Loading…

Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?

Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Age and ageing 2010-09, Vol.39 (5), p.588-591
Main Authors: Allen, S.C., Charlton, C., Backen, W., Warwick-Sanders, M., Yeung, P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43
container_end_page 591
container_issue 5
container_start_page 588
container_title Age and ageing
container_volume 39
creator Allen, S.C.
Charlton, C.
Backen, W.
Warwick-Sanders, M.
Yeung, P.
description Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ageing/afq084
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904470332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A238826443</galeid><sourcerecordid>A238826443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoreFJVtksWEV6r_E9gpVV9wWqVJZFAmxsRxncnFx4tR2WrrjIfqEPAmGW1qJTVcey5_OnBmfqnpF8DuCFTs0W3DT9tAMl1jyJ9WK8FbWVDL-tFphjGmNBVV71X5KF-VKGkKfV3sUt7Qhkq-q4RPEIcSxaKDkwzW6ctl4ZM1srMs3yE0o-B4imiHMHtC1y9-Qmfq_RVgysmE7ueyuALlxNi6OMGX06-ctcgm5jJYEw-Lfv6ieDcYneHl3HlSfNx_O1yf16dnxx_XRaW25krnuekKw7K1pKJFNL7iyVirBGs6hWKbKGG77rlVcKjLYXtnOtkOHDdAOaM_ZQfV2pzvHcLlAynp0yYL3ZoKwJK0w5wIzRh8lhaC0YZQ3j5PFTFknl4V88x95EZY4lYG1aARuCVGkQPUO2hoP2k02TBl-ZBu8hy3oso71mT6iTEracs4eeBtDShEGPUc3mnijCdZ_IqB3EdC7CBT-9Z2JpRuhv6f__fmDoEul8f27id91K5ho9MmXr_qc4jXZHG80Zr8BVs69XQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757061191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Allen, S.C. ; Charlton, C. ; Backen, W. ; Warwick-Sanders, M. ; Yeung, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, S.C. ; Charlton, C. ; Backen, W. ; Warwick-Sanders, M. ; Yeung, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE &lt; 24 with poor co-ordination). An inability to do neither FVC nor SVC was predicted by an MMSE &lt; 24/30 (P &lt; 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: SVC is not a usable substitute for FVC for elderly patients with cognitive impairment but is of some utility for those who tend to cough. An MMSE &lt; 24/30 is predictive of inability to perform FVC and SVC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20625184</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - physiology ; Care and treatment ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognition disorders ; Cognition Disorders - physiopathology ; Cognitive disorders ; Cognitive impairment ; Concordance ; Cough - etiology ; Cough reflex ; Development and progression ; Elderly ; Female ; forced vital capacity ; Humans ; Inpatient care ; Lung Diseases - diagnosis ; Lung Diseases - physiopathology ; Male ; Medical tests ; Methods ; Minimental State Examination ; Neurological disorders ; Older people ; Patient Compliance ; Patients ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Psychological aspects ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; slow vital capacity ; Spirometry ; Spirometry - adverse effects ; Spirometry - methods ; Vital Capacity - physiology ; Whooping cough</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2010-09, Vol.39 (5), p.588-591</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20625184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, S.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warwick-Sanders, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE &lt; 24 with poor co-ordination). An inability to do neither FVC nor SVC was predicted by an MMSE &lt; 24/30 (P &lt; 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: SVC is not a usable substitute for FVC for elderly patients with cognitive impairment but is of some utility for those who tend to cough. An MMSE &lt; 24/30 is predictive of inability to perform FVC and SVC.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition disorders</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cognitive disorders</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Concordance</subject><subject>Cough - etiology</subject><subject>Cough reflex</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>forced vital capacity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Minimental State Examination</subject><subject>Neurological disorders</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>slow vital capacity</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><subject>Spirometry - adverse effects</subject><subject>Spirometry - methods</subject><subject>Vital Capacity - physiology</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoreFJVtksWEV6r_E9gpVV9wWqVJZFAmxsRxncnFx4tR2WrrjIfqEPAmGW1qJTVcey5_OnBmfqnpF8DuCFTs0W3DT9tAMl1jyJ9WK8FbWVDL-tFphjGmNBVV71X5KF-VKGkKfV3sUt7Qhkq-q4RPEIcSxaKDkwzW6ctl4ZM1srMs3yE0o-B4imiHMHtC1y9-Qmfq_RVgysmE7ueyuALlxNi6OMGX06-ctcgm5jJYEw-Lfv6ieDcYneHl3HlSfNx_O1yf16dnxx_XRaW25krnuekKw7K1pKJFNL7iyVirBGs6hWKbKGG77rlVcKjLYXtnOtkOHDdAOaM_ZQfV2pzvHcLlAynp0yYL3ZoKwJK0w5wIzRh8lhaC0YZQ3j5PFTFknl4V88x95EZY4lYG1aARuCVGkQPUO2hoP2k02TBl-ZBu8hy3oso71mT6iTEracs4eeBtDShEGPUc3mnijCdZ_IqB3EdC7CBT-9Z2JpRuhv6f__fmDoEul8f27id91K5ho9MmXr_qc4jXZHG80Zr8BVs69XQ</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Allen, S.C.</creator><creator>Charlton, C.</creator><creator>Backen, W.</creator><creator>Warwick-Sanders, M.</creator><creator>Yeung, P.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</title><author>Allen, S.C. ; Charlton, C. ; Backen, W. ; Warwick-Sanders, M. ; Yeung, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition disorders</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cognitive disorders</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Concordance</topic><topic>Cough - etiology</topic><topic>Cough reflex</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>forced vital capacity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Minimental State Examination</topic><topic>Neurological disorders</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>slow vital capacity</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><topic>Spirometry - adverse effects</topic><topic>Spirometry - methods</topic><topic>Vital Capacity - physiology</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, S.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warwick-Sanders, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, S.C.</au><au>Charlton, C.</au><au>Backen, W.</au><au>Warwick-Sanders, M.</au><au>Yeung, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>588</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>588-591</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><coden>AANGAH</coden><abstract>Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE &lt; 24 with poor co-ordination). An inability to do neither FVC nor SVC was predicted by an MMSE &lt; 24/30 (P &lt; 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: SVC is not a usable substitute for FVC for elderly patients with cognitive impairment but is of some utility for those who tend to cough. An MMSE &lt; 24/30 is predictive of inability to perform FVC and SVC.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>20625184</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afq084</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-0729
ispartof Age and ageing, 2010-09, Vol.39 (5), p.588-591
issn 0002-0729
1468-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904470332
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging - physiology
Care and treatment
Cognition - physiology
Cognition disorders
Cognition Disorders - physiopathology
Cognitive disorders
Cognitive impairment
Concordance
Cough - etiology
Cough reflex
Development and progression
Elderly
Female
forced vital capacity
Humans
Inpatient care
Lung Diseases - diagnosis
Lung Diseases - physiopathology
Male
Medical tests
Methods
Minimental State Examination
Neurological disorders
Older people
Patient Compliance
Patients
Predictive Value of Tests
Psychological aspects
Sensitivity and Specificity
slow vital capacity
Spirometry
Spirometry - adverse effects
Spirometry - methods
Vital Capacity - physiology
Whooping cough
title Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performing%20slow%20vital%20capacity%20in%20older%20people%20with%20and%20without%20cognitive%20impairment%20%E2%80%94%20is%20it%20useful?&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Allen,%20S.C.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=588&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=588-591&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft.coden=AANGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afq084&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA238826443%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757061191&rft_id=info:pmid/20625184&rft_galeid=A238826443&rfr_iscdi=true