Loading…

Fault diagnosis of pneumatic systems with artificial neural network algorithms

Pneumatic systems repeat the identical programmed sequence during their operation. The data was collected when the pneumatic system worked perfectly and had some faults including empty magazine, zero vacuum, inappropriate material, no pressure, closed manual pressure valve, missing drilling stroke,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Expert systems with applications 2009-09, Vol.36 (7), p.10512-10519
Main Authors: Demetgul, M., Tansel, I.N., Taskin, S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-545b83676d7dfce6feeb44d6e0cec44c1cce7ca3c6544a28e5e711ea16845b9f3
cites
container_end_page 10519
container_issue 7
container_start_page 10512
container_title Expert systems with applications
container_volume 36
creator Demetgul, M.
Tansel, I.N.
Taskin, S.
description Pneumatic systems repeat the identical programmed sequence during their operation. The data was collected when the pneumatic system worked perfectly and had some faults including empty magazine, zero vacuum, inappropriate material, no pressure, closed manual pressure valve, missing drilling stroke, poorly located material, not vacuuming the material and low air pressure. The signals of eight sensors were collected during the entire sequence and the 24 most descriptive features of the data were encoded to present to the ANNs. A synthetic data generation process was proposed to train and test the ANNs better when signals are extremely repetitive from one sequence to other. Two artificial neural networks (ANN) were used for interpretation of the encoded signals. The tested ANNs were Adaptive Resonance Theory 2 (ART2), and Back propagation (Bp). ART2 correctly distinguished the perfect and faulty operations at all the tested vigilance values. It classified 11 faulty and 1 normal modes in seven or eight categories at the best vigilance values. Bp also distinguished perfect and faulty operations without even the slightest uncertainty. In less than 10 cases, it had difficulty identifying the 11 types of possible faults. The average estimation error of the Bp was better than 2.1% of the output range on the test data which was created by deviating the encoded values. The ART2 and Bp performance was found excellent with the proposed encoding and synthetic data generation procedures for extremely repetitive sequential data.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903623602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957417409000657</els_id><sourcerecordid>903623602</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-545b83676d7dfce6feeb44d6e0cec44c1cce7ca3c6544a28e5e711ea16845b9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwA0yeYEqwY8dOJBZUUUCqYIHZcp2X4pLExXao-ve4lLnTXc550jsIXVOSU0LF3TqHsNV5QUidE5qTojpBE1pJlglZs1M0IXUpM04lP0cXIawJoZIQOUGvcz12ETdWrwYXbMCuxZsBxl5Ha3DYhQh9wFsbP7H20bbWWN3hBPi_iVvnv7DuVs4npA-X6KzVXYCr_52ij_nj--w5W7w9vcweFplhgsWs5OWyYkKKRjatAdECLDlvBBADhnNDjQFpNDOi5FwXFZQgKQVNRZXMumVTdHu4u_Hue4QQVW-Dga7TA7gxqJowUTBBikTeHCUZ50UlOU9gcQCNdyF4aNXG2177naJE7SOrtdpHVvvIilCVIifp_iBBevbHglfBWBgMNNaDiapx9pj-C6Lgh5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>34428744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fault diagnosis of pneumatic systems with artificial neural network algorithms</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Demetgul, M. ; Tansel, I.N. ; Taskin, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Demetgul, M. ; Tansel, I.N. ; Taskin, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Pneumatic systems repeat the identical programmed sequence during their operation. The data was collected when the pneumatic system worked perfectly and had some faults including empty magazine, zero vacuum, inappropriate material, no pressure, closed manual pressure valve, missing drilling stroke, poorly located material, not vacuuming the material and low air pressure. The signals of eight sensors were collected during the entire sequence and the 24 most descriptive features of the data were encoded to present to the ANNs. A synthetic data generation process was proposed to train and test the ANNs better when signals are extremely repetitive from one sequence to other. Two artificial neural networks (ANN) were used for interpretation of the encoded signals. The tested ANNs were Adaptive Resonance Theory 2 (ART2), and Back propagation (Bp). ART2 correctly distinguished the perfect and faulty operations at all the tested vigilance values. It classified 11 faulty and 1 normal modes in seven or eight categories at the best vigilance values. Bp also distinguished perfect and faulty operations without even the slightest uncertainty. In less than 10 cases, it had difficulty identifying the 11 types of possible faults. The average estimation error of the Bp was better than 2.1% of the output range on the test data which was created by deviating the encoded values. The ART2 and Bp performance was found excellent with the proposed encoding and synthetic data generation procedures for extremely repetitive sequential data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adaptive resonance theory2 (ART2) ; Back propagation (Bp) ; Fault diagnosis ; Modular production system ; Pneumatic</subject><ispartof>Expert systems with applications, 2009-09, Vol.36 (7), p.10512-10519</ispartof><rights>2009 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-545b83676d7dfce6feeb44d6e0cec44c1cce7ca3c6544a28e5e711ea16845b9f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Demetgul, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansel, I.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taskin, S.</creatorcontrib><title>Fault diagnosis of pneumatic systems with artificial neural network algorithms</title><title>Expert systems with applications</title><description>Pneumatic systems repeat the identical programmed sequence during their operation. The data was collected when the pneumatic system worked perfectly and had some faults including empty magazine, zero vacuum, inappropriate material, no pressure, closed manual pressure valve, missing drilling stroke, poorly located material, not vacuuming the material and low air pressure. The signals of eight sensors were collected during the entire sequence and the 24 most descriptive features of the data were encoded to present to the ANNs. A synthetic data generation process was proposed to train and test the ANNs better when signals are extremely repetitive from one sequence to other. Two artificial neural networks (ANN) were used for interpretation of the encoded signals. The tested ANNs were Adaptive Resonance Theory 2 (ART2), and Back propagation (Bp). ART2 correctly distinguished the perfect and faulty operations at all the tested vigilance values. It classified 11 faulty and 1 normal modes in seven or eight categories at the best vigilance values. Bp also distinguished perfect and faulty operations without even the slightest uncertainty. In less than 10 cases, it had difficulty identifying the 11 types of possible faults. The average estimation error of the Bp was better than 2.1% of the output range on the test data which was created by deviating the encoded values. The ART2 and Bp performance was found excellent with the proposed encoding and synthetic data generation procedures for extremely repetitive sequential data.</description><subject>Adaptive resonance theory2 (ART2)</subject><subject>Back propagation (Bp)</subject><subject>Fault diagnosis</subject><subject>Modular production system</subject><subject>Pneumatic</subject><issn>0957-4174</issn><issn>1873-6793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLFOwzAURS0EEqXwA0yeYEqwY8dOJBZUUUCqYIHZcp2X4pLExXao-ve4lLnTXc550jsIXVOSU0LF3TqHsNV5QUidE5qTojpBE1pJlglZs1M0IXUpM04lP0cXIawJoZIQOUGvcz12ETdWrwYXbMCuxZsBxl5Ha3DYhQh9wFsbP7H20bbWWN3hBPi_iVvnv7DuVs4npA-X6KzVXYCr_52ij_nj--w5W7w9vcweFplhgsWs5OWyYkKKRjatAdECLDlvBBADhnNDjQFpNDOi5FwXFZQgKQVNRZXMumVTdHu4u_Hue4QQVW-Dga7TA7gxqJowUTBBikTeHCUZ50UlOU9gcQCNdyF4aNXG2177naJE7SOrtdpHVvvIilCVIifp_iBBevbHglfBWBgMNNaDiapx9pj-C6Lgh5g</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Demetgul, M.</creator><creator>Tansel, I.N.</creator><creator>Taskin, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>Fault diagnosis of pneumatic systems with artificial neural network algorithms</title><author>Demetgul, M. ; Tansel, I.N. ; Taskin, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-545b83676d7dfce6feeb44d6e0cec44c1cce7ca3c6544a28e5e711ea16845b9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adaptive resonance theory2 (ART2)</topic><topic>Back propagation (Bp)</topic><topic>Fault diagnosis</topic><topic>Modular production system</topic><topic>Pneumatic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Demetgul, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansel, I.N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taskin, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Expert systems with applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Demetgul, M.</au><au>Tansel, I.N.</au><au>Taskin, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fault diagnosis of pneumatic systems with artificial neural network algorithms</atitle><jtitle>Expert systems with applications</jtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>10512</spage><epage>10519</epage><pages>10512-10519</pages><issn>0957-4174</issn><eissn>1873-6793</eissn><abstract>Pneumatic systems repeat the identical programmed sequence during their operation. The data was collected when the pneumatic system worked perfectly and had some faults including empty magazine, zero vacuum, inappropriate material, no pressure, closed manual pressure valve, missing drilling stroke, poorly located material, not vacuuming the material and low air pressure. The signals of eight sensors were collected during the entire sequence and the 24 most descriptive features of the data were encoded to present to the ANNs. A synthetic data generation process was proposed to train and test the ANNs better when signals are extremely repetitive from one sequence to other. Two artificial neural networks (ANN) were used for interpretation of the encoded signals. The tested ANNs were Adaptive Resonance Theory 2 (ART2), and Back propagation (Bp). ART2 correctly distinguished the perfect and faulty operations at all the tested vigilance values. It classified 11 faulty and 1 normal modes in seven or eight categories at the best vigilance values. Bp also distinguished perfect and faulty operations without even the slightest uncertainty. In less than 10 cases, it had difficulty identifying the 11 types of possible faults. The average estimation error of the Bp was better than 2.1% of the output range on the test data which was created by deviating the encoded values. The ART2 and Bp performance was found excellent with the proposed encoding and synthetic data generation procedures for extremely repetitive sequential data.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.028</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-4174
ispartof Expert systems with applications, 2009-09, Vol.36 (7), p.10512-10519
issn 0957-4174
1873-6793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903623602
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adaptive resonance theory2 (ART2)
Back propagation (Bp)
Fault diagnosis
Modular production system
Pneumatic
title Fault diagnosis of pneumatic systems with artificial neural network algorithms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T13%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fault%20diagnosis%20of%20pneumatic%20systems%20with%20artificial%20neural%20network%20algorithms&rft.jtitle=Expert%20systems%20with%20applications&rft.au=Demetgul,%20M.&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=10512&rft.epage=10519&rft.pages=10512-10519&rft.issn=0957-4174&rft.eissn=1873-6793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E903623602%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-545b83676d7dfce6feeb44d6e0cec44c1cce7ca3c6544a28e5e711ea16845b9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=34428744&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true