Loading…
Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?
Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine...
Saved in:
Published in: | Age and ageing 2010-09, Vol.39 (5), p.588-591 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43 |
container_end_page | 591 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 588 |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Allen, S.C. Charlton, C. Backen, W. Warwick-Sanders, M. Yeung, P. |
description | Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afq084 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904470332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A238826443</galeid><sourcerecordid>A238826443</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoreFJVtksWEV6r_E9gpVV9wWqVJZFAmxsRxncnFx4tR2WrrjIfqEPAmGW1qJTVcey5_OnBmfqnpF8DuCFTs0W3DT9tAMl1jyJ9WK8FbWVDL-tFphjGmNBVV71X5KF-VKGkKfV3sUt7Qhkq-q4RPEIcSxaKDkwzW6ctl4ZM1srMs3yE0o-B4imiHMHtC1y9-Qmfq_RVgysmE7ueyuALlxNi6OMGX06-ctcgm5jJYEw-Lfv6ieDcYneHl3HlSfNx_O1yf16dnxx_XRaW25krnuekKw7K1pKJFNL7iyVirBGs6hWKbKGG77rlVcKjLYXtnOtkOHDdAOaM_ZQfV2pzvHcLlAynp0yYL3ZoKwJK0w5wIzRh8lhaC0YZQ3j5PFTFknl4V88x95EZY4lYG1aARuCVGkQPUO2hoP2k02TBl-ZBu8hy3oso71mT6iTEracs4eeBtDShEGPUc3mnijCdZ_IqB3EdC7CBT-9Z2JpRuhv6f__fmDoEul8f27id91K5ho9MmXr_qc4jXZHG80Zr8BVs69XQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>757061191</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Allen, S.C. ; Charlton, C. ; Backen, W. ; Warwick-Sanders, M. ; Yeung, P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Allen, S.C. ; Charlton, C. ; Backen, W. ; Warwick-Sanders, M. ; Yeung, P.</creatorcontrib><description>Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE < 24 with poor co-ordination). An inability to do neither FVC nor SVC was predicted by an MMSE < 24/30 (P < 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: SVC is not a usable substitute for FVC for elderly patients with cognitive impairment but is of some utility for those who tend to cough. An MMSE < 24/30 is predictive of inability to perform FVC and SVC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20625184</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AANGAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging - physiology ; Care and treatment ; Cognition - physiology ; Cognition disorders ; Cognition Disorders - physiopathology ; Cognitive disorders ; Cognitive impairment ; Concordance ; Cough - etiology ; Cough reflex ; Development and progression ; Elderly ; Female ; forced vital capacity ; Humans ; Inpatient care ; Lung Diseases - diagnosis ; Lung Diseases - physiopathology ; Male ; Medical tests ; Methods ; Minimental State Examination ; Neurological disorders ; Older people ; Patient Compliance ; Patients ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Psychological aspects ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; slow vital capacity ; Spirometry ; Spirometry - adverse effects ; Spirometry - methods ; Vital Capacity - physiology ; Whooping cough</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2010-09, Vol.39 (5), p.588-591</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford Publishing Limited(England) Sep 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,30998,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20625184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Allen, S.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warwick-Sanders, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, P.</creatorcontrib><title>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</title><title>Age and ageing</title><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><description>Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE < 24 with poor co-ordination). An inability to do neither FVC nor SVC was predicted by an MMSE < 24/30 (P < 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: SVC is not a usable substitute for FVC for elderly patients with cognitive impairment but is of some utility for those who tend to cough. An MMSE < 24/30 is predictive of inability to perform FVC and SVC.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging - physiology</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Cognition - physiology</subject><subject>Cognition disorders</subject><subject>Cognition Disorders - physiopathology</subject><subject>Cognitive disorders</subject><subject>Cognitive impairment</subject><subject>Concordance</subject><subject>Cough - etiology</subject><subject>Cough reflex</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Elderly</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>forced vital capacity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient care</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Diseases - physiopathology</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical tests</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Minimental State Examination</subject><subject>Neurological disorders</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient Compliance</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>slow vital capacity</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><subject>Spirometry - adverse effects</subject><subject>Spirometry - methods</subject><subject>Vital Capacity - physiology</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1TAQhSMEoreFJVtksWEV6r_E9gpVV9wWqVJZFAmxsRxncnFx4tR2WrrjIfqEPAmGW1qJTVcey5_OnBmfqnpF8DuCFTs0W3DT9tAMl1jyJ9WK8FbWVDL-tFphjGmNBVV71X5KF-VKGkKfV3sUt7Qhkq-q4RPEIcSxaKDkwzW6ctl4ZM1srMs3yE0o-B4imiHMHtC1y9-Qmfq_RVgysmE7ueyuALlxNi6OMGX06-ctcgm5jJYEw-Lfv6ieDcYneHl3HlSfNx_O1yf16dnxx_XRaW25krnuekKw7K1pKJFNL7iyVirBGs6hWKbKGG77rlVcKjLYXtnOtkOHDdAOaM_ZQfV2pzvHcLlAynp0yYL3ZoKwJK0w5wIzRh8lhaC0YZQ3j5PFTFknl4V88x95EZY4lYG1aARuCVGkQPUO2hoP2k02TBl-ZBu8hy3oso71mT6iTEracs4eeBtDShEGPUc3mnijCdZ_IqB3EdC7CBT-9Z2JpRuhv6f__fmDoEul8f27id91K5ho9MmXr_qc4jXZHG80Zr8BVs69XQ</recordid><startdate>20100901</startdate><enddate>20100901</enddate><creator>Allen, S.C.</creator><creator>Charlton, C.</creator><creator>Backen, W.</creator><creator>Warwick-Sanders, M.</creator><creator>Yeung, P.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100901</creationdate><title>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</title><author>Allen, S.C. ; Charlton, C. ; Backen, W. ; Warwick-Sanders, M. ; Yeung, P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging - physiology</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Cognition - physiology</topic><topic>Cognition disorders</topic><topic>Cognition Disorders - physiopathology</topic><topic>Cognitive disorders</topic><topic>Cognitive impairment</topic><topic>Concordance</topic><topic>Cough - etiology</topic><topic>Cough reflex</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Elderly</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>forced vital capacity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient care</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Diseases - physiopathology</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical tests</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Minimental State Examination</topic><topic>Neurological disorders</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient Compliance</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>slow vital capacity</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><topic>Spirometry - adverse effects</topic><topic>Spirometry - methods</topic><topic>Vital Capacity - physiology</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Allen, S.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charlton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Backen, W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warwick-Sanders, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Allen, S.C.</au><au>Charlton, C.</au><au>Backen, W.</au><au>Warwick-Sanders, M.</au><au>Yeung, P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful?</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><addtitle>Age Ageing</addtitle><date>2010-09-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>588</spage><epage>591</epage><pages>588-591</pages><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><coden>AANGAH</coden><abstract>Background: most patients with moderate cognitive impairment are unable to perform forced spirometry. It has been suggested that slow vital capacity (SVC) is easier to perform than forced vital capacity (FVC) because it requires less understanding and co-ordination. We conducted a study to determine whether that assertion is correct. Methods: we studied 83 inpatients, mean age 83 years (range 67–95, 51 female). They had measurements made of FVC, SVC and the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The spirometry was conducted using the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standards. Results: of the 83 subjects, 38 were able to do both FVC and SVC and 32 were unable to do either. The overall concordance was 84%. Twelve were able to do SVC but not FVC (eight due to excessive cough, two due to weakness and two had an MMSE < 24 with poor co-ordination). An inability to do neither FVC nor SVC was predicted by an MMSE < 24/30 (P < 0.0001) with a sensitivity of 88% and specificity of 67%. Conclusion: SVC is not a usable substitute for FVC for elderly patients with cognitive impairment but is of some utility for those who tend to cough. An MMSE < 24/30 is predictive of inability to perform FVC and SVC.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>20625184</pmid><doi>10.1093/ageing/afq084</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2010-09, Vol.39 (5), p.588-591 |
issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_904470332 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging - physiology Care and treatment Cognition - physiology Cognition disorders Cognition Disorders - physiopathology Cognitive disorders Cognitive impairment Concordance Cough - etiology Cough reflex Development and progression Elderly Female forced vital capacity Humans Inpatient care Lung Diseases - diagnosis Lung Diseases - physiopathology Male Medical tests Methods Minimental State Examination Neurological disorders Older people Patient Compliance Patients Predictive Value of Tests Psychological aspects Sensitivity and Specificity slow vital capacity Spirometry Spirometry - adverse effects Spirometry - methods Vital Capacity - physiology Whooping cough |
title | Performing slow vital capacity in older people with and without cognitive impairment — is it useful? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T11%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performing%20slow%20vital%20capacity%20in%20older%20people%20with%20and%20without%20cognitive%20impairment%20%E2%80%94%20is%20it%20useful?&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Allen,%20S.C.&rft.date=2010-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=588&rft.epage=591&rft.pages=588-591&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft.coden=AANGAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afq084&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA238826443%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c498t-bd1108dca52185d749cc8973544e06229aa4cdb694891fcd9cbc6fb0ae2be2d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=757061191&rft_id=info:pmid/20625184&rft_galeid=A238826443&rfr_iscdi=true |