry meat</topic><topic>red meat</topic><topic>sensory evaluation</topic><topic>Sensory profiling</topic><topic>sensory properties</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species differences</topic><topic>temperature</topic><topic>texture</topic><topic>whales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rødbotten, Marit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kubberød, Elin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lea, Per</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueland, Øydis</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rødbotten, Marit</au><au>Kubberød, Elin</au><au>Lea, Per</au><au>Ueland, Øydis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A sensory map of the meat universe. Sensory profile of meat from 15 species</atitle><jtitle>Meat science</jtitle><addtitle>Meat Sci</addtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>144</epage><pages>137-144</pages><issn>0309-1740</issn><eissn>1873-4138</eissn><coden>MESCDN</coden><abstract>The aim of the study was to investigate if meat from different species could be described and related to each other by sensory analysis. Muscle meat from 15 different species commercially available in Norway was assessed by a 22 sensory attribute profile and analysed by multivariate analysis. The different species were significantly different on attributes that gave adequate descriptions of all species. Sixty-eight percent of the sensory variation was contained in the first component, which was dominated by colour attributes. In a model where colour was removed, odour and flavour were the most important attributes accounting for 66% and texture attributes, which accounted for only 13%.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>22062017</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.02.016</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0309-1740
ispartof Meat science, 2004-09, Vol.68 (1), p.137-144
issn 0309-1740
1873-4138
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_902814218
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects alternative livestock
animal age
Biological and medical sciences
breed differences
color
Comparison
Food industries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
game meat
hot water treatment
juiciness
lipid content
longissimus dorsi
Meat
Meat and meat product industries
meat cuts
off flavors
off odors
poultry meat
red meat
sensory evaluation
Sensory profiling
sensory properties
Species
species differences
temperature
texture
whales
title A sensory map of the meat universe. Sensory profile of meat from 15 species
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A10%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20sensory%20map%20of%20the%20meat%20universe.%20Sensory%20profile%20of%20meat%20from%2015%20species&rft.jtitle=Meat%20science&rft.au=R%C3%B8dbotten,%20Marit&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=144&rft.pages=137-144&rft.issn=0309-1740&rft.eissn=1873-4138&rft.coden=MESCDN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.02.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E902814218%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-4f62f9c58ae8207795562459737132d8261adb6a9fa33375ada6a820565b0b383%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=902814218&rft_id=info:pmid/22062017&rfr_iscdi=true