Trace classical conditioning in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): what do they learn

There are two main memory systems: declarative and procedural memory. Knowledge of these two systems in fish is scarce, and controlled laboratory studies are needed. Trace classical conditioning is an experimentally tractable model of declarative memory. We tested whether rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Animal cognition 2010-03, Vol.13 (2), p.303-309
Main Authors: Nordgreen, Janicke, Janczak, Andrew Michael, Hovland, Anne Lene, Ranheim, Birgit, Horsberg, Tor Einar
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal behavior
Animal cognition
Animals
Appetitive Behavior
Association Learning
Behavioral Sciences
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Conditioning, Classical
Feeding Behavior - psychology
Fish
Food
Life Sciences
Memory
Oncorhynchus mykiss
Original Paper
Photic Stimulation
Psychology Research
Reaction Time
Reward
Salmon
Training
Zoology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:There are two main memory systems: declarative and procedural memory. Knowledge of these two systems in fish is scarce, and controlled laboratory studies are needed. Trace classical conditioning is an experimentally tractable model of declarative memory. We tested whether rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) can learn by trace conditioning and form stimulus-stimulus, as opposed to stimulus-response, associations. We predicted that rainbow trout trained by trace conditioning would show appetitive behaviour (conditioned response; CR) towards the conditioned stimulus (CS; light), and that the CR would be sensitive to devaluation of the unconditioned stimulus (US; food). The learning group (L, N = 14) was trained on a CS + US contingency schedule with a trace interval of 3.4 s. The control group (CtrL, N = 4) was kept on a completely random schedule. The fish that learnt were further trained as either an experimental (L, N = 6) or a memory control (CtrM, N = 3) group. The L group had the US devalued. The CtrM group received only food. No fish in the CtrL group, but nine fish from the L group conditioned to the light. When tested, five L fish changed their CRs after US devaluation, indicating learning by stimulus-stimulus association of the light with the food. CtrM fish retained their original CRs. To the best of our knowledge, this experiment is the first to show that rainbow trout can learn by trace classical conditioning. The results indicate that the fish learnt by ‘facts-learning' rather than by reflex acquisition in this study.
ISSN:1435-9448
1435-9456
DOI:10.1007/s10071-009-0267-3