Loading…
Methods for isolation of cell-free plasma DNA strongly affect DNA yield
Extracellular nucleic acids are present in plasma, serum, and other body fluids and their analysis has gained increasing attention during recent years. Because of the small quantity and highly fragmented nature of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum, a fast, efficient, and reliable isolation method is...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinica chimica acta 2011-11, Vol.412 (23-24), p.2085-2088 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-713fdb0e601c2eb22fc5757babaf619dc84ffed61314b336b7f78f39f357ec1f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-713fdb0e601c2eb22fc5757babaf619dc84ffed61314b336b7f78f39f357ec1f3 |
container_end_page | 2088 |
container_issue | 23-24 |
container_start_page | 2085 |
container_title | Clinica chimica acta |
container_volume | 412 |
creator | Fleischhacker, Michael Schmidt, Bernd Weickmann, Sabine Fersching, Debora M.I. Leszinski, Gloria S. Siegele, Barbara Stötzer, Oliver J. Nagel, Dorothea Holdenrieder, Stefan |
description | Extracellular nucleic acids are present in plasma, serum, and other body fluids and their analysis has gained increasing attention during recent years. Because of the small quantity and highly fragmented nature of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum, a fast, efficient, and reliable isolation method is still a problem and so far there is no agreement on a standardized method. We used spin columns from commercial suppliers (QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit from Qiagen; NucleoSpin Kit from Macherey-Nagel; MagNA Pure isolation system from Roche Diagnostics) to isolate DNA from 44 plasma samples in parallel at laboratories in Berlin and Munich. DNA in all samples was quantified by real-time PCR on a LightCycler 480 using three different targets (GAPDH, ß-globin, ERV). The quantities of cell-free DNA for the different isolation methods and genes varied between medians of 1.6ng/mL and 28.1ng/mL. This considerable variation of absolute DNA values was mainly caused by the use of different isolation methods (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.011 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903663378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0009898111004098</els_id><sourcerecordid>903663378</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-713fdb0e601c2eb22fc5757babaf619dc84ffed61314b336b7f78f39f357ec1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFxQbpwSvHFiJ-JU8VOQClzgbDnOGlylcbFTpL49Li0cOY12NTPa_Qg5B5oBBX61yLRWWU4BMiqyKAdkDJVgKSvq_JCMKaV1WtUVjMhJCIs4FpTDMRnlUHGo62JMZk84fLg2JMb5xAbXqcG6PnEm0dh1qfGIyapTYamS2-dpEgbv-vdukyhjUA8_u43Frj0lR0Z1Ac_2OiFv93evNw_p_GX2eDOdp5qV-ZAKYKZtKHIKOscmz40uRSka1SgTL2p1VcTilgODomGMN8KIyrDasFKgBsMm5HLXu_Luc41hkEsbtqeqHt06yJoyzhkTVXTCzqm9C8GjkStvl8pvJFC5xScXMuKTW3ySChklZi727etmie1f4pdXNFzvDBh__LLoZdAWe42t9ZGHbJ39p_4bD7Z_Qw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>903663378</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Methods for isolation of cell-free plasma DNA strongly affect DNA yield</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Fleischhacker, Michael ; Schmidt, Bernd ; Weickmann, Sabine ; Fersching, Debora M.I. ; Leszinski, Gloria S. ; Siegele, Barbara ; Stötzer, Oliver J. ; Nagel, Dorothea ; Holdenrieder, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Fleischhacker, Michael ; Schmidt, Bernd ; Weickmann, Sabine ; Fersching, Debora M.I. ; Leszinski, Gloria S. ; Siegele, Barbara ; Stötzer, Oliver J. ; Nagel, Dorothea ; Holdenrieder, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Extracellular nucleic acids are present in plasma, serum, and other body fluids and their analysis has gained increasing attention during recent years. Because of the small quantity and highly fragmented nature of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum, a fast, efficient, and reliable isolation method is still a problem and so far there is no agreement on a standardized method. We used spin columns from commercial suppliers (QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit from Qiagen; NucleoSpin Kit from Macherey-Nagel; MagNA Pure isolation system from Roche Diagnostics) to isolate DNA from 44 plasma samples in parallel at laboratories in Berlin and Munich. DNA in all samples was quantified by real-time PCR on a LightCycler 480 using three different targets (GAPDH, ß-globin, ERV). The quantities of cell-free DNA for the different isolation methods and genes varied between medians of 1.6ng/mL and 28.1ng/mL. This considerable variation of absolute DNA values was mainly caused by the use of different isolation methods (p<0.0001). Comparable results were achieved by the use of the genes GAPDH and ERV while higher values were obtained by use of ß-globin. The laboratory site had only minor influence on DNA yield when manual extraction methods were used.
► Free-circulating nucleic acids become increasingly important. ► There is so far no standardized method for DNA isolation from plasma. ► We applied 3 different methods for DNA isolation from plasma in 2 different laboratories. ► Different yields are due to the methods used and not the isolation site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0009-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-3492</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 21861994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Base Sequence ; Cell-Free System ; DNA - blood ; DNA Primers ; Humans ; Isolation method ; Plasma DNA ; Quantification ; Real-time PCR ; Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><ispartof>Clinica chimica acta, 2011-11, Vol.412 (23-24), p.2085-2088</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-713fdb0e601c2eb22fc5757babaf619dc84ffed61314b336b7f78f39f357ec1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-713fdb0e601c2eb22fc5757babaf619dc84ffed61314b336b7f78f39f357ec1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21861994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fleischhacker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weickmann, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fersching, Debora M.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leszinski, Gloria S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegele, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stötzer, Oliver J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdenrieder, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Methods for isolation of cell-free plasma DNA strongly affect DNA yield</title><title>Clinica chimica acta</title><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><description>Extracellular nucleic acids are present in plasma, serum, and other body fluids and their analysis has gained increasing attention during recent years. Because of the small quantity and highly fragmented nature of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum, a fast, efficient, and reliable isolation method is still a problem and so far there is no agreement on a standardized method. We used spin columns from commercial suppliers (QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit from Qiagen; NucleoSpin Kit from Macherey-Nagel; MagNA Pure isolation system from Roche Diagnostics) to isolate DNA from 44 plasma samples in parallel at laboratories in Berlin and Munich. DNA in all samples was quantified by real-time PCR on a LightCycler 480 using three different targets (GAPDH, ß-globin, ERV). The quantities of cell-free DNA for the different isolation methods and genes varied between medians of 1.6ng/mL and 28.1ng/mL. This considerable variation of absolute DNA values was mainly caused by the use of different isolation methods (p<0.0001). Comparable results were achieved by the use of the genes GAPDH and ERV while higher values were obtained by use of ß-globin. The laboratory site had only minor influence on DNA yield when manual extraction methods were used.
► Free-circulating nucleic acids become increasingly important. ► There is so far no standardized method for DNA isolation from plasma. ► We applied 3 different methods for DNA isolation from plasma in 2 different laboratories. ► Different yields are due to the methods used and not the isolation site.</description><subject>Base Sequence</subject><subject>Cell-Free System</subject><subject>DNA - blood</subject><subject>DNA Primers</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Isolation method</subject><subject>Plasma DNA</subject><subject>Quantification</subject><subject>Real-time PCR</subject><subject>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><issn>0009-8981</issn><issn>1873-3492</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFxQbpwSvHFiJ-JU8VOQClzgbDnOGlylcbFTpL49Li0cOY12NTPa_Qg5B5oBBX61yLRWWU4BMiqyKAdkDJVgKSvq_JCMKaV1WtUVjMhJCIs4FpTDMRnlUHGo62JMZk84fLg2JMb5xAbXqcG6PnEm0dh1qfGIyapTYamS2-dpEgbv-vdukyhjUA8_u43Frj0lR0Z1Ac_2OiFv93evNw_p_GX2eDOdp5qV-ZAKYKZtKHIKOscmz40uRSka1SgTL2p1VcTilgODomGMN8KIyrDasFKgBsMm5HLXu_Luc41hkEsbtqeqHt06yJoyzhkTVXTCzqm9C8GjkStvl8pvJFC5xScXMuKTW3ySChklZi727etmie1f4pdXNFzvDBh__LLoZdAWe42t9ZGHbJ39p_4bD7Z_Qw</recordid><startdate>20111120</startdate><enddate>20111120</enddate><creator>Fleischhacker, Michael</creator><creator>Schmidt, Bernd</creator><creator>Weickmann, Sabine</creator><creator>Fersching, Debora M.I.</creator><creator>Leszinski, Gloria S.</creator><creator>Siegele, Barbara</creator><creator>Stötzer, Oliver J.</creator><creator>Nagel, Dorothea</creator><creator>Holdenrieder, Stefan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111120</creationdate><title>Methods for isolation of cell-free plasma DNA strongly affect DNA yield</title><author>Fleischhacker, Michael ; Schmidt, Bernd ; Weickmann, Sabine ; Fersching, Debora M.I. ; Leszinski, Gloria S. ; Siegele, Barbara ; Stötzer, Oliver J. ; Nagel, Dorothea ; Holdenrieder, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-713fdb0e601c2eb22fc5757babaf619dc84ffed61314b336b7f78f39f357ec1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Base Sequence</topic><topic>Cell-Free System</topic><topic>DNA - blood</topic><topic>DNA Primers</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Isolation method</topic><topic>Plasma DNA</topic><topic>Quantification</topic><topic>Real-time PCR</topic><topic>Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fleischhacker, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weickmann, Sabine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fersching, Debora M.I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leszinski, Gloria S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegele, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stötzer, Oliver J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagel, Dorothea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holdenrieder, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fleischhacker, Michael</au><au>Schmidt, Bernd</au><au>Weickmann, Sabine</au><au>Fersching, Debora M.I.</au><au>Leszinski, Gloria S.</au><au>Siegele, Barbara</au><au>Stötzer, Oliver J.</au><au>Nagel, Dorothea</au><au>Holdenrieder, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Methods for isolation of cell-free plasma DNA strongly affect DNA yield</atitle><jtitle>Clinica chimica acta</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Chim Acta</addtitle><date>2011-11-20</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>412</volume><issue>23-24</issue><spage>2085</spage><epage>2088</epage><pages>2085-2088</pages><issn>0009-8981</issn><eissn>1873-3492</eissn><abstract>Extracellular nucleic acids are present in plasma, serum, and other body fluids and their analysis has gained increasing attention during recent years. Because of the small quantity and highly fragmented nature of cell-free DNA in plasma and serum, a fast, efficient, and reliable isolation method is still a problem and so far there is no agreement on a standardized method. We used spin columns from commercial suppliers (QIAamp DNA Blood Midi Kit from Qiagen; NucleoSpin Kit from Macherey-Nagel; MagNA Pure isolation system from Roche Diagnostics) to isolate DNA from 44 plasma samples in parallel at laboratories in Berlin and Munich. DNA in all samples was quantified by real-time PCR on a LightCycler 480 using three different targets (GAPDH, ß-globin, ERV). The quantities of cell-free DNA for the different isolation methods and genes varied between medians of 1.6ng/mL and 28.1ng/mL. This considerable variation of absolute DNA values was mainly caused by the use of different isolation methods (p<0.0001). Comparable results were achieved by the use of the genes GAPDH and ERV while higher values were obtained by use of ß-globin. The laboratory site had only minor influence on DNA yield when manual extraction methods were used.
► Free-circulating nucleic acids become increasingly important. ► There is so far no standardized method for DNA isolation from plasma. ► We applied 3 different methods for DNA isolation from plasma in 2 different laboratories. ► Different yields are due to the methods used and not the isolation site.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>21861994</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.011</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0009-8981 |
ispartof | Clinica chimica acta, 2011-11, Vol.412 (23-24), p.2085-2088 |
issn | 0009-8981 1873-3492 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_903663378 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Base Sequence Cell-Free System DNA - blood DNA Primers Humans Isolation method Plasma DNA Quantification Real-time PCR Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction |
title | Methods for isolation of cell-free plasma DNA strongly affect DNA yield |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T17%3A14%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Methods%20for%20isolation%20of%20cell-free%20plasma%20DNA%20strongly%20affect%20DNA%20yield&rft.jtitle=Clinica%20chimica%20acta&rft.au=Fleischhacker,%20Michael&rft.date=2011-11-20&rft.volume=412&rft.issue=23-24&rft.spage=2085&rft.epage=2088&rft.pages=2085-2088&rft.issn=0009-8981&rft.eissn=1873-3492&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cca.2011.07.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E903663378%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-713fdb0e601c2eb22fc5757babaf619dc84ffed61314b336b7f78f39f357ec1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=903663378&rft_id=info:pmid/21861994&rfr_iscdi=true |